01 March 2006
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: An independent assessment of outcomesin a difficult patient population.
Bradley K. Weiner, Hoan-Vu Nguyen, S. Will HazardMed Sci Monit 2006; 12(3): CR99-102 :: ID: 447105
Abstract
Background: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is becoming increasinglypopular for the surgical treatment of lumbar degenerative conditions. However, the outcomes followingthe procedure have only begun to be evaluated. Material/Methods: The authors reviewed all patients previouslytreated by TLIF at our tertiary center with minimum two year follow-up. Between 1997 and 2001, twenty-sevenpatients underwent the procedure. They were evaluated clinically and radiographically at regular intervalsfor a minimum two years following surgery and longer term follow-up was carried out by telephone interview.Long-term follow-up was undertaken by an independent assessor (a spine surgeon not directly involvedin the patient's care) and outcomes were assessed using the measure designed by Macnab/McCulloch/An.Follow-up averaged 30 months and ranged from 24 to 42 months. Results: All but two patients obtaineda solid radiographic arthrodesis and complications were few. However, only eleven patients obtained excellentor good clinical results, while 16 had fair or poor outcomes. Conclusions: TLIF is a technically demandingprocedure which can be done with relatively few complications and offers excellent rates of arthrodesis.However, the outcomes of the procedure and indications for the procedure in difficult patient populationsclearly require further study.
Keywords: Diskectomy - statistics & numerical data, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Follow-Up Studies, Laminectomy - statistics & numerical data, Spinal Diseases - surgery, Spinal Fusion - statistics & numerical data, Time Factors
Editorial
01 July 2026 : Editorial
Editorial: The WHO Identifies Ebola Disease Due to Bundibugyo Virus as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) as Vaccine Development AcceleratesDOI: 10.12659/MSM.954627
Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e954627
In Press
Clinical Research
Comparative Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Care Model vs Usual Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Longitudinal C...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.953211
Clinical Research
Impact of Treatment Modality on Pain, Sexual Function, and Psychological Well-Being in Patients With Bartho...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952422
Clinical Research
Association Between Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis, Pre-Fracture Mobility, and Hip Fracture Patterns in O...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952678
Clinical Research
Association Between Total Cholesterol–to–High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio and Gestational Hypertension: A Cas...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952395
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 14,176,084
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,757,530
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,466,116
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 708,768
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






