Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

01 September 2012: Clinical Research  

Respiratory pressures and expiratory peak flow rate of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery

Camila Gimenes ABDEF , Irma Godoy ADE , Carlos Roberto Padovani C , Rodrigo Gimenes B , Marina Politi Okoshi DEF , Katashi Okoshi ACDEF

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.883351

Med Sci Monit 2012; 18(9): CR558-563

0 Comments

Background

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of death in the Western world. The treatment of CAD depends on the clinical picture, the results of provocative ischemia tests, the coronary lesions (degree, location and anatomy), the left ventricular function, and associated co-morbidities. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) has been extensively used for CAD treatment, and is associated with a decrease of morbidity and mortality [1–4].

Because it is a major surgery involving the thoracic cavity, lung function is compromised in the postoperative period. Lung complications have been described as the main cause of heart surgery postoperative morbidity and mortality [5]. In patients with severe cardiac diseases, physical activity is often reduced, leading to decreased lung volumes and capacities, which are exacerbated by heart surgery [6,7].

In heart surgery, during the postoperative period, pulmonary complications are related to preoperative risk factors such as aging, smoking, poor nutritional status, associated co-morbidities, and previous lung diseases and altered lung function. These factors can impair respiratory mechanics and gas exchange [5,8,9]. Intra-operative factors such as type of anesthesia, sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass, and mechanical ventilation can also interfere with lung function by inducing a superficial breathing pattern at the expense of reduced lung volumes [10–13]. According to Elias et al. [6], postoperative pulmonary complications are related to reduced maximal respiratory pressures and expiratory peak flow rate (EPFR), as their values are lower than preoperative values at hospital discharge [14].

The ability of the respiratory system to eliminate secretion is related to the EPFR; very low values are associated with inability to cough and eliminate secretion with an inadequate cleaning of the tracheobronchial tree. Appropriate protection of the respiratory tract also depends on respiratory muscle strength [15,16].

Despite knowledge of the causes and mechanisms of lung function reduction after CABG surgery, the effect of preoperative clinical status on postoperative respiratory pressures and EPFR has not been clearly defined. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate clinical and laboratory parameters that predict decreased respiratory function by CABG. We specifically assessed the influence of clinical and laboratorial variables on pre- and postoperative values of maximal respiratory pressures and EPFR of patients subjected to CABG surgery.

Material and Methods

DATA ANALYSIS:

The general characteristics of patients are presented using descriptive statistics. Comparisons were performed using paired Student’s t test and 2-way ANOVA. The association between variables was assessed by Pearson’s correlation. Multiple logistic regression was performed to analyze the effect of preoperative factors on the respiratory parameters [31]. Statistical significance was accepted at the level of P<0.05.

Results

Sixty-one patients, 67.2% males and median age of 62.8±9.6 year-old were included in this study. There was no significant age difference between sexes (p=0.41). Arterial hypertension was found in 75.4% of the patients, diabetes in 31.2%, dyslipidemia in 63.9%, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in 16.4%. Fifteen patients (24.6%) were smokers, with 43±24 pack-years history, and 21 patients (34.4%) were ex-smokers, with an average smoking history of 36±29 pack-years. Forty-one (67.2%) had experienced a previous myocardial infarction and 11 (18.0%) had been subjected to coronary angioplasty. Heart failure functional class I was found in 4.92% of the patients, class II in 62.3%, and class III in 32.8%. Angina class I was observed in 8.20% of the patients, class II in 59.0%, and class III in 32.8%. Coronary angiography showed stenosis in 3 vessels in 63.9%, 2 vessels in 27.9% and 1 vessel in 8.2% of patients. Preoperative hemoglobin concentration was 12.8±1.71 g/dL.

Six patients (9.84%) received 2 bypass grafts, 23 (37.7%) received 3, 28 (45.9%) received 4, and 4 (6.56%) received 5 grafts. Five patients were concomitantly subjected to aortic valve replacement, 1 to ventricular aneurysmectomy, and 1 to atrial septal defect correction. All patients were subjected to cardiopulmonary bypass. The average time of cardiopulmonary bypass and mechanical ventilation were 102±25.7 minutes and 15.4±4.19 hours, respectively.

In the preoperative period, low values of MIP, MEP, and EPFR were found in 80.3%, 65.7%, and 88.5% of patients, respectively (Table 1). Maximal respiratory pressures and EPFR values were lower in females than in males (p<0.05). EPFR positively correlated with MIP and MEP values. Using the Neder et al. [27] equations for MIP and MEP normal values and the Knudson et al. [29] table for EPFR normal values, we classified our patients as presenting normal or decreased values for respiratory parameters. This classification was used in multiple logistic regression analysis. We observed that the higher the hemoglobin level, the greater the chance of presenting normal MEP values in the preoperative period (each increase of 1 hemoglobin unit increases this chance by 1.84 times; Table 2). We did not observe any influence from clinical parameters on preoperative MIP, MEP, and EPFR values.

In the preoperative period, we observed a negative correlation between age and both MEP (p<0.05; r=−0.26) and EPFR (p<0.05, r=−0.27), and a positive correlation between hemoglobin levels and the respiratory parameters MIP, MEP (Figure 1), and EPFR.

In the 5th postoperative day, respiratory parameters were significantly reduced: MIP, MEP, and EPFR decreased by 26.9%, 22.7%, and 28.2%, respectively, compared to the preoperative values (Table 1). We found a positive correlation between MIP variation and both MEP and EPFR variation. We did not observe a correlation between cardiopulmonary bypass duration and the percentage of reduction in respiratory parameters.

The influence of angina severity and COPD on pulmonary changes between the preoperative period and the 5th postoperative day was assessed using 2-way ANOVA (Table 3). In patients with angina class II, the presence of COPD did not interfere on variations in MIP, MEP, and EPFR between pre- and postoperative periods. However, in patients with angina class III, the occurrence of COPD was associated with higher variations in MIP and MEP between these periods. When COPD was absent, angina severity did not influence the degree of pulmonary changes, while in COPD patients the presence of class III angina resulted in higher variation of MIP between pre- and postoperative periods.

Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the clinical parameters, sex, age, smoking, heart failure, previous myocardial infarction or angioplasty, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia were not associated with a reduction in postoperative respiratory parameters.

Discussion

In this study we evaluated the influence of preoperative clinical and laboratorial parameters on the pre- and postoperative values of maximal respiratory pressures and EPFR in patients subjected to CABG surgery.

Heart disease patients frequently present respiratory alterations in consequence of left ventricular dysfunction. Respiratory changes can be caused by lung congestion and/or blood flow reduction to respiratory muscles, which leads to a decrease of maximal respiratory pressures [6]. Respiratory muscle dysfunction in the preoperative period has been associated with a high incidence of pulmonary complications in the postoperative period [32]. Therefore, as respiratory muscle dysfunction can be considered a morbidity and mortality risk factor in major surgeries involving the thoracic cavity, detecting this condition is helpful to risk stratification of patients undergoing heart surgery [33]. In our study, the MIP and MEP values in the preoperative period were lower than normal in 80.3% and 65.7% of patients, respectively. In accordance with the literature, maximal respiratory pressure findings of this study were lower in women than in men, and in aged patients [19,34].

We also evaluated EPFR, which is a respiratory muscle strength-dependent measure. Low EPFR has been associated with inability to cough and eliminate secretions, and consequently inadequate cleaning of the tracheobronchial tree [15,16]. In the preoperative period, 88.5% of our patients presented EPFR lower than the normal expected values, which is in accordance with the findings of other authors [14]. EPFR was positively correlated with MIP and MEP and negatively correlated with age.

Hemoglobin levels are related with physical capacity and muscle fatigue [35–37]. Reduction of hemoglobin level decreases the oxygen transport to skeletal muscles and may impair muscle force development [38]. We found a positive association between hemoglobin concentration and maximal respiratory pressures and EPFR values in the preoperative period, and observed that the increase of 1 hemoglobin unit increases the odds ratio in 1.84 to have normal MEP values. The mechanisms involved in pulmonary mechanics impairment related to anemia are not clear. Recently, Fernandes et al. [39] observed that in lung thoracic surgery, postoperative respiratory and infectious complications were related to the presence of anemia. This finding and our results reinforce the need to investigate and treat anemia before surgery if the procedure is not urgent.

We re-evaluated respiratory pressures on the 5th postoperative day, when patients had at least partially recovered from surgical pain and were close to discharge. Several authors have assessed postoperative pulmonary mechanics following cardiac surgery between the 4th and 6th postoperative day [40–42]. In this study, respiratory pressures were lower than the preoperative values. Lung volume reduction in the postoperative period is caused by several factors, such as diaphragm dysfunction, chest pain, and lung and thoracic alterations [43,44]. Furthermore, any surgical procedure under general anesthesia is followed by some degree of respiratory dysfunction, even when the lungs are not directly involved [44].

Angina pectoris can cause muscle weakness, including the respiratory muscles, due to reduction of physical activity leading to muscle inactivity. Studies have shown that physical exercise programs and inspiratory muscle training improve physical capacity, diaphragm function, muscle strength, and dyspnea in patients with CAD [45]. COPD can also influence pulmonary mechanical function in both pre- and postoperative conditions. In this study, we evaluated the influence of both angina severity and COPD on pulmonary changes. We observed that severe angina (class III), in association with COPD, results in higher reductions in pulmonary pressures between the preoperative period and the 5th postoperative day. Analysis of multiple logistic regression failed to show a COPD effect on preoperative respiratory pressures and EPFR, probably due to the small number of COPD patients in our study.

EPFR values on the 5th postoperative day were significantly reduced compared to the preoperative period. A similar finding was reported by Giacomkazzi et al. [14] in patients subjected to heart surgery. Pain is an important factor responsible for reduction of respiratory muscle strength in the postoperative period. Muller et al. [46] showed that 51% of heart surgery patients still had sternotomy pain on the 7th postoperative day. In the postoperative period, routine procedures such as movement in bed and mediastinal drain manipulation can influence respiration mechanics and cough ability [47,48]. Another factor that contributes to impaired lung function and respiratory mechanics is the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) itself. Guizillini et al. [7] demonstrated that more severe lung dysfunction with reduction of volumes and lung capacities occur in surgeries with CPB. In our study we did not observe association between CPB duration and reduction of maximal respiratory pressures and EPFR. Although mechanical ventilation can induce deleterious effects on pulmonary function [49], we did not find an association between duration of mechanical ventilation and reduction of maximal respiratory pressures and EPFR postoperative values.

Postoperative pulmonary complications can also be associated with preoperative risk factors such as advanced age, previous lung diseases, smoking, poor nutritional status, impaired lung function and co-morbidities [5,50]. In our study, patient characteristics such as sex, age, smoking, heart failure, previous myocardial infarction or angioplasty, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia were not associated with reduction of postoperative respiratory parameters.

Physical therapy has been shown to be important for heart surgeries results. In this study, patients showed (even on 5th postoperative day) values of maximal respiratory pressures and EPFR lower than those obtained in the preoperative period. Furthermore, postoperative complications can be significantly reduced if lung dysfunction is recognized and appropriately managed in the preoperative period. Careful preoperative preparation including respiratory exercises in patients with chronic lung disease reduces postoperative complications significantly [51]. In our study, patients with associated severe angina and COPD presented higher postoperative reductions in maximal respiratory pressures than the others. These patients should receive more attention in the preoperative period with the indication of physical therapy. Implementation of physical therapy protocols in the pre- and postoperative periods is considered essential to prevent and treat pulmonary complications.

Conclusions

In conclusion, older age and low hemoglobin levels are associated with preoperative low maximal respiratory pressures and expiratory peak flow rate. The combination of severe angina and COPD results in higher postoperative reduction of maximal respiratory pressures in CABG patients.

References

1. Eagle KA, Guyton RA, Davidoff R, ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: Circulation, 2004; 110; e340-437, pmid: 15466654

2. Brykczyński M, Żych A, Gorący II, Evaluation of the level of antibodies against Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) pneumoniae in post-surgery heart ischaemia patients and their clinical conditions – a six-year study: Arch Med Sci, 2010; 6(2); 214-20, pmid: 22371750

3. Chilappa K, Aronow WS, Rajdev A, Mortality at long-term follow-up of patients with no, nonobstructive, and revascularized 1-, 2-, and 3-vessel obstructive coronary artery disease: Med Sci Monit, 2010; 16(5); RA120-23, pmid: 20424563

4. Mansencal N, Pillière R, Gueta RN, Characteristics and prognosis of coronary revascularization procedure in patients age 80 and older presenting with acute myocardial infarction: Med Sci Monit, 2010; 16(1); CR15-20, pmid: 20037489

5. Pereira EDB, Fernandes ALG, Anção MDS, Prospective assessment of the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients submitted to upper abdominal surgery: Sao Paulo Med J, 1999; 117; 151-60, pmid: 10559850

6. Elias DG, Costa D, Oishi J, Effects of respiratory muscle training before and after cardiac surgery: Rev Bras Terap Intens, 2000; 12; 9-18

7. Guizilini S, Gomes WJ, Faresin SM, Avaliação da função pulmonar em pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de revascularização do miocárdio com e sem circulação extracorpórea: Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc, 2005; 20; 310-16 [in Portuguese]

8. Doyle RL, Assessing and modifying the risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: Chest, 1999; 115; 77S-81S, pmid: 10331338

9. Saad IAB, Zambom L, Clinical variables of preoperative risk: Rev Assoc Med Bras, 2001; 47; 117-24, pmid: 11468678

10. Fernandes CR, Ruiz Neto PP, The respiratory system and the elderly: anesthetic implications: Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2002; 52; 461-70, pmid: 19479112

11. Ford GT, Rosenal TW, Clergue F, Whitelaw W, Respiratory physiology in upper abdominal surgery: Clin Chest Med, 1993; 14; 237-52, pmid: 8519170

12. Çimen S, Özkul V, Ketenci B, Daily comparison of respiratory functions between on-pump and off-pump patients undergoing CABG: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2003; 23; 589-94, pmid: 12694781

13. Barbosa RAG, Carmona MJC, Evaluation of pulmonary function in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2002; 52; 689-99, pmid: 19475240

14. Giacomkazzi CM, Lagni VB, Monteiro MB, Postoperative pain as a contributor to pulmonary function impairment in patients submitted to heart surgery: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg, 2006; 21; 386-92

15. King M, Brock G, Lundell C, Clearence of mucus by simulated cough: J Appl Physiol, 1985; 58; 1776-82, pmid: 4008399

16. Bach JR, Saporito LR, Criteria for extubation and tracheostomy tube removal for patients with ventilatory failure. A different approach to weaning: Chest, 1996; 110; 1566-71, pmid: 8989078

17. Mann DL, Management of heart failure pacients with reduced ejection fraction: Heart Disease. A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 2008; 611-40, Philadelphia, Elsevier Saunders

18. Dagenais GR, Armstrong PW, Theroux P, Naylor CD, Revisiting the Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading of stable angina pectoris after a quarter of a century of use: Can J Cardiol, 2002; 18; 941-44, pmid: 12368927

19. Enright PL, Kronmal RA, Manolio TACardiovascular Health Study Research Group, Respiratory muscle strength in the elderly. Correlates and reference values: Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1994; 149; 430-38, pmid: 8306041

20. Enright PL, Adams AB, Boyle PJ, Sherrill DL, Spirometry and maximal respiratory pressure references from healthy Minnesota 65- to 85-year-old women and men: Chest, 1995; 108; 663-69, pmid: 7656613

21. Harik-Khan RI, Wise RA, Fozard JL, Determinants of maximal inspiratory pressure. The Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging: Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1998; 158; 1459-64, pmid: 9817693

22. Carpenter MA, Tockman MS, Hutchinson RG, Demographic and anthropometric correlates of maximum inspiratory pressure: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study: Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1999; 159; 415-22, pmid: 9927352

23. Koulouris N, Mulvey DA, Laroche CM, Comparison of two different mouthpieces for the measurement of Pimax and Pemax in normal and weak subjects: Eur Respir J, 1988; 1; 863-67, pmid: 3229485

24. Rubinstein I, Slutsky AS, Rebuck AS, Assessment of maximal expiratory pressure in healthy adults: J Appl Physiol, 1988; 64; 2215-19, pmid: 3391920

25. Bruschi C, Cerveri I, Zoia MC, Reference values of maximal respiratory mouth pressures: a population-based study: Am Rev Respir Dis, 1992; 146; 790-93, pmid: 1519865

26. Fiz JA, Carreres A, Rosell A, Measurement of maximal expiratory pressure: effect of holding the lips: Thorax, 1992; 47; 961-63, pmid: 1465756

27. Neder JA, Andreoni S, Lerario MC, Nery LE, Reference values for lung function tests. II. Maximal respiratory pressures and voluntary ventilation: Braz J Med Biol Res, 1999; 32; 719-27, pmid: 10412550

28. Ayres JG, Turpin PJ, Peak flow measurement: An illustrated guide, 1997, London, UK, Chapman & Hall Medical

29. Knudson RJ, Slatin RC, Lebowitz MD, Burrows B, The maximal expiratory flow-volume curve. Normal standards, variability and effects of age: Am Rev Respir Dis, 1976; 113; 587-600, pmid: 1267262

30. Regan K, Kleinfeld ME, Erik PC, Fisioterapia para pacientes com cirurgia abdominal ou torácica: Fisioterapia Cardiopulmonar, 1994; 315-41, São Paulo, Manole

31. Hosmer W, Lemeshow S: Applied logistic regression, 1989, New York, John Wiley

32. Bellinetti LM, Thomson JC, Respiratory muscle evalution in elective thoracotomies and laparotomies of the upper abdomen: J Bras Pneumol, 2006; 32; 99-105, pmid: 17273578

33. Shiafakas NM, Mitrouska I, Bouros D, Georgopoulosb D, Surgery and the respiratory muscles: Thorax, 1999; 54; 458-65, pmid: 10212115

34. Black LF, Hyatt RE, Maximal respiratory pressures: normal values and relationship to age and sex: Am Rev Respir Dis, 1969; 99; 697-771

35. Lipschitz D, Medical and functional consequences of anemia in the elderly: J Am Geriatr Soc, 2003; 51; S10-13, pmid: 12588566

36. Williams C, Hemoglobin – is more better?: Nephrol Dial Transplant, 1995; 10; 48-55, pmid: 7644106

37. Penninx BWJH, Pahor M, Cesari M, Anemia is associated with disability and decreased physical performance and muscle strength in the elderly: J Am Geriatr Soc, 2004; 52; 719-24, pmid: 15086651

38. Cerretelli P, Muscle energetics and ultrastructure in chronic hypoxia: Respiration, 1992; 59; 24-29, pmid: 1513969

39. Fernandes EO, Teixeira C, Silva LCC, Thoracic surgery: risk factors for postoperative complications of lung resection: Rev Assoc Med Bras, 2011; 57; 292-98, pmid: 21691692

40. Westerdahl E, Lindmark B, Eriksson T, Deep-Breathing exercises reduce atelectasis and improve pulmonary function after coronary artery bypass surgery: Chest, 2005; 5; 3482-88, pmid: 16304303

41. Taggart DP, El-Fiky M, Carter R, Respiratory Dysfunction After Uncomplicated Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Ann Thorac Surg, 1993; 56; 1123-28, pmid: 8239811

42. Borghi-Silva A, Mendes RG, Costa SMF, The influences of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) associated with physiotherapy intervention in phase I Cardiac Rehabilitation: Clinics, 2005; 60; 465-72, pmid: 16358136

43. Locke TJ, Griffiths TL, Mould H, Gibson GJ, Rib cage mechanics after median sternotomy: Thorax, 1990; 45; 465-68, pmid: 2392792

44. Weiner P, Zeidan F, Zamir D, Prophylactic inspiratory muscle training in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft: World J Surg, 1998; 22; 427-31, pmid: 9564282

45. Darnley GM, Gray AC, McClure SJ, Effects of resistive breathing on exercise capacity and diaphragm function in patients with ischaemic heart disease: Eur J Heart Fail, 1999; 1; 297-300, pmid: 10935679

46. Mueller XM, Tinguely F, Tevaearai HT, Pain location, distribution, and intensity after cardiac surgery: Chest, 2000; 118; 391-96, pmid: 10936130

47. Magnano D, Montalbano R, Lamarra M, Ineffectiveness of local wound anesthesia to reduce postoperative pain after median sternotomy: J Card Surg, 2005; 20; 314-18, pmid: 15985128

48. Mueller XM, Tinguely F, Tevaearai HT, Impact of duration of chest tube drainage on pain after cardiac surgery: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2000; 18; 570-74, pmid: 11053819

49. Auler JO, Carmona MJ, Barbas CV, The effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on respiratory system mechanics and hemodynamics in postoperative cardiac surgery patients: Braz J Med Biol Res, 2000; 33; 31-42, pmid: 10625872

50. Ambrozin ARP, Cataneo AJM, Pulmonary function aspects after myocardial revascularization related to preoperative risk: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg, 2005; 20; 408-15

51. Leguisamo CP, Kalil RAK, Furlani AP, Effectiveness of a preoperative physiotherapeutic approach in myocardial revascularization: Braz J Cardiovasc Surg, 2005; 20; 134-41

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750