01 June 2012: Basic Research
Acrylonitrile-induced gastric toxicity in rats: The role of xanthine oxidase
Fahad A. Al-Abbasi
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.882896
Med Sci Monit 2012; 18(6): BR208-214
Bacground
ACN is an extensively produced aliphatic nitrile [1] used in the synthesis of acrylic fibers, resins and plastics [2,3]. ACN is detected in acrylonitrile-styrene copolymers used in manufacture of kitchen utensils and nitrile-butadiene rubber gloves [4]. It is also used in coating membranes for Langerhans islets implants [5] and high permeable dialysis tubing [6]. ACN has been detected in drinking water [7], food products [8] and car exhaust [9]. ACN has been measured in the vapor phase of mainstream tobacco smoke at a concentration of 18.5 μg per cigarette [10]. In 2007, 94 facilities released a total of about 7 million pounds of ACN, most of which was released by 2 facilities to on-site hazardous waste underground injection wells [11]. ACN is possibly carcinogenic to humans [Group 2B] [2]. Animal studies indicated that ACN possesses mutagenic [12], carcinogenic [13], immunotoxic [14], embryotoxic [15] and neurotoxic properties [16]. Clinical studies indicated increased risk of lung cancer, brain cancer and renal cell carcinoma in some exposure categories 17,18].
The gastrointestinal tract (GIT) represents an important target site for ACN toxicity. ACN was reported to induce hemorrhagic focal superficial gastric mucosal necrosis and erosions in rats [19]. The mechanism of such toxicity was suggested to involve induction of oxidative stress [13]. Initial metabolic activation of ACN was found to be essential for the production of toxic effects [20]. It was reported that CYP 2E1 is the main enzyme in the cytochromes P450 (CYP450) family involved in the bioactivation of ACN [21]. However, the levels of CYP 450 in the GIT are much lower than those present in the liver, which is not the main target for ACN toxicity [22]. Therefore, other metabolic enzymatic and non-enzymatic pathways were suggested to explain the extra-hepatic metabolism of ACN and other nitriles. These include reactive oxygen species (ROS) [23], myeloperoxidase [24] and lactoperoxidase [25]. Reactive oxygen species generated by the xanthine oxidase(XO)/xanthine(X)/iron (Fe) system have been shown to activate the structurally related compound dibromoacetonitrile (DBAN) to cyanide [26].
Xanthine oxidase is highly localized in the GIT [27]. In addition, XO is considered one of the important sources of ROS in the GIT [28]. This enzyme is usually present in the dehydrogenase form, xanthine dehydrogenase (XD), which uses nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) instead of O2 as the electron acceptor. Alternatively, oxidation of substrates by XO results in the generation of superoxide anions (O2·−) and H2O2[29]. It is well recognized that conversion of XD to XO is an important pathway for the production of (O2·−) under some pathological conditions [30]. Several reports have indicated that XO is important in ischemic injury of the intestines, hypovolemic shock, renal transplantation and skin grafts [31,32]. In addition, XO activity increases in hypoxic conditions [33]. Furthermore, several studies have revealed that XO inhibitors such as allopurinol can protect against chemically induced injury in the GIT [34]. This suggests that enhancement of XO activity might be an important determinant in the gastrointestinal toxicity of many chemicals. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to evaluate the role of XO in ACN-induced gastric toxicity in rats.
Material and Methods
CHEMICALS:
ACN, GSH, 5,5Ndithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoicacid), NAD, dithiothreitol (DTT), xanthine, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), pyruvate, superoxide dismutase (SOD), cytochrome C, allopurinol, diethyl maleate (DEM), 2-thiobarbituric acid, 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypmpane, phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF) and crystalline bovine serum albumin were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other chemicals were of analytical grade and of the highest purity commercially available.
ANIMALS AND ANIMAL TREATMENT:
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (150–200 g) were obtained from the animal facility of King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. The animals were provided with standard pellet diet and water
For the time-course study, 50 rats were randomly assigned, 10 for each time point (6 rats subjected to ACN treatment and 4 rats as a control). Animals were fasted overnight (16 h) prior to receiving any treatment. Treated animals received a single oral dose of ACN (25 mg/kg, dissolved in distilled water). This dose is approximately equivalent to the oral LD12.5 of ACN in rats [35]. Control rats received distilled water. Dosing volume was always 5 ml/kg body weight. Rats were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, at 1, 2, 4, 6 and 12 h after treatment. An abdominal incision was made in each rat and the stomach was immediately dissected out. Tissues were immediately frozen on dry ice and stored at −70°C for subsequent biochemical analyses. For the dose-response study, the same above-mentioned precautions were applied. Twenty-four rats were randomly divided into 4 groups (6 rats in each group). Control animals received distilled water, while treated groups received a single dose of ACN (10, 25 or 50 mg/kg). At 2 h after dosing, animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and stomachs were immediately collected and handled as previously described. Based on the results obtained from the time-course and dose-response experiments, the effects of pretreatment with allopurinol or DEM were investigated. Thirty-six rats were equally divided into 6 groups. Control rats were given distilled water. The other rats represented the treated groups. The first treated group received ACN (25 mg/kg), the second group received allopurinol (50 mg/kg) and the third group received allopurinol (50 mg/kg) 1 h prior to ACN (25 mg/kg). The fourth group received DEM (100 mg/kg) and the fifth group was given DEM (100 mg/kg) 1 h prior to ACN (25 mg/kg). All animals wert sacrificed 2 h after the last treatment by cervical dislocation and stomachs were immediately collected. The same aforementioned precautions and handling procedures were applied. Doses of ACN, allopurinol and DEM were chosen based on preliminary experimental trials and were consistent with those in the literature [36,37].
PREPARATION OF TISSUES:
Stomachs were minced into small pieces and divided into 2 portions. The first portion was used for determination of XO and total XO/XD activity. Gastric tissues were homogenized in ice-cold potassium phosphate-EDTA buffer (potassium phosphate 0.05 M, EDTA 0.1 M; pH 7.8) containing 10 mM DTT and 1 mM PMSF. DTT and PMSF were added to prevent any artificial conversion of XD to XO during the homogenization procedure. Homogenization was achieved by 3 5-second bursts over a 5-min period to a fine suspension, using an Ultramax homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 27000
The second portion of the minced stomachs was homogenized with ice-cold potassium phosphate-EDTA buffer (potassium phosphate 0.05 M, EDTA 0.1 M; pH 7.8). Homogenization was achieved by 3 5-second bursts over a 5-min period to a fine suspension, using an Ultramax homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged at 2500 g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was used for determination of GSH content, (O2·−) production and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) formation. Protein concentration was always determined parallel to any estimation in either type of supernatants.
ASSAY OF XO AND TOTAL XD/XO ACTIVITY:
Briefly, 400 μl of each sample was incubated at 37°C for 3 h with xanthine (100 μM) to measure XO, or with xanthine and NAD+ (300 μM), LDH (70 U) and pyruvate (1.75 mM) to measure total XO and XD activity. The reactions were stopped by adding perchloric acid and the precipitate was removed by centrifugation. Uric acid content of the supernatant was determined spectrophotometrically at 295 nm. XO activity was expressed either as mU/mg protein or as percentage of the total XO/XD activity. One unit of XO is defined as the enzyme activity required for the formation of 1 μmol of uric acid per min [38].
:
Generation of (O2·−) was measured by the SOD-inhibited reduction of ferricytochrome C [39]. The supernatant (200 μI) of each sample was incubated with xanthine (50 μM) and cytochrome C (10 μM) at 37°C for 15 min. Allopurinol (1 mM) was added to stop the reaction. The generation of (O2·−) was detected by measuring the reduction of cytochrome C at 550 nm. The reaction was terminated by centrifugation at 12 000 × g at 4°C for 4 min. The difference in absorbance of the supernatant fluid in the presence or absence of SOD was determined in a spectrophotometer at 550 nm and the amount of reduced ferricytochrome C was calculated based on an extinction coefficient of 21.0 mM/cm.
DETERMINATION OF REDUCED GLUTATHIONE (GSH):
The levels of GSH in gastric tissues were determined by measuring total soluble sulfhydryl content, using 5,5′-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid). Samples were prepared for non-protein fraction using equal volumes of 10% trichloroacetic acid solution. The protein precipitate was removed by centrifugation at 10 000 × g at 4°C for 10 min. The supernatants were spectrophotometrically assayed for sulfhydryl concentration [40].
DETERMINATION OF LIPID PEROXIDATION:
Lipid peroxidation was determined colorimetrically by measuring the tissue content of TBARS [41]. Briefly, 1,1,3,3-tetraethoxypropane in water was used to produce different concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA); these solutions were used as TBARS standards. Thiobarbituric acid (TBA) and 1% H3PO4 were added to homogenates and heated to boiling for 45 min. TBA adducts were extracted with n-butanol. The TBARS concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the absorbance at 535 nm.
DETERMINATION OF PROTEIN CONCENTRATION:
Protein concentration of enzyme samples was determined using bovine serum albumin as a standard [42].
DATA ANALYSIS:
The GraphPad Prism version 4 (GraphPad Software, Inc. La Jolla, CA, USA) computer program was used to conduct regression analysis and to plot collected data. Data are expressed as mean ±SD. Assessment of the results was performed using one-way ANOVA procedure followed by Bonferroni multiple comparison test using Software GraphPad InStat 3 (GraphPad Software, Inc. La Jolla, CA, USA). The 0.05 level of probability was used as the criterion for significance.
Results
The results from the time-course study of the effect of ACN on the enzymatic activity of XO and the oxidative status of the gastric tissues are shown in Figure 1. Oral administration of ACN (25 mg/kg) caused a significant enhancement in XO activity in gastric tissues (Figure 1A). Maximum XO activity was observed at 2 h after ACN treatment and amounted to 476% of the control enzymatic activity. However, XO activity was almost normal at 12 h after ACN treatment. GSH levels throughout the time-course experiment are depicted in Figure 1B. It was obvious that ACN caused a statistically significant depletion in GSH levels at 1 and 2 h after exposure to ACN. Maximum depletion was observed at 2 h (53.7% of the control value). However, gastric GSH levels returned to control value at 6 and 12 h. (O2·−) production is illustrated in Figure 1C. It was significantly enhanced at all time points and reached its maximum value at 4 h (an approximately 13-fold increase compared to the corresponding control value). A similar pattern was observed when assessing lipid peroxidation in gastric tissues (Figure 1D). Lipid peroxidation was significantly increased at almost all time points. The highest level of TBARS (determined as MDA) was observed at 2 h (an approximately 4-fold increase compared to the corresponding control value).
Based on the data obtained from the time-course experiment, a dose-response experiment was performed. ACN was tested at doses of 10, 25 and 50 mg/kg and animals were sacrificed at 2 h after ACN treatment. The results of the dose-response experiment are shown in Table 1. XO activity was significantly increased by administration of ACN. The highest dose of ACN (50 mg/kg) accelerated the conversion of XD to XO as the enzymatic activity of XO was elevated up to 36.99% compared with a value of 7.09% of the total XD/XO activity in control rats. ACN caused a significant depletion of gastric GSH in a dose-related manner. A strong negative correlation existed between the levels of GSH and the percentage enhancement in XO activity (Figure 2). The correlation coefficient was −0.997. (O2·−) production was drastically elevated in a dose-related manner. The highest dose of ACN caused an approximately 16-fold increase in (O2·−) production and a 5-fold increase in lipid peroxidation as compared to the control value.
To substantiate the role of XO and GSH depletion in ACN-induced toxicity, a third experiment was performed. This experiment was an extension of the dose-response experiment. ACN was used as a single oral dose of 25 mg/kg and rats were sacrificed 2 h later. The data in Figure 3 indicate the impact of modulating XO activity or GSH level on ACN toxicity. XO activity was significantly inhibited by prior administration of allopurinol (50 mg/kg). Allopurinol alone did not affect any of the assessed parameters. It significantly protected against the rise in XO activity compared to the ACN alone-treated group. Allopurinol could also inhibit GSH depletion and (O2·−) production compared to the ACN alone-treated group. However, allopurinol did not exhibit any significant protection against ACN-induced increase in MDA formation. DEM (100 mg/kg) significantly enhanced XO activity, depleted GSH and increased (O2·−) and MDA production. Pretreatment with DEM significantly aggravated the toxic manifestations of ACN toxicity. Of special concern, XO activity was elevated from 26.04% (ACN-alone group) to 39.20% (DEM + ACN group) of the total XO/XD activity. Simultaneously, an almost 2-fold increase in (O2·−) production was observed in the DEM + ACN group compared to the can-alone group.
Discussion
Oxidative stress and generation of ROS mediate cellular injury in the GIT. One important source of the cytotoxic ROS is XO [43]. Previous studies have indicated that GIT is the primary target of ACN toxicity in experimental animals [13]. The mechanism of toxicity of the structurally related compound, DBAN, was shown to involve activation of XO [26]. Therefore, the present work was designed to evaluate the potential role of XO in ACN-induced gastric toxicity in rats.
The toxic insult of ACN in gastric tissues was examined in a time-course experiment and in a dose-response experiment. The obtained results suggest that ACN toxicity in the stomach is associated with a significant elevation in XO activity. It has been reported that ACN is bioactivated
Gastrointestinal tissues, like other tissues, possess different protective antioxidant scavengers and enzymes. GSH represents one of the most important cellular defenses against oxidative insult [45]. The present study revealed that ACN treatment caused marked GSH depletion in rat stomach. This is in agreement with the known GSH-depleting properties of ACN [2]. ACN can be metabolized by glutathione transferase (GST)-mediated conjugation to GSH, where it is eliminated as mercapturic acid derivatives [46]. Previous studies with 14C ACN have shown that ACN covalently binds to thiol groups of proteins [47] and tissue macromolecules and nucleic acids [48]. Thus, GSH-depleting properties of ACN could be attributed to enzymatic conjugation and/or direct binding with thiol groups, which in turn resulted in enhanced lipid peroxidation. Importantly, a strong negative correlation was observed between XO activity and GSH level in the dose-response experiment, suggesting that GSH depletion may activate conversion of XD to XO in gastric tissues.
ACN toxicity was accompanied by increased generation of (O2·−). This finding can be attributed to the ACN-induced hypoxia and enhancement of XO activity. XO, in the presence of xanthine, reduces O2 to (O2·−) [49]. Other potent oxidants can also be generated as by-products of this reduction [50]. This process is greatly enhanced in hypoxia, with increased oxygen free radicals production [51]. In addition, the data indicate that ACN toxic insult resulted in significant enhancement of lipid peroxidation processes in gastric tissues. This is consistent with the well-known ability of ACN to increase lipid peroxidation in rat liver [52]. The observed ACN-induced GSH depletion may provide a satisfactory explanation of this finding. Thus, “vicious cycle” could be a better description of the mutual influence between GSH depletion and XO conversion.
The increase in XO activity could represent an important source of oxidants involved in ACN-induced toxicity in gastric tissues and this possibility was further substantiated. Allopurinol, a XO inhibitor [53], was given to animals prior to ACN in a dose-response experiment. Allopurinol provided significant protection against most of the toxic manifestations of ACN insult. However, allopurinol did not exhibit any significant protection against the increased lipid peroxidation induced by ACN. This suggests that lipid peroxidation is an early step in ACN toxicity and occurs before the enhanced XO activity. This suggestion is supported by results of previous studies reporting that changes in lipid peroxidation markers occur earlier than conversion of XD to XO in hypoxic cells [44].
The role of GSH depletion was further evaluated in the process of XO activation. Rats were pretreated with the GSH-depleting agent DEM. This dramatically enhanced the conversion of XD to XO and aggravated all the toxic manifestation of ACN. These data were supported by the observation that GSH depletion enhanced conversion of XD to XO in rat liver [37]. The exact mechanism of this conversion is still unclear; however, GSH depletion seems to be a critical step in ACN-induced conversion of gastric XD to XO. However, a previous
Conclusions
In present study indicates that enhancement of XO activity is implicated in ACN-induced gastric damage in rats.
References
1. Reisch MS, Top 50 chemicals production stagnated last year: Chem Eng News, 1992; 70; 16-22
2. IARC, Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Re-evaluation of some organic chemicals, hydrazine, and hydrogen peroxide: Compounds reviewed in plenary sessions (comprehensive monographs), 1999; 71(1); 43
3. CEN, Facts & figures of the chemical industry: Chem Eng News, 2009; 87; 29-63
4. Ohno H, Kawamura Y, Analysis of acrylonitrile, 1,3-butadiene, and related compounds in acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymers for kitchen utensils and children’s toys by headspace gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: J AOAC Int, 2010; 93; 1965-71, pmid: 21313827
5. Kessler L: Transplant Proc, 1992; 24; 953-54, pmid: 1604681
6. Ward RA, Biocompatibility of a new high-permeability modified cellulose membrane for haemodialysis: Nephrol Dial Transplant, 1993; 8(1); 47-53, pmid: 8381935
7. Rubio R, Galceran MT, Rauret G, Nitrites and isonitriles as interferents in cyanide determination in polluted water: Analyst, 1990; 115(7); 959-63, pmid: 2221403
8. Conacher HB, Page BD, Ryan JJ, Industrial chemical contamination of foods: Food Addit Contam, 1993; 10(1); 129-43, pmid: 8504868
9. Kondakova LV, Fomina EI, Alekseeva OV, Composition of volatile thermo-destruction components of automobile brake straps: Gig Tr Prof Zabol, 1990(3); 18-21, pmid: 1693582
10. Laugesen M, Fowles J, Scope for regulation of cigarette smoke toxicity according to brand differences in toxicant emissions: N Z Med J, 2005; 118; U1402, pmid: 15843831
11. TRI: TRI Explorer Chemical Report, 2009, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and select Acrylonitrile. Last updated 2/09http://www.epa.gov/triexplorer
12. Duverger-Van Bogaert M: Toxicol Lett, 1981; 7(4–5); 311-19, pmid: 7222107
13. Ghanayem BI, Acrylonitrile is a multisite carcinogen in male and female B6C3F1 mice: Toxicol Sci, 2002; 68; 59-68, pmid: 12075111
14. Hamada FM, Possible functional immunotoxicity of acrylonitrile (VCN): Pharmacol Res, 1998; 37(2); 123-29, pmid: 9572067
15. Saillenfait AM: Arch Toxicol, 1993; 67(3); 164-72, pmid: 8494495
16. Schaffer CB
17. Swaen GM, Mortality update of workers exposed to acrylonitrile in The Netherlands: J Occup Environ Med, 2004; 46; 691-98, pmid: 15247808
18. Karami S, Renal cancer risk and occupational exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and plastics: J Occup Environ Med, 2011; 53; 218-23, pmid: 21270648
19. Ghanayem BI, Boor PJ, Ahmed AE, Acrylonitrile-induced gastric mucosal necrosis: role of gastric glutathione: J Pharmacol Exp Ther, 1985; 232(2); 570-77, pmid: 3968646
20. Léonard A, Mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and teratogenicity of acrylonitrile: Mutat Res, 1999; 436; 263-83, pmid: 10354525
21. Wang H, Chanas B, Ghanayem BI, Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP 2E1) is essential for acrylonitrile metabolism to cyanide: comparative studies using CYP2E1-null and wild-type mice: Drug Metab Dispos, 2002; 30; 911-17, pmid: 12124309
22. Park BK, Pirmohamed M, Kitteringham NR, The role of cytochrome P450 enzymes in hepatic and extrahepatic human drug toxicity: Pharmacol Ther, 1995; 68; 385-424, pmid: 8788564
23. Mohamadin AM, Possible role of hydroxyl radicals in the oxidation of dichloroacetonitrile by Fenton-like reaction: J Inorg Biochem, 2001; 84(1–2); 97-105, pmid: 11330486
24. Abdel-Naim AB, Mohamadin AM, Myeloperoxidase-catalyzed oxidation of chloroacetonitrile to cyanide: Toxicol Lett, 2004; 146; 249-57, pmid: 14687762
25. Nasralla SN: Toxicol Lett, 2009; 191; 347-52, pmid: 19825401
26. Mohamadin AM, Abdel-Naim AB: Arch Toxicol, 2003; 77(2); 86-93, pmid: 12590360
27. Moriwaki Y, Immunohistochemical localization of aldehyde and xanthine oxidase in rat tissues using polyclonal antibodies: Histochem Cell Biol, 1996; 105(1); 71-79, pmid: 8824908
28. Grisham MB, Granger DN, Neutrophil-mediated mucosal injury. Role of reactive oxygen metabolites: Dig Dis Sci, 1988; 33(3 Suppl); 6S-15S, pmid: 2831016
29. Parks DA, Granger DN, Xanthine oxidase: biochemistry, distribution and physiology: Acta Physiol Scand Suppl, 1986; 548; 87-99, pmid: 3529824
30. Wakabayashi Y, Conversion of xanthine dehydrogenase to xanthine oxidase in bovine carotid artery endothelial cells induced by activated neutrophils: involvement of adhesion molecules: Biochim Biophys Acta, 1995; 1265(2–3); 103-9, pmid: 7696338
31. McCord JM, Oxygen-derived free radicals in postischemic tissue injury: New Engl J Med, 1985; 312; 159-63, pmid: 2981404
32. Hakgüder G, Short-term intestinal ischemia-reperfusion alters intestinal motility that can be preserved by xanthine oxidase inhibition: Dig Dis Sci, 2002; 47; 1279-83, pmid: 12064802
33. Terada LS, Hypoxia injures endothelial cells by increasing endogenous xanthine oxidase activity: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1992; 89; 3362-66, pmid: 1314387
34. Hamada FMA, A new therapeutic use of allopurinol: the drug protects the gastric mucosa from the ulcerogenic effect of alcohol: Arab J Lab Med, 1992; 18(2); 283-92
35. Woutersen RA, Toxicologic profile of acrylonitrile: Scand J Work Environ Health, 1998; 24(Suppl 2); 5-9, pmid: 9714508
36. Shaw S, Jayatilleke E, The role of aldehyde oxidase in ethanol-induced hepatic lipid peroxidation in the rat: Biochem J, 1990; 268(3); 579-83, pmid: 2363695
37. Cighetti G, Debiasi S, Paroni R, Effect of glutathione depletion on the conversion of xanthine dehydrogenase to oxidase in rat liver: Biochem Pharmacol, 1993; 45(11); 2359-61, pmid: 8517879
38. Waud WR, Rajagopalan KV, Purification and properties of the NAD+-dependent (type D) and O2-dependent (type O) forms of rat liver xanthine dehydrogenase: Arch Biochem Biophys, 1976; 172(2); 354-64, pmid: 176939
39. Johnston RBJ, Measurement of Or secreted by monocytes and macrophages: Methods Enzymol, 1984; 105; 365-69, pmid: 6328188
40. Sedlak J, Lindsay RH, Estimation of total, protein-bound, and nonprotein sulfhydryl groups in tissue with Ellman’s reagent: Anal Biochem, 1968; 25(1); 192-205, pmid: 4973948
41. Uchiyama M, Mihara M, Determination of malondialdehyde precursor in tissues by thiobarbituric acid test: Anal Biochem, 1978; 86; 271-78, pmid: 655387
42. Lowry OH, Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent: J Biol Chem, 1951; 193(1); 265-75, pmid: 14907713
43. Smith SM, Gastric mucosal injury in the rat. Role of iron and xanthine oxidase: Gastroenterology, 1987; 92(4); 950-56, pmid: 3557001
44. Hasan NM, Cundall RB, Adams GE, Effects of hypoxia and reoxygenation on the conversion of xanthine dehydrogenase to oxidase in Chinese hamster V79 cells: Free Radic Biol Med, 1991; 11(2); 179-85, pmid: 1937136
45. Miester A, Anderson ME, Glutathione: Annu Rev Biochem, 1983; 52; 711-60, pmid: 6137189
46. Fennell TR, Kedderis GL, Sumner SC, Urinary metabolites of [1,2,3-13C]acrylonitrile in rats and mice detected by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Chem Res Toxicol, 1991; 4(6); 678-87, pmid: 1807451
47. Ahmed AE, Distribution and covalent interactions of [1–14C]acrylonitrile in the rat: Toxicology, 1982; 23(2–3); 159-75, pmid: 7112591
48. Pilon D, Roberts AE, Rickert DE, Effect of glutathione depletion on the irreversible association of acrylonitrile with tissue macromolecules after oral administration to rats: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 1988; 95(2); 311-20, pmid: 3420618
49. McCord JM, Fridovich I, The reduction of cytochrome c by milk xanthine oxidase: J Biol Chem, 1968; 243(21); 5753-60, pmid: 4972775
50. Winterbourn CC, Sutton HC, Iron and xanthine oxidase catalyze formation of an oxidant species distinguishable from OH.: comparison with the Haber-Weiss reaction: Arch Biochem Biophys, 1986; 244(1); 27-34, pmid: 3004338
51. Nilsson UA: Free Radic Biol Med, 1989; 6(3); 251-59, pmid: 2545549
52. Guangwei X, Curcumin pretreatment protects against acute acrylonitrile-induced oxidative damage in rats: Toxicology, 2010; 267(1–3); 140-46, pmid: 19913070
53. Granger DN, Xanthine oxidase inhibitors attenuate ischemia-induced vascular permeability changes in the cat intestine: Gastroenterology, 1986; 90(1); 80-84, pmid: 3753555
54. Mohamadin AM, Abdel-Naim AB: Arch Toxicol, 2003; 77; 86-93, pmid: 12590360
55. Reed CJ, Douglas KT, Chemical cleavage of plasmid DNA by glutathione in the presence of Cu(II) ions. The Cu(II)-thiol system for DNA strand scission: Biochem J, 1991; 275; 601-8, pmid: 2039439
56. Fujimoto S, Kawakami N, Ohara A, Hydroxylation of phenylalanine and salicylate by stimulated polymorphonuclear leukocytes and the accelerating effect of glutathione on their hydroxylation: Biol Pharm Bull, 1997; 17; 767-72, pmid: 7951135
57. Wefers H, Sies H, Oxidation of glutathione by the superoxide radical to the disulfide and the sulfonate yielding singlet oxygen: Eur J Biochem, 1983; 137; 29-36, pmid: 6317388
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






