Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

01 May 2012: Public Health  

The prevalence of metabolic risk factors among outpatients with diagnosed nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Lithuania

Jonas Valantinas BDEF , Daiva Asta Apanaviciene ADEG , Ligita Maroziene CDEF , Audrius Sveikata DE

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.882722

Med Sci Monit 2012; 18(5): PH57-62

0 Comments

Background

For many years, alcoholic liver disease and viral hepatitis-induced liver disease were considered the main causes of liver disease morbidity and mortality. However, with the dramatic increase in the prevalence of obesity, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease and is now receiving greater attention globally. NAFLD describes a pathologic condition characterized by significant lipid deposition in the hepatocytes of the liver parenchyma in patients with no history of excessive alcohol consumption [1]. The spectrum of NAFDL includes hepatic steatosis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, chronic fibrosis and cirrhosis [2]. The true incidence and prevalence of the disease is difficult to ascertain accurately due to lack of effective screening tests that can be applied to the entire population. Population-based epidemiological studies using ultrasound imaging as a diagnostic modality have detected the presence of fatty liver in 13% to 22% of the population of lean nonalcoholic subjects [3,4]. Estimates in the United States population suggest that up to 30% of adults may have NAFLD. The prevalence estimates from several other countries are quite variable, but depict a highly prevalent condition, with ~20% of the adult population with ultrasound-defined NAFLD [5]. The prevalence of NAFLD increases to 50–55% in type-2 diabetics and patients with hypertriglyceridemia, and to 75% in obese persons [6].

Increasing evidence indicates that NAFLD is the hepatic component of a systemic metabolic syndrome [7] that includes obesity, insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Approximately 90% of patients with NAFLD have ≥1 characteristic features of metabolic syndrome and about 33% have the complete diagnosis [8]. In individuals with NAFDL, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome increases with increasing body mass index, from 18% in normal-weight subjects to 67% in obese subjects [9]. Furthermore, with the addition of each of the components of the metabolic syndrome, the risk of steatosis increases exponentially [10].

Considerable controversy surrounds the metabolic syndrome. Criticism has been leveled at the syndrome in part because of varying and incomplete definitions and the lack of a unifying mechanism. In addition, the individual components of the metabolic syndrome themselves are adequate to predict the risk of cardiovascular disease or diabetes. Although the clinical usefulness of metabolic syndrome has been questioned, it is still considered useful as an educational concept [11–14].

There is no published information about prevalence of NAFLD in Lithuania. The metabolic syndrome is estimated to affect about 20% of the Lithuanian middle-aged urban population [15–17]. In this study we aimed to assess the prevalence of the following metabolic risk factors among men and women with NAFLD: obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes.

Material and Methods

The protocol of the study was reviewed and approved by the Lithuanian Bioethics Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the recommendations laid down by the 18th World Medical Assembly (Helsinki, 1964) and all applicable amendments.

This was an epidemiologic study. In order to ensure that the data reflect the health status of patients living in urban as well as rural areas, randomly selected family physicians throughout Lithuania were asked to participate in the study. Fifty-six family physicians agreed to take part in the study. The regions covered included Anykğčiai, Elektrėnai, Jonava, Jurbarkas, Kaunas, Kėdainiai, Klaipėda, Kretinga, Marijampolė, Mažeikiai, Palanga, Panevėžys, Plungė, Prienai, Radviliğkis, Raseiniai, Šiauliai, Šilalė, Tauragė, Utena, and Vilnius. Every physician had to include at least 10 patients. Every patient fulfilling the inclusion criteria who visited the physician on a working day for any reason was asked to take part in the study.

A total of 798 patients were recruited between September 2008 and April 2009. Patients included in the study had to be outpatients with NAFLD, aged 18–80 years old. The diagnosis of NAFLD had to be confirmed during previous consultations by means of ultrasonography, liver biopsy, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging [18,19] and documented in the patient’s record. The majority of NAFLD cases were diagnosed using ultrasonography. All patients provided written informed consent. The following exclusion criteria were applied: pregnancy, alcoholic liver disease (established diagnosis of alcoholic liver disease or confirmed alcohol intake in daily doses ≥40 g for men and ≥20 g for women), known or evidenced virus hepatitis, autoimmune hepatitis, toxic liver damage, gene pathology, and confirmed absence of liver pathology.

The following data were collected during a single patient visit: weight, height, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), age, sex, leisure-time physical activity, concomitant diseases, and use of antioxidants, cytoprotective agents, insulin secretagogues, and lipid-lowering agents. No laboratory evaluations were performed specifically for the purposes of the study. Demographic and medical data were retrieved from patients’ cards, while anthropometric parameters (height, weight, BMI and waist circumference) were measured during the study visit. Height (cm) and weight (kg) were measured with indoor clothing and without shoes. The waist circumference (cm) was measured at the level of the umbilicus, with the participant standing and breathing normally. The participants also answered questions about their leisure-time physical activity. All data were recorded anonymously into standardized Case Report Forms.

Hypertension was defined as elevated blood pressure at or above 140/90 mm Hg (130/80 mm Hg for diabetics) or a history of hypertension and use of antihypertensive medication.

Dyslipidemia was defined as abnormal fasting lipid profile (total cholesterol >5.0 mmol/l or low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol >3.0 mmol/l or high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol <1.0 mmol/l in men and <1.2 mmol/l in women or triglyceride >1.7 mmol/l).

Leisure-time physical activity was classified into 3 categories: (1) low (almost completely inactive, e.g., reading, watching television, housework, etc.), (2) moderate (some physical activity for >4 hours per week (eg, walking, cycling, light exercising, light gardening, etc.), and (3) high (vigorous physical activity for >3 hours per week, e.g., running, jogging, swimming, heavy gardening, or regular exercise or competitive sports several times per week).

BMI was calculated by dividing the individual’s body weight by the square of his/her height: BMI = weight (kg)/height2 (m2).

Abdominal obesity was defined as waist circumference >102 cm in men and >88 cm in women.

Sample size was calculated based on the following assumptions: anticipated prevalence of NAFDL is 20% (P=0.2), its absolute precision is 3% (d=0.03), and confidence level is 95%. For sample size calculation the following equation was used:

Based on the above assumptions, the minimum sample size for this study was calculated to be 780 patients.

The descriptive statistics and statistical tests for group comparisons were applied for data analysis. The χ2 test was used to assess the difference between categorical data. Parametric Student’s t-test test or non-parametric Wilcoxon test was applied to test the difference between continuous data. Statistical tests were interpreted at the 5% significance level (two-tailed). Statistical software SAS 9.1.2 was used for statistical data analysis.

Results

In total, 804 patients were recruited in the study and of these 798 were included in the analysis (6 patients were protocol violations). There were 298 (37.3%) men and 500 (62.7%) women among the study participants. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) age of patients was 58.1 (±10.7) years; range, 23 to 80 years. Women were slightly older than men (mean age, 60.2±9.6 vs. 54.5±11.4 years; p<0.05).

The prevalence of obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2) was 69.9% among study patients and it was significantly higher among women compared to men (75.4% vs. 60.7%, p<0.05); 62.4% of the men and 89.2% of the women (p<0.05) had abdominal obesity. Hypertension and dyslipidemia were also highly prevalent in this group of NAFDL patients, and metabolic risk factors were more prevalent among women (Table 1). The prevalence of diabetes was similar in both men and women; 21.9% of patients had diabetes; all except 1 were cases of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The prevalence of metabolic risk factors was compared in different age groups (≤60 years and >60 years) separately in men and in women. There were no differences in the mean BMI in the proportion of men or women with BMI >30 kg/m2 or central obesity in the 2 age groups (Table 2). The prevalence of arterial hypertension was higher among older men and women. The proportion of patients with diabetes was also significantly higher among elderly men and was numerically higher among elderly women. Dyslipidemia was more common among women aged >60 years, while no such age-related differences were observed in men.

Very few NAFDL patients (3.1%) reported high leisure-time physical activity (regular vigorous exercise, competitive sports or similar physical activity for at least 3 hours per week). Among women, the proportion of subjects reporting low leisure-time physical activity was higher than that among men (45.8 vs. 29.2%; p<0.05). Consequently, there were more men than women with moderate physical activity (66.1 vs. 52.0%; p<0.05). In both sexes, the level of leisure-time physical activity was lower in older patients (Table 3).

Two-thirds of patients (68.7%) received continuous pharmacological treatment for NAFDL. The most common medicines were cytoprotective agents, ursodeoxycholic acid, pentoxifylline, betaine or phospholipid preparations (24.9%), lipid-lowering drugs (21.3%), and antioxidants – vitamin E, N-acetylcysteine, selenium, or beta-carotene (19.1%). Insulin secretagogues (metformin, pioglitazone or rosiglitazone) were used by 11.7% of patients. Almost 30% of patients received combined treatment and the most frequent combination was a lipid-lowering drug and a cytoprotective agent (10.6%).

Discussion

In this study we found that metabolic risk factors were highly prevalent in patients with NAFLD. More than two-thirds of patients were obese, and similar proportions of patients had hypertension or dyslipidemia. Such results are consistent with published data from other countries [20]. An Italian study showed that NAFLD was associated with most of the features of the metabolic syndrome – obesity, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, hypertriglyceridemia, and systolic hypertension [4].

Data on sex differences in the prevalence of NAFLD are conflicting. Several studies reported that NAFLD is 3 to 5 times more common in men than in women [21–23], while others stated that the risk of this disease is greater among women [24]. We did not evaluate the prevalence of NAFLD; however, the number of female patients in our study was approximately 1.5-fold higher than the number of males. Besides, most of metabolic risk factors, which are also generally considered as NAFDL risk factors (obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia), were more prevalent among women compared to men. Only diabetes was equally common in both men and women.

Since the women in this study population were significantly older than the men, we conducted a further analysis to determine if these differences could have been caused by age rather than sex. The distribution of obesity parameters (mean BMI, proportion of patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 or central obesity) was similar in the 2 age groups, thus the difference observed in men and women was most likely determined by sex. Contrarily, the differences in the prevalence of arterial hypertension and diabetes seemed to be related to advanced age, as the prevalence of these diseases was higher among older men and women.

Published data on the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among Lithuanian men and women are inconsistent. A study that used the definition of International Diabetes Federation, reported that the prevalence of metabolic syndrome was almost two-fold higher among men compared to women (28.1% vs. 16.6%) (15). Other studies, which employed World Health Organization or National Cholesterol Education Program – Adult Treatment Panel III criteria, reported opposite results, showing higher prevalence among women. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among men and women increased with age [16,17]. One Lithuanian study also reported some sex-related differences in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome components in patients with acute ischemic syndromes [25]. In this study women were significantly older than men; however, the potential confounding effect of age was not analyzed.

There is no specific therapy for NAFLD that has clearly been proven effective; however several pharmacological options, including antioxidants, lipid lowering agents, hepatoprotective agents, and insulin secretagogues, have been tried with some successes [8,26,27]. In our study, two-thirds of patients received continuous pharmacological treatment for NAFDL – the most common medicines being cytoprotective agents, followed by lipid-lowering drugs and antioxidants. It is recommended to initiate pharmacological treatment only when there is no change in the course of disease after adequate lifestyle changes have been undertaken. The published results of several studies in NAFLD populations have reported that short-term moderate weight loss with regular physical activity leads to improvement in liver biochemical tests and to resolution of hepatic steatosis [28]. We had no information on weight management efforts if any taken by study participants. However, available information on leisure-time physical activity suggests that lifestyle-related therapeutic modalities were not fully utilized in this group, especially among women.

There are several limitations to the present study. The physicians who participated in the study constituted only about 3% of the family physicians in Lithuania. Although almost half of Lithuanian administrative regions were covered and efforts were made to invite physicians working in urban as well as rural areas, it is possible that the study population was not representative of the general population. Second, the enrollment of a greater proportion of women into the study, and the fact that they were older than men, may have biased the results. The effect of this potential bias was reduced by applying stratification by sex and age. The study did not include a control group. Further studies involving a control group are needed for a better understanding of true prevalence of metabolic risk factors in the population of patients with NAFDL in Lithuania.

Conclusions

Metabolic risk factors were highly prevalent among studied patients with NAFLD. Obesity, arterial hypertension, and dyslipidemia were more prevalent among women compared to men; however, the differences in the prevalence of hypertension seemed to be determined by advanced age.

References

1. Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Lee KE, Metabolic significance of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in nonobese, nondiabetic adults: Arch Intern Med, 2004; 164; 2169-75, pmid: 15505132

2. Lall CG, Aisen AM, Bansal N, Sandrasegaran K, Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Am J Roentgenol, 2008; 190; 993-1002, pmid: 18356447

3. Choudhury J, Sanyal AJ, Clinical aspects of fatty liver disease: Semin Liver Dis, 2004; 24; 349-62, pmid: 15605303

4. Lazo M, Clark JM, The epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a global perspective: Semin Liver Dis, 2008; 28; 339-50, pmid: 18956290

5. Bedogni G, Miglioli L, Masutti F, Prevalence of and risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the Dionysos nutrition and liver study: Hepatology, 2005; 42; 44-52, pmid: 15895401

6. Akbar DH, Kawther AH, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome: what we know and what we don’t know: Med Sci Monit, 2006; 12(1); RA23-26, pmid: 16369477

7. Marchesini G, Brizi M, Bianchi G, Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a feature of the metabolic syndrome: Diabetes, 2001; 50; 1844-50, pmid: 11473047

8. Rector RS, Thyfault JP, Wei Y, Ibdah JA, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and the metabolic syndrome: an update: World J Gastroenterol, 2008; 14; 185-92, pmid: 18186553

9. Marchesini G, Bugianesi E, Forlani G, Nonalcoholic fatty liver, steatohepatitis, and the metabolic syndrome: Hepatology, 2003; 37; 917-23, pmid: 12668987

10. Marceau P, Biron S, Hould FS, Liver pathology and the metabolic syndrome X in severe obesity: J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 1999; 84; 1513-17, pmid: 10323371

11. Kahn R, Buse J, Ferrannini E, Stern M, The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal. Joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes: Diabetologia, 2005; 48; 1684-99, pmid: 16079964

12. Ford ES, Risks for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes associated with the metabolic syndrome: a summary of the evidence: Diabetes Care, 2005; 28; 1769-78, pmid: 15983333

13. Simmons RK, Alberti KG, Gale EA, The metabolic syndrome: useful concept or clinical tool? Report of a WHO Expert Consultation: Diabetologia, 2010; 53; 600-5, pmid: 20012011

14. Stolar M, Metabolic syndrome: controversial but useful: Cleve Clin J Med, 2007; 74; 199-202, pmid: 17375800

15. Gustiene O, Slapikas R, Klumbiene JThe prevalence of metabolic syndrome in middle-aged in Kaunas population, Metabolinio sindromo paplitimas tarp vidutinio amžiaus Kauno gyventojų: Medicina (Kaunas), 2005; 41; 867-76, pmid: 16272835

16. Cerniauskiene LR, Reklaitiene R, Luksiene DIAssociation of metabolic syndrome with ischemic heart disease among middle-aged Kaunas population, Metabolinio sindromo ryğys su iğemine ğirdies liga tarp vidutinio amžiaus Kauno gyventojų: Medicina (Kaunas), 2005; 41; 435-41, pmid: 15947528

17. Paunksnis A, Bojarskiene F, Cimbalas A, Relation between cataract and metabolic syndrome and its components: Eur J Ophthalmol, 2007; 17; 605-14, pmid: 17671938

18. Loria P, Adinolfi LE, Bellentani S, Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. A decalogue from the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver (AISF) Expert Committee: Dig Liver Dis, 2010; 42; 272-82, pmid: 20171943

19. Fan JG, Jia JD, Li YM, Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: update 2010: J Dig Dis, 2011; 12; 38-44, pmid: 21276207

20. Grattagliano I, Portincasa P, Palmieri VO, Palasciano G, Managing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: recommendations for family physicians: Can Fam Physician, 2007; 53; 857-63, pmid: 17872748

21. Bahcecioglu IH, Koruk M, Yilmaz O, Demographic and clinicopathological characteristics of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in the east-southeastern Anatolia regions in Turkey: Med Princ Pract, 2006; 15; 62-68, pmid: 16340230

22. Loguercio C, De Girolamo V, de Sio I, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in an area of southern Italy: main clinical, histological, and pathophysiological aspects: J Hepatol, 2001; 35; 568-74, pmid: 11690701

23. Weston SR, Leyden W, Murphy R, Racial and ethnic distribution of nonalcoholic fatty liver in persons with newly diagnosed chronic liver disease: Hepatology, 2005; 41; 372-79, pmid: 15723436

24. Malnick SD, Beergabel M, Knobler H, Non-alcoholic fatty liver: a common manifestation of a metabolic disorder: QJM, 2003; 96; 699-709, pmid: 14500857

25. Zaliūnas R, Slapikas R, Babarskiene R, The prevalence of the metabolic syndrome components and their combinations in men and women with acute ischemic syndromes: Medicina (Kaunas), 2008; 44; 521-28, pmid: 18695348

26. Adams LA, Angulo P, Lindor KD, Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: CMAJ, 2005; 172; 899-905, pmid: 15795412

27. Abel T, Fehér J, Dinya E, Safety and efficacy of combined ezetimibe/simvastatin treatment and simvastatin monotherapy in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Med Sci Monit, 2009; 15(12); MS6-11, pmid: 19946244

28. Duvnjak M, Lerotić I, Barsić N, Pathogenesis and management issues for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: World J Gastroenterol, 2007; 13; 4539-50, pmid: 17729403

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750