Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

01 October 2012: Case Study  

Chondrosarcoma from the sternum: Reconstruction with titanium mesh and a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap after subtotal sternal excision

Kazutaka Koto BCDEF , Tomoya Sakabe ABDF , Naoyuki Horie B , Kazuteru Ryu B , Hiroaki Murata AC , Shinichiro Nakamura AB , Toshihiro Ishida B , Eiichi Konishi B , Toshikazu Kubo G

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.883471

Med Sci Monit 2012; 18(10): CS77-81

0 Comments

Background

Primary tumors of the sternum are very rare, accounting for <1% of primary bone tumors [1]. In particular, chondrosarcoma arising from the sternum is extremely rare, observed in only 86 of 49,768 (0.17%) of patients diagnosed with bone tumors in Japan from 1972–2003. Removal of the sternum for a malignant tumor results in a large defects in bone and soft tissue, causing deformity and paradoxical movement of the chest wall. The chest wall may be reconstructed, using methods such as musculocutaneous flaps and alloplastic materials. Although these techniques have enabled wide resection and relieved troublesome complaints, such as a frail chest, each has advantages and disadvantages. We describe here a patient with a chondrosarcoma arising from the sternum, who underwent resection of the sternum and chest wall, followed by thoracic reconstruction with the combination of a titanium mesh and a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap.

Case Report

A 63-year-old man was referred to our hospital with progressively enlarging swelling of his anterior chest wall. He had no significant past medical or surgical history. A physical examination showed a 2.5×2.0 cm mass fixed to the sternum. No pulsation was noted. All laboratory tests at admission, including for tumor markers, were within normal limits. A roentgenogram of the sternum showed no apparent shadow of the tumor. Computed tomography showed a tumor shadow on the cancellous bone, which expanded across the destroyed cortex to the parietal and visceral soft parts. The lesion involved some parts of the costal cartilage and most of the sternum body (Figure 1). MR imaging showed a relatively well-defined and heterogeneous mass, primarily in the body of the sternum, but expanded into the soft tissues. The mass was isointense to the adjacent skeletal muscles on T1-weighted images and highly intense with slight heterogeneity on T2-weighted images (Figure 2A, B). On Gd-DTPA images, some parts of the mass were well-defined and contrasted (Figure 2B). A bone scintigram showed a slightly abnormal accumulation, whereas positron emission tomography showed no evidence of abnormal accumulation.

Based on clinical findings and imaging characteristics, the tumor was diagnosed as being either a primary bone tumor arising from the body of the sternum or a metastatic bone tumor. An incisional biopsy was therefore performed. Microscopically, the tumor was composed of sheets of cartilaginous cells, with a lobulated growth pattern. We also observe cells permeating between preexisting bony trabeculae. The tumor cells varied in size and shape, and contained a greater degree of nuclear atypia, hyperchromasia and nuclear size. Myxoid changes in the matrix were also seen. We therefore diagnosed this tumor as a grade II chondrosarcoma (Figure 3A, B). To remove the tumor and obtain wide surgical margins, we performed a subtotal sternal excision, resecting four-fifths of the sternum body and the right third, fourth and fifth ribs with involved soft tissues at a position 2 cm lateral to the right sternal edge. This excision resulted in a huge defect (14.0×8.0 cm) in the anterior chest wall. Macroscopically, the tumor had expanded across the destroyed cortex to the visceral soft parts (Figure 4).

To reconstruct the thorax, titanium mesh was placed over the defect and fixed with screws to the bony rib (Figure 5). A musculocutaneous flap was harvested from the rectus abdominis muscle to close the resultant soft tissue defect. Immediately after surgery, the patient had good respiratory condition and immediate chest wall stability. In addition, the TRAM flap was taken up successfully. Although some fixed screws had dropped off, paradoxical movement of the chest wall was not observed. At the present time, 64 months after the surgery, the patient is physically active with a stable chest wall, and computed tomography has shown no evidence of local recurrence or distant metastasis.

Discussion

A chondrosarcoma is a malignant tumor with pure hyaline cartilage differentiation that may be accompanied by myxoid changes, calcification or ossification. Primary chondrosarcoma is the second most common primary malignancy of bone after osteosarcoma, accounting for approximately 20% of malignant bone tumors in one large series [2]. The most common skeletal sites of chondrosarcoma are the bones of the pelvis, especially the ilium, followed by the proximal humerus, the distal femur and the ribs. Most patients are older than 50 years, and there is a slight male preponderance [3].

Primary malignant tumors of the sternum are very rare, accounting for only nine of 2004 (0.45%) primary bone tumors in the Leeds Bone Tumor Registry [4]. Although chondrosarcoma is the most common malignant bone tumor of the sternum [5–9], its frequency was less than 0.2% [2].

Current therapy for chondrosarcoma requires adequate surgical excision; radiation therapy and chemotherapy have not been shown effective [10–20]. The goal of surgery is to resect the tumor with a wide margin of normal tissue, ensuring that all tumor cells have been excised and resulting in local disease control. Inadequately tumor resection is associated with a high incidence of recurrence (69% compared with 6% in adequately treated patients) [15]. The exact surgical procedure depends on the location of the tumor, the extent of the disease, and the grade of the lesion.

Sternal tumors are difficult to treat because of the anatomic proximity of vital neurovascular structures and the limited surgical margins that can be achieved. The adequacy of surgical resection is of paramount importance in determining clinical outcome [18,21]. Although it has been recommended that the incision be placed 2 to 6 cm from the margin of the tumor to minimize the risk of local recurrence [6,22–24], this requirement is not always fulfilled. Total sternectomy also has drawbacks, including chest wall instability, exposure of thoracic organs and possible paradoxical respiration.

Reconstruction after resection is necessary to prevent respiratory deficits and to protect mediastinal structures. Various reconstruction techniques using prosthetic or homologous material have been described, including synthetic and metallic grafts, pedicled skin and muscle flaps, free skin grafts, fascia lata and autologous bone transplants, with the choice of reconstruction technique dependent on the size and site of the defect, minimizing any deleterious effects. Skeletal reconstruction is not necessary for defects less than 5 cm in diameter [25]. If only the upper sternum is resected (i.e. the manubrium with ribs 1 to 3), muscle flaps alone may be sufficient for reconstruction. In contrast, resection of the lower sternum frequently requires rigid structures to protect the heart and stabilize the bony thorax [24].

The ideal characteristics of a prosthetic material include rigidity, reducing paradoxical chest motion; inertness, to allow in-growth of fibrous tissue and decrease the likelihood of infection; malleability, to enable the material to be fashioned to the appropriate size and shape at the time of surgery; and radiolucency to allow radiographic follow-up of the underlying problem [26]. Polypropylene mesh (Marlex mesh,R) is used most frequently for the reconstruction of chest wall defects. Although this mesh is relatively easy to handle and has a high affinity for tissues [27], its lack of rigidity in patients with large defects may result in paradoxical chest wall motion [28]. In contrast, methyl methacrylate and titanium plates are highly rigid but insufficiently malleable. Titanium mesh may be complicated by infection or fragmentation of the graft, but it is more rigid and osteoconductive than polypropylene mesh, easy to handle and mold to the shape of the defect, appropriately elastic, less visible on MR imaging than stainless steel, and assimilates well with surrounding soft tissues [29]. Since the protection of visceral organs after wide resection was the most important consideration in our patient, we used titanium mesh. We observed no change in postoperative pulmonary function, providing further evidence for the effectiveness of our procedure for large chest wall reconstruction.

Artificial materials are prone to infection and induce allergic reactions, factors not observed with autologous tissues [30]. TRAM flaps, based on the superior epigastric artery, are elegantly designed musculocutaneous flaps that have become the mainstay for breast reconstruction. Moreover, these flaps have been used in reconstruction of the chest wall, such as in patients with sternal wound infections and chest wall ulcers after irradiation [31]. One advantage of the TRAM flap is that the patient does not have to be moved throughout the procedure [32]. In addition, the graft survival rate is high because it TRAM flaps can be used as pedicle flaps in chest wall reconstruction. The size of the defect in our patient required a large volume of tissue, such as a TRAM flap, to reconstruct the chest wall. Since the tumor was located in the precordia, surgery was performed with the patient in the supine position, allowing the TRAM flap to be collected while the patient is in the same supine position.

Conclusions

We have described an extremely rare case of subtotal sternal resection and reconstruction of the sternum for a chondrosarcoma. Chest wall resection, followed by reconstruction with titanium mesh and a TRAM flap can be safely and effectively performed as a one-stage surgical procedure on patients with large chondrosarcomas arising from the sternum. The postoperative course of our patient was good, without infection, because the titanium mesh and TRAM flap provided appropriate rigidity and elasticity and covered the surgical wound fully. Our findings suggest that these procedures may be useful for reconstructing large defects in the chest wall.

References

1. Sharma RK, Mehrotra S, Dhaliwal RS, :Extended deep inferior epigastric artery flaps’ for reconstruction after excision of chondrosarcoma sternum: Br J Plast Surg, 2005; 58; 1004-6, pmid: 16039634

2. Unii KK, Inwards CY: Dahlin’s bone tumors: General Aspects and Data on 10,165 Cases, 2010, Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven

3. Christopher DM, Fletcher K, Unni K, Mertens F, Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone: World Health Organization classification of tumours, 2002; 247-51, Lyon, IARC Press

4. Waller DA, Newman RJ, Primary bone tumours of the thoracic skeleton: an audit of the Leeds regional bone tumour registry: Thorax, 1990; 45; 850-55, pmid: 2256013

5. Eng J, Sabanathan S, Pradhan GN, Mearns AJ, Primary bony chest wall tumours: J R Coll Surg Edinb, 1990; 35; 44-47, pmid: 2342012

6. Martini N, Huvos AG, Burt ME, Predictors of survival in malignant tumors of the sternum: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1996; 111; 96-106, pmid: 8551793

7. McAfee MK, Pairolero PC, Bergstralh EJ, Chondrosarcoma of the chest wall: factors affecting survival: Ann Thorac Surg, 1985; 40; 535-41, pmid: 2416278

8. Sabanathan S, Salama FD, Morgan WE, Harvey JA, Primary chest wall tumors: Ann Thorac Surg, 1985; 39; 4-15, pmid: 3966836

9. Sabanathan S, Shah R, Mearns AJ, Surgical treatment of primary malignant chest wall tumours: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 1997; 11; 1011-16, pmid: 9237580

10. Bjornsson J, McLeod RA, Unni KK, Primary chondrosarcoma of long bones and limb girdles: Cancer, 1998; 83; 2105-19, pmid: 9827715

11. Bruns J, Elbracht M, Niggemeyer O, Chondrosarcoma of bone: an oncological and functional follow-up study: Ann Oncol, 2001; 12; 859-64, pmid: 11484965

12. Enneking WF: Musculoskeletal tumor surgery, 1983, New York, Churchill Livingstone

13. Evans HL, Ayala AG, Romsdahl MM, Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone: a clinicopathologic analysis with emphasis on histologic grading: Cancer, 1977; 40; 818-31, pmid: 890662

14. Fiorenza F, Abudu A, Grimer RJ, Risk factors for survival and local control in chondrosarcoma of bone: J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2002; 84; 93-99, pmid: 11837841

15. Gitelis S, Bertoni F, Picci P, Campanacci M, Chondrosarcoma of bone. The experience at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1981; 63; 1248-57, pmid: 7287795

16. Lee FY, Mankin HJ, Fondren G, Chondrosarcoma of bone: an assessment of outcome: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999; 81; 326-38, pmid: 10199270

17. Lichtenstein L, Jaffe HL, Chondrosarcoma of Bone: Am J Pathol, 1943; 19; 553-89, pmid: 19970709

18. Pritchard DJ, Lunke RJ, Taylor WF, Chondrosarcoma: a clinicopathologic and statistical analysis: Cancer, 1980; 45; 149-57, pmid: 7350999

19. Rizzo M, Ghert MA, Harrelson JM, Scully SP, Chondrosarcoma of bone: analysis of 108 cases and evaluation for predictors of outcome: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001; 391; 224-33, pmid: 11603673

20. Springfield DS, Gebhardt MC, McGuire MH, Chondrosarcoma: a review: Instr Course Lect, 1996; 45; 417-24, pmid: 8727760

21. Sheth DS, Yasko AW, Johnson ME, Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. Prognostic factors for 67 patients treated with definitive surgery: Cancer, 1996; 78; 745-50, pmid: 8756367

22. Incarbone M, Nava M, Lequaglie C, Sternal resection for primary or secondary tumors: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1997; 114; 93-99, pmid: 9240298

23. King RM, Pairolero PC, Trastek VF, Primary chest wall tumors: factors affecting survival: Ann Thorac Surg, 1986; 41; 597-601, pmid: 3013106

24. Soysal O, Walsh GL, Nesbitt JC, Resection of sternal tumors: extent, reconstruction, and survival: Ann Thorac Surg, 1995; 60; 1353-59, pmid: 8526626

25. Carbognani P, Vagliasindi A, Costa P, Surgical treatment of primary and metastatic sternal tumours: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2001; 42; 411-14

26. le Roux BT, Shama DM, Resection of tumors of the chest wall: Curr Probl Surg, 1983; 20; 345-86, pmid: 6851629

27. Haraguchi S, Hioki M, Hisayoshi T, Resection of sternal tumors and reconstruction of the thorax: a review of 15 patients: Surg Today, 2006; 36; 225-29, pmid: 16493530

28. Briccoli A, Manfrini M, Rocca M, Sternal reconstruction with synthetic mesh and metallic plates for high grade tumours of the chest wall: Eur J Surg, 2002; 168; 494-99, pmid: 12549692

29. Horio H, Ohtsuka T, Kubota Y, Large chest wall reconstruction using titanium micromesh and a pedicled latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap: report of a case: Surg Today, 2005; 35; 73-75, pmid: 15622468

30. Suzuki K, Takahashi T, Itou Y, Reconstruction of diaphragm using autologous fascia lata: an experimental study in dogs: Ann Thorac Surg, 2002; 74; 209-12, pmid: 12118760

31. Yoshino N, Yamauchi S, Akimoto M, A case report on a full-thickness chest wall reconstruction with polypropylene mesh and stainless steel mesh concurrently using a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap: Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2006; 12; 445-48, pmid: 17228288

32. Nagashima A, Tashima Y, Yoshimatsu T, Osaki T, A Case of Chest Wall Reconstruction After Resection of a Desmoid Tumor: Journal of Japan Surgical Association, 2003; 64; 2705-8

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750