Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

01 May 2012: Basic Research  

Laparoscopic simple enucleation and coagulation on tumor bed using argon beam coagulator for treating small renal cell carcinomas: An animal study followed by clinical application

Changwen Zhang BCEF , Yong Xu AG , Zhihong Zhang E , Baomin Qiao D , Kuo Yang C , Ranlu Liu E , Baojie Ma F

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.882729

Med Sci Monit 2012; 18(5): BR193-197

0 Comments

Background

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 2% of all solid tumors and is the urologic malignancy associated with the highest mortality rate due to the lack of efficient systemic therapy [1]. In recent years, with the increasing number of asymptomatic, small, lower-stage, and incidentally detected renal tumors, laparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery (LNSS) has been widely accepted and has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative treatment for small RCC with a normal contralateral kidney. Early studies showed NSS could offer equally effective local control and a similar disease-specific survival rate compared with radical nephrectomy (RN) for treating RCC of <4 cm in their greatest dimension [2,3]. Many studies have shown that a certain amount of normal tissue should be excised along with the tumor to avoid the risk of local recurrence. However, Sutherland et al. [4] argued that the margin width was irrelevant to the possibility of local recurrence if the tumor was completely resected. Some researchers challenged the accepted wisdom, and proposed simple enucleation to the patients who followed surgery indication. However, due to the risks, such as local tumor recurrence and excessive bleeding from the renal parenchyma, simple enucleation is still confronted with technical challenges. Some ablative technology instruments, such as ultrasonic shears, microwave tissue coagulator, argon beam coagulator and bipolar electrocautery, have been used with solid vascular organs (e.g., liver, spleen and kidney) to control parenchymal bleeding, and were reported to be useful and less invasive [5,6]. However, some complications (e.g., urinoma and renal arteriovenous fistula) were reported with the application of these instruments in NSS [6]. There is no established method that is widely accepted and applied.

We think that tumor size, location, and proper coagulator devices should be considered to avoid these complications. Recently, we succeeded in ablating the wound tissue bed during NSS using argon beam coagulator in an animal experiment. Additionally, 30 small RCC patients underwent laparoscopic simple enucleation and tumor bed ablation with an argon beam coagulator from June 2006 to April 2011. The patients were followed up for a median time of more than 37 months, with very positive outcomes in most cases.

Material and Methods

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT:

The care and treatment of the experimental animals conformed to the guidelines for the ethical treatment of laboratory animals of the Tianjin Medical University animal laboratory.

Sixteen rabbits weighting 2~3 kg were obtained from the animal laboratory of Tianjin Medical University (Tianjin China), and housed in a controlled environment with an ambient room temperature of 24°C. The rabbits were randomly divided into 4 equal groups. Group A was without renal artery occlusion, the wound tissue bed was ablated with an argon beam coagulator (Beamer plus, Conmed Corporation, USA) during NSS by the standard of stopping bleeding, and the treatment time was 4 seconds. In Group B, on the basis of group A, the wound tissue bed was re-ablated for 2 seconds with an argon beam coagulator. Group C had renal artery occlusion, the wound tissue bed was ablated with an argon beam coagulator by the standard of stanching bleeding, and the treatment time was 2 seconds. In Group D, upon the basis of group C, the wound tissue bed was re-ablated for 2 seconds with an argon beam coagulator.

After the preparation, the rabbits were placed in the supine position throughout the operation. Pentobarbital sodium 3% (1 ml/kg) was injected via the ear vein. Surgery was performed through an abdominal mid-line incision 15 cm in length, and the left kidney was exposed. In Group A, after the upper or lower pole of the kidney had been enucleated about 1 cm3, the wound tissue bed was ablated using an argon beam coagulator for stanching bleeding, with argon flow rate was 6.0 L/min, the power was 90 w, and the treatment time was 2 seconds. In Group B the wound tissue bed was re-sprayed for 2 seconds after stanching bleeding with an argon beam coagulator, and other procedures were the same as that of Group A. In Group C, after blocking the renal pedicle with an arterial clip clamp, we enucleated the tissue about 1cm3 in the upper or lower pole of the kidney, then ablated the wound tissue bed with an argon beam coagulator. When there was no bleeding, we removed the arterial clip clamp, and the renal pedicle blocking time was <30 minutes. The ablation time was 2 seconds. In Group D the wound tissue bed was re-sprayed for 2 seconds with the argon beam coagulator after stanching bleeding following group C (Figure 1A). Three weeks later, all the renal wound-tissue specimens were harvested and examined under an optical microscope after being fixed, embedded, sectioned and stained by HE.

CLINICAL STUDY:

Thirty patients underwent laparoscopic simple enucleation and tumor bed ablation using the argon beam coagulator from June 2006 to April 2011. The basic operative indications were small and incidentally detected renal tumors which were solitary, located peripherally, well demarcated, exophytic and no less than 1 cm away from the kidney collecting system on computerized tomography (CT) scan (Figure 1B). The preoperative diagnosis was T1N0M0 renal cell carcinoma in all patients. Preoperative patient characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Under general anesthesia and with 16F urethral catheter being inserted, patients were placed in a lateral decubitus position, securing both arms on the sides; proper padding was placed at all pressure points. A 2 cm incision was made on the posterior axillary line across the twelfth rib costal margin in the left lumbar region and the peritoneum was pushed away using a finger, to expose to the perirenal space. A balloon device for the dilation of retroperitoneum was inserted into the perirenal space, and the perirenal space was enlarged with 800 ml air pumped into the balloon. After the pneumoperitoneum was created, a 25° laparoscope was inserted above the midaxillary line, across the spina iliaca. Additional working ports (5 mm) were placed under the anterior axillary line across the eleventh rib costal margin. The kidney was exposed by the opening of Gerota’s fascia. After enucleating the tumor about 1 cm margin away from the capsular using an ultrasonically activated scalpel (UAS), we ablated the tumor bed with an argon beam coagulator for 6~10 seconds, and then secured the wound tissue bed with assimilable gauze (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

SPSS Statistics 17.0 was applied to analyze data. The difference between 2 groups was assessed using the independent t-test and P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT:

All 16 rabbits survived the operation and healed satisfactorily. By the histological examination, calcification was found inside the area of necrosis, and compact structure in scab. Moreover, granulation tissue was found between the scab and the renal tissue (Figure 1C,D). The scab depth of the rabbits’ kidneys in Groups A, B, C and D was 2.76±0.17 mm, 3.15±0.15 mm, 2.28±0.16 mm and 2.75±0.06 mm, respectively. Group A differed significantly from groups B and C (P=0.012, 0.007), and group D differed significantly from groups B & C (P=0.002, 0.002), but there was no significant difference between group A and group D (P=0.915) (Figure 2).

CLINICAL STUDY:

All 30 patients successfully underwent laparoscopic simple enucleation and tumor bed ablation with an argon beam coagulator. The mean operative time was 182 minutes (range from 100 to 252 minutes), and the mean blood loss was 280 ml (range from 100 to 400 ml). Urine leakage persisted for 16 days in 1 patient, and was managed conservatively. Another patient showed allergy to assimilable gauze, and the fluid effused via catheter drainage, which was taken away 1 month later, while the median duration of catheter drainage was 4 days (range from 3 to 6 days) in other patients. There were no other postoperative complications (e.g., hemorrhage, urinoma, renal function insufficiency and infection) recorded during the early postoperative period (within the first 30 days). No patients required blood transfusion. Postoperatively, all patients could eat and walk on day 2. The median time of full convalescence was 10 days (range from 6 to 30 days).

Histopathological diagnosis showed renal cell carcinoma in all 30 patients, including clear cell renal cell carcinoma in 21, papillary renal cell carcinoma in 5, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma in 2, multilocular cystic renal cell carcinoma in 1, and mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma in 1. All the patients were followed up and the median time was 37 months (range from 8 to 54 months). One patient died of unrelated cancer causes15 months after kidney surgery, without any evidence of tumor recurrence. None of the other 29 patients with renal cell carcinoma treated laparoscopically showed local recurrence or distant metastasis when examined by CT scan. Renal functions were stable in all patients during the whole follow-up period, with a median postoperative creatinine level of 92 umol/l (range from 75 to 104 umol/l).

Discussion

Historically, RN as described by Robson et al. has been the gold standard for patients with localized RCC [7]. However, the number of asymptomatic, small, lower-stage, and incidentally detected renal tumors greatly increased as a result of the wide-spread usage of ultrasound and CT scan for evaluating other abdominal processes. Other therapeutic approaches have been explored, such as cryoablation, high-intensity focused US, radiofrequency ablation, and simple enucleation [8]. Meanwhile, the long-term effectiveness of these emerging technologies remains to be determined, and there is controversy regarding how these patients should be treated. With the development of laparoscopic technique, laparoscopic surgery has been widely used in many diseases, such as ovarian endometriomas, adrenal gland neoplasms and renal carcinomas [9–11]. It was reported that LNSS was easier and safer than RN, and its oncological results appeared to be equal with RN for small localized tumors. Meanwhile, the application of UAS, laser, microwave coagulator and Water Jet Cutting System promoted the development of LNSS [6,12,13]. The choice of the patients for NSS had been changed from the cases with solitary kidney or bilateral renal carcinoma before to those with a normal contralateral kidney [14]. Lapini et al. [15] found that simple enucleation was a safe and acceptable approach. In the present study we successfully performed an animal experiment of ablating the wound tissue bed during NSS with an argon beam coagulator. More importantly, 30 small RCC patients underwent laparoscopic simple enucleation and tumor bed ablation with an argon beam coagulator, with very good outcome in most cases.

Simple enucleation has been regarded as a challenging surgery because of its associated complications (e.g., hemorrhage) local recurrence, urinary fistula and renal dysfunction. Uzzo et al. [16] reported that the rate of acute or delayed hemorrhage ranged from 1.3~7.9% in simple enucleation. In our study, after enucleating the tumor, we widely ablated the tumor bed using the argon beam coagulator, which caused little blood loss in the tumor bed, and no delayed hemorrhage complications were found during the early postoperative period. Thus, the argon beam coagulator may be a good technique for stanching in simple enucleation. Until recently, surgical practice for NSS is to have a >1 cm margin of normal tissue around the tumor. However, the optimal resection margin is still under discussion because satellite lesions can be found more than 1.0 cm beyond the primary tumor [17]. Some recent studies showed that the width of the margin seemed less important, and NSS with a smaller margin was also safe and effective in tumor control [18]. During the operation, we enucleated the tumor with a 1 cm margin away from the capsular, and then coagulated all resection beds routinely using an argon beam coagulator. During a long follow-up, no recurrence was found. Lapini et al. [15] similarly used diathermy spray coagulation or argon beam laser on the tumor bed, and also achieved good results. More importantly, coagulation destroyed another rim of parenchyma up to 2~3 mm in our study, which caused the residual tumor to be necrotic. This might explain why simple enucleation provides the same results as NSS, which needs a larger rim of healthy tissue to be resected together with the tumor. Urinary fistula is one of the most common complications after NSS, with a reported rate of 6.5% [16]. The low rate of morbidity in our study may be due to the strict patient selection criteria and more renal parenchyma left with the technique of enucleation.

Kane et al. [19] reported that with temporary renal artery occlusion, the average warm ischemia time was 43±10 minutes (range from 25 to 65 minutes), and the serum creatinine increased after surgery, but the differences from the preoperative value were not statistically significant. They also found that there were no differences in blood loss, operative time, or margin status between the occlusion and non-occlusion patients. Nevertheless, Campbell et al. [20] concluded that the rates of postoperative acute renal failure after open partial nephrectomy can approach 14% with artery occlusion. Regarding the safety of arterial occlusion and warm ischemia, some investigators have been prompted to study non-ischemic hemostatic techniques, including cable tie tourniquet, radio frequency ablation and so on. Despite these efforts, the techniques are still unproved. In our study, we coagulated the tumor bed with an argon beam coagulator without blocking the artery, which not only limited the tissue injury during the exposure of the renal pedicle, but left wider adjacent normal parenchyma tissue. More residual renal function could be compromised, which is important, especially for the patients with only 1 kidney.

The present studies in patients with T1 tumors revealed that NSS could be safely performed and resulted in a very low percentage of progression (4.5%) and renal cancer-related death (3%) [21]. Roos et al. [22] reported that NSS could be considered as the standard care for most RCC masses when feasible, and they pointed out that the tumor location, not the tumor size, appeared to be the limiting factor for NSS. Until now, there has been no definite evidence of a theoretical advantage of NSS over simple enucleation. The research by Pertia et al. nicely provides additional evidence in favor of simple enucleation in cT1a and cT1b RCC. In their limited series of 30 patients, the complication rate was very low, with only 1 urinary leakage, and no hemorrhagic complications. Five- and 7-year cancer-specific survival rates were impressive, at 100% and 96.5%, respectively [15], similar to our study. During the long follow-up period, we did not observe any local recurrence, and we also got high cancer-specific and recurrence-free survival rates.

Conclusions

Simple enucleation and coagulation on the tumor bed using an argon beam coagulator has the advantage of preserving more kidney parenchyma and avoiding major bleeding and the opening of the collecting system, which is also associated with a reported long-term incidence of local recurrence similar to that of partial nephrectomy [18]. However, the indication should be strictly restricted to renal tumors that are small, solitary, well-demarcated, located peripherally, exophytic and no less than 1 cm away from the kidney collecting system on CT scan, in order to minimize serious complications secondary to unexpected collateral damage to surrounding structures.

References

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E, Cancer Statistics, 2010: CA Cancer J Clin, 2010 caac.20073

2. Carini M, Minervini A, Serni S, Nephron-Sparing Surgery: Current Developments and Controversies: European Urology, 2007; 51; 12-14, pmid: 17010506

3. Becker F, Siemer S, Humke U, Elective Nephron Sparing Surgery Should Become Standard Treatment for Small Unilateral Renal Cell Carcinoma: Long-term Survival Data of 216 Patients: European Urology, 2006; 49; 308-13, pmid: 16359779

4. Sutherland SE, Resnick MI, Maclennan GT, Goldman HB, Does The Size of The Surgical Margin in Partial Nephrectomy for Renal Cell Cancer Really Matter?: J Urol, 2002; 167; 61-64, pmid: 11743276

5. Tabuse K, Basic knowledge of a microwave tissue coagulator and its clinical applications: J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, 1998; 5; 165-72, pmid: 9745083

6. Terai A, Ito N, Yoshimura K, Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using Microwave Tissue Coagulator for Small Renal Tumors: Usefulness and Complications: Eur Urol, 2004; 45; 744-48, pmid: 15149746

7. Robson CJ, Churchill BM, Anderson W, The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: J Urol, 1969; 10; 297-301, pmid: 5765875

8. Murphy DP, Gill IS, Energy-based renal tumor ablation: a review: Semin Urol Oncol, 2001; 19; 133-40, pmid: 11354533

9. Mossa BEV, Tucci S, Rega C, Laparoscopic surgery for the management of ovarian endometriomas: Med Sci Monit, 2010; 16(4); MT45-50, pmid: 20357728

10. Rizek P, Gorecki P, Lindenmayer A, Moktan S, Laparoscopic Adrenalectomy for Bilateral Metachronous Aldosteronomas: JSLS, 2011; 15; 100-4, pmid: 21902953

11. Liatsikos E, Kallidonis P, Do M, Laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy: technical issues and outcome: World J Urol, 2011

12. Hamasaki T, Kondo Y, Matuzawa I, Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Using a Microwave Tissue Coagulator for Treating Small Peripheral Renal Tumors: J Nihon Med Sch, 2004; 71(6); 392-98

13. Miller DC, Hollingsworth JM, Hafez KS, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK, Partial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Masses: An Emerging Quality of Care Concern?: J Urol, 2006; 175; 853-58, pmid: 16469564

14. Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, EAU Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2010 Update: European Association of Urology Web site http://wwwuroweborg/guidelines/online-guidelines/

15. Lapini A, Serni S, Minervini A, Progression and Long-term Survival After Simple Enucleation for The Elective Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Experience in 107 Patients: J Urol, 2005; 174; 57-59, pmid: 15947577

16. Uzzo RG, Novick AC, Nephron Sparing Surgery for Renal Tumors: Indications, Techniques and Outcomes: J Urol, 2001; 166; 6-18, pmid: 11435813

17. Li Q-L, Guan H-W, Zhang Q-P, Optimal Margin in Nephron-Sparing Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma 4 cm or Less: Eur Urol, 2003; 44; 448-51, pmid: 14499679

18. Carini M, Minervini A, Masieri L, Simple Enucleation for the Treatment of PT1a Renal Cell Carcinoma: Our 20-Year Experience: Eur Urol, 2006; 50; 1263-71, pmid: 16787695

19. Kane CJ, Mitchell JA, Meng MV, Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with temporary arterial occlusion: description of technique and renal functional outcomes: Urology, 2004; 63; 241-46, pmid: 14972462

20. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Streem SB, Complications of nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: J Urol, 1994; 151; 1177-80, pmid: 8158754

21. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, A Prospective, Randomised EORTC Intergroup Phase 3 Study Comparing the Oncologic Outcome of Elective Nephron-Sparing Surgery and Radical Nephrectomy for Low-Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma: Eur Urol, 2011; 59; 543-52, pmid: 21186077

22. Roos FC, Brenner W, Müller M, Oncologic Long-term Outcome of Elective Nephron-sparing Surgery Versus Radical Nephrectomy in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma Stage pT1b or Greater in a Matched-pair Cohort: Urology, 2011; 77; 803-8, pmid: 21145093

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750