06 January 2004
A comparison of suture retention strengths for three biomaterials
F. Joseph Obermiller, Jason P. Hodde, Chad S. McAlexander, Klod Kokini, Stephen F. BadylakMed Sci Monit 2004; 10(1): PI1-5 :: ID: 11558
Abstract
Background:The suture holding capacity, suture retention strength, and burst strength of three biomaterials (Marlex®, SIS, and PeriGuard®) were evaluated to compare their performance characteristics in an ex vivo setting representing the immediate postoperative period.Material/Methods: A circular defect was created in the fascial tissue of the abdominal aponeurosis collected from normal dogs. Defects were repaired with either Marlex (polypropylene mesh), Periguard (bovine pericardium) or small intestinal submucosa (SIS) using 2–0 prolene and a 1.0-cm suture bite. The force required to induce failure at the repair site was recorded as the suture-holding capacity. Suture retention strength was calculated as the load distribution over the specimen cross-section in contact with the suture at the time of rupture. Burst strength of the raw materials was also measured.Results: The suture-holding capacity was 370.9±56.2 N for Marlex; 214.3±36.1 N for Periguard, and 287.9±34.3 N for SIS. The suture retention strengths were: Marlex, 413.4±59.7 N/mm2; Periguard, 97.0±20.1 N/mm2; and SIS, 106.9±12.7 N/mm2. The burst strength of Marlex, Periguard and SIS were 476.7±50.8 N, 432.12±82.1 N, and 433.6±79.5 N respectively.Conclusions: All three materials provide adequate strength and suture-holding capacities to be of use in the repair of soft tissue defects.
Keywords: Biocompatible Materials, Biomechanics, Connective Tissue - injuries, Connective Tissue - physiology, Connective Tissue - surgery, Dogs, Intestinal Mucosa - transplantation, Materials Testing - instrumentation, Polypropylenes, Sutures, Swine, Transplantation, Heterologous, Biocompatible Materials, Biomechanical Phenomena, Connective Tissue - surgery, Dogs, Intestinal Mucosa - transplantation, Materials Testing - instrumentation, Polypropylenes, Sutures, Swine, Transplantation, Heterologous
606 36
Editorial
01 May 2023 : Editorial
Editorial: Twenty Years On from Sequencing the Human Genome, Personalized/Precision Oncology Prepares to Meet the Challenges of Checkpoint Inhibitor TherapyDOI: 10.12659/MSM.940911
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940911
In Press
28 May 2023 : Database Analysis
Scientometric and Visualized Analysis of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: 1988-2021Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938715
25 May 2023 : Database Analysis
The COVID-19 Crisis and the Incidence of Alcohol-Related Deaths in PolandMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.940904
25 May 2023 : Review article
A Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies in Support of the Role of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.940635
25 May 2023 : Clinical Research
Periapical Lesions and Missed Canals in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Stud...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.940533
Most Viewed Current Articles
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
30 Dec 2021 : Clinical Research
Retrospective Study of Outcomes and Hospitalization Rates of Patients in Italy with a Confirmed Diagnosis o...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935379
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e935379
08 Mar 2022 : Review article
A Review of the Potential Roles of Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Pharmacological Approaches for the Man...DOI :10.12659/MSM.936292
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e936292
01 Jan 2022 : Editorial
Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952