Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

26 November 2014: Review Articles  

Evidence for Using Alendronate to Treat Adult Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review

Ru-Bin Luo ABCDEF , Tiao Lin ABCDEF , Hui-Ming Zhong BDF , Shi-Gui Yan DE , Jian-An Wang ADEG

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.891123

Med Sci Monit 2014; 20:2439-2447

0 Comments

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Osteonecrosis or avascular osteonecrosis (AVN) of the femoral head is a devastating multifactorial disease that affects 20 000 persons each year in the United States. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy and safety of alendronate for adult AVN during short- and long-term follow-up. Electronic databases were searched for randomized or nonrandomized clinical trials, cohort, case-control studies, and series of cases in which alendronate was used for treatment of adult AVN of the femoral head. Relevant articles with adequate data on reduction of pain, improvement of articular function, slowing of bone collapse progression, or need for total hip arthroplasty (THA) were included after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight articles involving 788 hips with evidence level 1b to 3b were included in this systematic review. Most studies suggested a positive short-term efficacy of alendronate treatment in reducing pain, improving articular function, slowing of bone collapse progression, and delaying the need for THA for adult AVN patients. The favorable long-term results were also presented in those treated patients after 10-year follow-up. In addition, there were no severe adverse effects associated with alendronate treatment observed during short- and long-term follow-up, and most of the included studies suggested use of alendronate in early AVN with small necrotic lesion to achieve better outcomes. The findings support consideration of alendronate use for adult AVN, particularly with early stage and small necrotic size. The lack of large-scale, randomized, and double-blind studies justifies new studies to demonstrate the detailed indication and the optimized strategy of alendronate treatment. Level of evidence: Level 3a.

Keywords: Adolescent, Alendronate - therapeutic use, Demography, Femur Head Necrosis - drug therapy, Time Factors, young adult

Background

SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES ANALYSIS:

Agarwala et al. [18] studied 16 patients with AVN of the femoral head – most of them secondary to the use of corticosteroids. They used a regimen of alendronate 10 mg/day + calcium 1 g/day + vitamin D supplement, and the mean duration of therapy with alendronate was 24.7 weeks. Patients that used alendronate had a significant improvement in pain as early as 12 weeks, with a reduction in the need for analgesics and improvement in functional capacity in all patients, and this improvement was maintained for 24 weeks. The observation was extended to a total of 60 patients (100 hips), with an average follow-up of 37 months [17]. Alendronate was used in daily doses of 10 mg or weekly doses of 70 mg; these authors confirmed these findings and further suggested that alendronate would retard the progression of AVN and avoid the early indication of surgery in mid-term follow-up [17].

Another study with short-term follow-up was performed by Chen et al., which included 83 patients with non-traumatic AVN of the femoral head [19] – 33 of the patients were ARCO I and the rest were ARCO II. They were given oral alendronate 70 mg weekly, and evaluated with Harris criteria at baseline and 3 months after treatment. In the patients with ARCO I AVN, the scores of pain and function were improved after treatment (P<0.01). Similarly, in the patients with ARCO II AVN the scores of pain and function were both improved after treatment (p<0.01). And the score of activity was also enhanced obviously, which was not observed in ARCO I AVN patients. They concluded that alendronate is effective in treatment of early-stage adult non-traumatic AVN of the femoral head, especially for ARCO II patients.

The first RCT with short-term results evaluating the treatment of alendronate on AVN of the femoral head was by Lai et al. [16]. They studied 40 patients with Steinberg Stage II or III C non-traumatic AVN of the femoral head. The patients were divided into 2 groups, half of them received alendronate 70 mg/week orally and the other half did not receive this medication. The patients were monitored radiologically every 10 weeks and observed for a minimum of 24 months. At the end of the study, the mean HHS was 49.2±9.2 points in the control group and 74.4±7.8 points in the alendronate group. It was also demonstrated that only 2/29 femoral heads with AN (0/17 in Stage II, 2/12 in Stage III) collapsed in the group that received alendronate 70 mg/week, whereas in the group that was randomized to not receive this medication, collapse occurred in 19/25 (9/13 in Stage II, 10/12 in Stage III) femoral heads (p<0.001). One hip in the alendronate group underwent THA, whereas 16 hips in the control group underwent THA (p<0.001). Thus, they concluded that alendronate appeared to prevent early collapse of the femoral head in the hips with Steinberg Stage II or III C non-traumatic AVN.

In a study by Nishii et al. [15], 14 patients (20 hips) with ARCO I–III AVN received alendronate 5 mg/day and were compared in a nonrandomized manner with a group of 8 patients (13 hips) that did not receive alendronate. No patient used walking assistance such as crutches or canes during the study. All the patients received periodical radiologic evaluation at 3, 6, and 12 months. At the end of follow-up, the group of patients receiving alendronate had less pain and a lower frequency of femoral head collapse when compared with the control group. Specifically, they found progressive collapse occurred only in hips with extensive necrosis (greater than the medial 2/3 of the weight-bearing area of the femoral head with/without involvement of acetabula edge, termed Type C2 and C1, respectively) in both groups, which had a much higher incidence in the control groups. In total, collapse occurred in 6/13 of articulations in the control group and in only 1/20 in the alendronate group (p=0.008). Moreover, 2 of 13 hips in the control group needed THA, but none of patients needed surgery in the alendronate group. Therefore they suggested alendronate had the potential to prevent collapse of the femoral head, even with extensive necrosis, within 1 year.

Chen et al. recently performed a 2-year, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind study involving a total of 52 patients (65 hips) [12]. All patients presented with Steinberg Stage IIC or Stage IIIC osteonecrosis. Twenty-six patients (32 hips) were assigned to a scheme of alendronate 70 mg/week for 104 weeks and were compared with a group of 26 patients (33 hips) that received placebo. At the end of the study, MRI evaluation revealed that 21 of the 32 hips in the alendronate group and 20 of the 33 hips in the placebo group had progressed (P=0.636). Four of 32 hips in the alendronate treatment group underwent THA, and 5 of 33 hips in the placebo group had THA (P=0.837). No differences were noted in HHS, or Short Form 36 scores between the 2 groups. Thus, the extensive lesion of necrotic area might impair the prognosis of the AVN when alendronate was used.

LONG-TERM OUTCOMES ANALYSIS:

The long-term data was from a study by Agarwala et al., who presented a clinic radiological analysis of 395 hips with a mean follow-up of 4 years [14] and then further extended the follow-up of 40 patients (53 hips) with AVN to 10 years [13]; those patients were treated with oral alendronate for 3 years, and the data demonstrated although clinical functions showed a general trend of worsening after discontinuation, patients tolerated the decline well, as suggested by the reduction in pain of Ficat and Arlet Stage I–III patients 10 years after onset of alendronate treatment. More importantly, the rates of radiologic progression and femoral head collapse were markedly reduced even at 10 years as compared to the historical data available for natural history of hips with untreated AVN. At 10 years, 46 (87%) of the 53 hips survived, that is, had a satisfactory clinical result. Hip loss to arthroplasty occurred in 1 each of Stage I (7%) and Stage II (5%) hips and in 5 (26%) of Stage III hips. Of the 34 hips that were in pre-collapse stages at the onset of the study, at 10 years 10 had collapsed, indicating a collapse rate of 29% for a period of 10 years. Mean time to collapse was 4.2 years. They thereafter indicated that the benefit is particularly marked if the treatment is begun in the pre-collapse stages of the disease (Stage I or II). Even in Stage III hips some benefit was obtained from treatment with alendronate by at least a delay in the need for total hip replacement [13].

ADVERSE EVENTS ANALYSIS:

None of the studies noted serious adverse effects related to alendronate administration. The most common adverse effects across the studies were gastric dyspepsia mentioned in 3 studies [14,15,19] and dizziness mentioned in 2 studies [13,14], both of which occurred after treatment initiation and were self-limiting. No osteonecrosis of the jaw were seen irrespective of the dose or duration of alendronate.

Many surgical procedures have been described for preventing femoral collapse and progression of AVN. The most studied is core decompression, which works by reduction of intramedullary pressure inside the femoral head by making a drill hole, thus improving blood flow to bone. This procedure is mainly indicated in early-stage AVN [22]. Osteotomy could relocate the necrotic area of bone from the weight-loading area of the acetabulum, so as to redistribute the weight loading to articular cartilage, which is supported by healthy bone [23]. The increasingly applied method is bone graft, aiming to provide mechanical support to subchondral bone or cartilage. There are various types of bone grafting, some combined with osteotomy, osteochondral grafts, muscle pedicle bone grafts, and some are vascularized grafts to improve blood flow of the bone by achieving revascularization [24,25]. The new tantalum rod is made of a biocompatible material with 75% porosity. It has been used to replace the necrotic bone segment to prevent collapse in Steinberg Stage I–III femoral AVN. The presence of pores allows rapid bony ingrowth [26]. However, the efficacy and safety of the above procedures are still controversial [7,27–29]. Due to the reported efficacy of total hip arthroplasty and the typical age of patients with osteonecrosis, it has recently been questioned whether these invasive procedures are appropriate, given the potential difficulty of later conversion to a hip replacement [7,30].

Conservative treatment that helps improve function and delays femoral head deformity could be valuable time-buying strategy for some patients. Some of the pharmacologic agents that have been used to treat osteonecrosis of the hip are statins [31,32], anticoagulants [33,34], prostacyclin [35,36], and Bps [10–19]. The theoretical benefit of statins is based on the association of increased fat cell size with an increased risk of development of hip osteonecrosis [37,38]. Anticoagulants may inhibit the aggregation of platelets and enhance blood flow to ischemic areas of bone [34]. Prostacyclin may promote bone regeneration on a cellular or systemic level [35].

However, collapse of the femoral head appears to be a consequence of the non-coupling of bone reabsorption and bone regeneration rates. In this context, collapse could be prevented if the reabsorptive activity of the necrotic bone during the repair phase was inhibited or slowed until the formation of sufficient new bone [10]. This is the characteristic rationale for use of alendronate in AVN.

The efficacy of alendronate therapy of femoral head deformity was indicated by several experimental studies consisting of both adult rat and rabbit models induced by femoral head ischemia. In 2 closely related studies, alendronate given subcutaneously (200 mg/kg/d) was able to preserve femoral head structure in mature rats during a 6-week follow-up [39,40]. In another study [41], 3-week alendronate therapy reduced degeneration of articular cartilage and improved subchondral bone volume and mineral density in adult rabbits at 12 months, which therefore might be the reason that alendronate treatment could preserve the shape of the femoral head affected by AVN.

Regarding alendronate for the treatment of AVN in clinical trials, in the present review, only 8 articles were published. Our literature search found were 2 recent systematic reviews evaluating BPs for AVN, 1 of which only included 3 observational short-term studies in juveniles [10], and the other with 6 small short-term trials that reported substantial heterogeneities across studies in patient group (adults and adolescents) and treatments (other BPs and combined therapy) [11].

In contrast to previous reviews, the inclusion criteria of the current review were restricted to articles that studied alendronate treatment for adult AVN. We only analyzed alendronate because it was the most widely studied BPs for AVN. Due to ongoing debate on long-term effects of alendronate on the growing skeleton, we limited the studied population to only adults. The inclusion of most recent longer-term results and RCT would also help to update the previous evidence. Furthermore, after determining an overall profile of clinic outcome and the rates of radiographic and clinical failure, the collected data were further stratified by radiographic stage and by duration of follow-up to determine whether any of these factors influenced the results.

However, generally speaking, the studies included in the current review still present various limitations – most used observational non-controlled methods; small numbers of patients; different AVN stages of patients when treatment was initiated; and lack of uniformity in dose and time of alendronate use. These articles, in addition, had various durations of follow-up and were composed of various subgroups of patient populations [13,14].

Bearing in mind the above-mentioned limitations, most studies suggested a positive short-term and middle-term efficacy in pain reduction, improvement of articular function, slowing of bone collapse progression, and delaying the need for arthroplasty in adult AVN patients with the use of alendronate treatment. This is of great clinical significance, as most of the included patients are young or active patients who are likely to require a revision at some point in the future and the effective slowing of femoral head deformity by alendronate could help to avoid early THA. Favorable long-term results were also presented by Agarwala’s 10-year study in treated patients even after alendronate discontinuation [13]. In addition, there were no severe adverse effects associated with alendronate treatment observed during short- or long-term follow-up. Another finding of the current review is that although patients in all stages appeared to have potential benefit from alendronate treatment, the application in early AVN with small size lesion was suggested by most of the included studies. Specially, as shown in Chen’s study, when extensive osteonecrosis (Stage II C and III C) were radiographically presented, alendronate did not have any benefits. Thus, the efficacy of alendronate for AVN with large necrotic legions should be considered more carefully [12].

Conclusions

Our findings support consideration of alendronate use for AVN in adults because short-term and long-term favorable results could be expected, particularly with the early stage and with small necrotic size. Nevertheless, the lack of large-scale, randomized, and double-blind studies should be noted, and future studies should be developed to demonstrate the following aspects. 1) The detailed indication of AVN for alendronate treatment should be further clarified; for example, what type of AVN, traumatic or non-traumatic, which stage of AVN, including what size and what location of the necrotic lesion should be preferentially indicated. 2) There are a number of patient-specific factors that must be considered, including age, comorbidities, life expectancy, health, and activity level. 3) We also need to optimize the strategy of treatment, including timing of treatment initiation and alendronate therapy dose and duration.

References

1. Petrigliano FA, Lieberman JR, Osteonecrosis of the hip: novel approaches to evaluation and treatment: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007; 465; 53-62, pmid: 17906590

2. Lavernia CJ, Sierra RJ, Grieco FR, Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 1999; 7(4); 250-61, pmid: 10434079

3. Seamon J, Keller T, Saleh J, Cui Q, The pathogenesis of nontraumatic osteonecrosis: Arthritis, 2012; 2012; 601763, pmid: 23243507

4. Jergesen HE, Khan AS, The natural history of untreated asymptomatic hips in patients who have non-traumatic osteonecrosis: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1997; 79(3); 359-63, pmid: 9070523

5. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Plate JF, Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in young adults with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a comparative study: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006; 88(Suppl 3); 104-9, pmid: 17079375

6. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Marker DR, Use of metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006; 88(Suppl 3); 90-97, pmid: 17079373

7. Marker DR, Seyler TM, McGrath MS, Treatment of early stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008; 90(Suppl 4); 175-87, pmid: 18984729

8. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF, Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002; 84-A(2); 171-77, pmid: 11861721

9. Dorr LD, Takei GK, Conaty JP, Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1983; 65(4); 474-79, pmid: 6833321

10. Young ML, Little DG, Kim HK, Evidence for using bisphosphonate to treat Legg-Calve-Perthes disease: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012; 470(9); 2462-75, pmid: 22270467

11. Cardozo JB, Andrade DM, Santiago MB, The use of bisphosphonate in the treatment of avascular necrosis: a systematic review: Clin Rheumatol, 2008; 27(6); 685-88, pmid: 18270760

12. Chen CH, Chang JK, Lai KA, Alendronate in the prevention of collapse of the femoral head in nontraumatic osteonecrosis: a two-year multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study: Arthritis Rheum, 2012; 64(5); 1572-78, pmid: 22127729

13. Agarwala S, Shah SB, Ten-year follow-up of avascular necrosis of femoral head treated with alendronate for 3 years: J Arthroplasty, 2011; 26(7); 1128-34, pmid: 21256699

14. Agarwala S, Shah S, Joshi VR, The use of alendronate in the treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head: follow-up to eight years: J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2009; 91(8); 1013-18, pmid: 19651826

15. Nishii T, Sugano N, Miki H, Does alendronate prevent collapse in osteonecrosis of the femoral head?: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006; 443; 273-79, pmid: 16462451

16. Lai KA, Shen WJ, Yang CY, The use of alendronate to prevent early collapse of the femoral head in patients with nontraumatic osteonecrosis. A randomized clinical study: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005; 87(10); 2155-59, pmid: 16203877

17. Agarwala S, Jain D, Joshi VR, Sule A, Efficacy of alendronate, a bisphosphonate, in the treatment of AVN of the hip. A prospective open-label study: Rheumatology, 2005; 44(3); 352-59, pmid: 15572396

18. Agarwala S, Sule A, Pai BU, Joshi VR, Alendronate in the treatment of avascular necrosis of the hip: Rheumatology, 2002; 41(3); 346-47, pmid: 11934975

19. Shu-Qing C, You-Jin C, Hou-Ming Z, Jian Q, Clinical efficacy of alendronate treatment of early-stage adult nontraumatic avascular necrosis of femoral head: Chinese Journal of Geriatrics, 2011; 30(8); 661-63

20. Phillips Bob DS, Ball Chris, Doug Badenoch: Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine – Levels of Evidence 3, 2009

21. Mont MA, Marulanda GA, Jones LC, Systematic analysis of classification systems for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006; 88(Suppl 3); 16-26, pmid: 17079363

22. Rajagopal M, Balch Samora J, Ellis TJ, Efficacy of core decompression as treatment for osteonecrosis of the hip: a systematic review: Hip Int, 2012; 22(5); 489-93, pmid: 23100153

23. Shannon BD, Trousdale RT, Femoral osteotomies for avascular necrosis of the femoral head: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2004(418); 34-40, pmid: 15043090

24. Ali SA, Christy JM, Griesser MJ, Treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head utilising free vascularised fibular graft: a systematic review: Hip Int, 2014; 24(1); 5-13, pmid: 24062224

25. Fang T, Zhang EW, Sailes FC, Vascularized fibular grafts in patients with avascular necrosis of femoral head: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2013; 133(1); 1-10, pmid: 23076656

26. Varitimidis SE, Dimitroulias AP, Karachalios TS, Outcome after tantalum rod implantation for treatment of femoral head osteonecrosis: 26 hips followed for an average of 3 years: Acta Orthop, 2009; 80(1); 20-25, pmid: 19297785

27. Chan KL, Mok CC, Glucocorticoid-induced avascular bone necrosis: diagnosis and management: Open Orthop J, 2012; 6; 449-57, pmid: 23115605

28. Koo KH, Kim R, Kim YS, Risk period for developing osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients on steroid treatment: Clinical rheumatology, 2002; 21(4); 299-303, pmid: 12189457

29. Vail TP, Urbaniak JR, Donor-site morbidity with use of vascularized autogenous fibular grafts: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1996; 78(2); 204-11, pmid: 8609110

30. Hungerford DS, Treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: everything’s new: J Arthroplasty, 2007; 22(4 Suppl 1); 91-94, pmid: 17570286

31. Pritchett JW, Statin therapy decreases the risk of osteonecrosis in patients receiving steroids: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001(386); 173-78, pmid: 11347831

32. Wang GJ, Cui Q, Balian G, The Nicolas Andry award. The pathogenesis and prevention of steroid-induced osteonecrosis: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000(370); 295-310, pmid: 10660725

33. Wang Y, Yin L, Li Y, Preventive effects of puerarin on alcohol-induced osteonecrosis: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2008; 466(5); 1059-67, pmid: 18350350

34. Glueck CJ, Freiberg RA, Sieve L, Wang P, Enoxaparin prevents progression of stages I and II osteonecrosis of the hip: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2005(435); 164-70, pmid: 15930934

35. Jager M, Tillmann FP, Thornhill TS, Rationale for prostaglandin I2 in bone marrow oedema – from theory to application: Arthritis Res Ther, 2008; 10(5); R120, pmid: 18834533

36. Disch AC, Matziolis G, Perka C, The management of necrosis-associated and idiopathic bone-marrow oedema of the proximal femur by intravenous iloprost: J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2005; 87(4); 560-64, pmid: 15795211

37. Wang GJ, Moga DB, Richemer WG, Cortisone induced bone changes and its response to lipid clearing agents: Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1978(130); 81-85, pmid: 639410

38. Wang GJ, Sweet DE, Reger SI, Thompson RC, Fat-cell changes as a mechanism of avascular necrosis of the femoral head in cortisone-treated rabbits: J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1977; 59(6); 729-35, pmid: 908695

39. Peled E, Bejar J, Zinman C, Alendronate preserves femoral head shape and height/length ratios in an experimental rat model: A computer-assisted analysis: Indian J Orthop, 2009; 43(1); 22-26, pmid: 19753175

40. Peled E, Bejar J, Zinman C, Prevention of distortion of vascular deprivation-induced osteonecrosis of the rat femoral head by treatment with alendronate: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2009; 129(2); 275-79, pmid: 18523789

41. Hofstaetter JG, Wang J, Yan J, Glimcher MJ, The effects of alendronate in the treatment of experimental osteonecrosis of the hip in adult rabbits: Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2009; 17(3); 362-70, pmid: 18786840

In Press

Clinical Research  

Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027  

Clinical Research  

Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516  

Review article  

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Review

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283  

Clinical Research  

Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 Adults

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   10,187,196

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,708,487

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,341,643

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   706,524

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750