01 July 1999
Diagnostic value of the Pressure Relief Index in chronic venous insufficiency patients
Marek Ciecierski, Arkadiusz Jawień, Tomasz GrzelaMed Sci Monit 1999; 5(4): CR697-702 :: ID: 503492
Abstract
We evaluated pressure relief index (PRI) values in patients with chronic venous insufficiency. The study group comprised 15 healthy subjects and 71 patients. We determined the venous pressure in the orthostatic position, during exersion and following exercise. We repeated the procedure after the placement of a pressure cuff, located above the ankles. We estimated the pressure at rest (p-s), the lowest pressure during exersion (p-min.), the time needed to obtain normal pressure values (RT), 90% of RT and the Pressure Relief Index (PRI). The following groups were formed: group I - 19 healthy limbs, group II Ñ 17 limbs with superficial varices, group III- 4 limbs with superficial varices and varicose ulcers, group IV - 22 limbs with the postphlebitis syndrome, without varicose ulcers, group V - 43 limbs with the postphlebitis syndrome and ulcerations. Curves demonstrated the groups distribution of venous pressures. PRI values of healthy subjects amounted to an average of 1826 and were statistically higher, in comparison with the other groups (p < 0.001). PRI values were as follows: group II - 915, group III - 377.5, group IV - 530.6, group V - 176.6. p < 0.05 was considered as stastically significant. During the cuff test PRI values in group II increased to 1399.5, contrary to group III and IV values. A similar difference was observed between group V (PRI - 286.7) and group IV. PRI values below 300 consisted with a70% risk of varicose ulcerations.
Keywords: pressure relief index, Diagnosis, Venous Insufficiency
Editorial
01 July 2026 : Editorial
Editorial: The WHO Identifies Ebola Disease Due to Bundibugyo Virus as a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) as Vaccine Development AcceleratesDOI: 10.12659/MSM.954627
Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e954627
In Press
Clinical Research
Comparative Effectiveness of a Nurse-Led Care Model vs Usual Care in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Longitudinal C...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.953211
Clinical Research
Impact of Treatment Modality on Pain, Sexual Function, and Psychological Well-Being in Patients With Bartho...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952422
Clinical Research
Association Between Radiographic Knee Osteoarthritis, Pre-Fracture Mobility, and Hip Fracture Patterns in O...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952678
Clinical Research
Association Between Total Cholesterol–to–High-Density Lipoprotein Ratio and Gestational Hypertension: A Cas...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.952395
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 14,176,084
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,757,530
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,466,116
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 708,768
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






