Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

22 December 2006

The efficacy of hydrotalcite compared with OTC famotidine in the on-demand treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A non-inferiority trial

Jan W. Konturek, Manfred Beneke, Ralf Koppermann, Marianne Petersen-Braun, Ulrike Weingärtner

Med Sci Monit 2007; 13(1): CR44-49 :: ID: 470149

Abstract

Background: Antacids and gastric acid inhibitors are effective in the self-treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim was to investigate onset of action of the antacid hydrotalcite compared
with the OTC H2-receptor antagonist famotidine in patients suffering from heartburn.
Material/Methods: A total of 53 patients with endoscopically diagnosed GERD grade 0–1 took part in this open, randomized, parallel-group comparison trial: 26 patients received a single dose of 1000 mg hydrotalcite and 27 patients a single dose of 10 mg famotidine on the occasion of a symptomatic reflux
episode. Severity of heartburn and accompanying symptoms were documented on a four-point verbal rating scale (VRS) at baseline and up to four hours after intake. Onset and duration of action were defined by the number of patients experiencing improvement of heartburn from severe or
moderate to mild or none compared with baseline.
Results: Hydrotalcite was significantly superior (p

Keywords: Aluminum Hydroxide - therapeutic use, Antacids - therapeutic use, Anti-Ulcer Agents - therapeutic use, Demography, Famotidine - therapeutic use, Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy, Magnesium Hydroxide - therapeutic use, Nonprescription Drugs - therapeutic use

Add Comment 0 Comments

Editorial

01 July 2026 : Editorial  

Editorial: The WHO Identifies Ebola Disease Due to Bundibugyo Virus as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) as Vaccine Development Accelerates

Dinah V. Parums ORCID logo

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.954627

Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e954627

0:00

In Press

Clinical Research  

Comparative Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Care Model vs Usual Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Longitudinal C...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.953211  

Clinical Research  

Impact of Treatment Modality on Pain, Sexual Function, and Psychological Well-Being in Patients With Bartho...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952422  

Clinical Research  

Association Between Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis, Pre-Fracture Mobility, and Hip Fracture Patterns in O...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952678  

Clinical Research  

Association Between Total Cholesterol–to–High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio and Gestational Hypertension: A Cas...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952395  

Most Viewed Current Articles

17 Jan 2024 : Review article   14,176,084

Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron Variant

DOI :10.12659/MSM.942799

Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799

0:00

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research   3,757,530

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

0:00

14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research   2,466,116

Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase Levels

DOI :10.12659/MSM.937990

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990

0:00

16 May 2023 : Clinical Research   708,768

Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387

Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387

0:00

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750