23 June 2009
The radioprotective effect of alpha2-macroglobulin: a morphological study of rat liver
Mirjana MihailovicABCD, Verica MilosevicD, Ilijana GrigorovCD, Goran PoznanovicDF, Svetlana Ivanovic-MaticCD, Nevena GrdovicCD, Desanka BogojevicACDEMed Sci Monit 2009; 15(7): BR188-193 :: ID: 869703
Abstract
Background
Administration of the acute-phase protein alpha2-macroglobulin (MG) prior to total-body irradiation of rats with a 6.7 Gy (LD50) dose of X-rays exerts a radioprotective effect.
Material and Method
MG was administered 30 min before irradiation with a 6.7 Gy (LD50) dose of X-rays. Its radioprotective efficacy was compared with that of the synthetic agent amifostine (WR-2721), a sulfhydryl compound which is currently the most effective radioprotector in clinical use. After administration of either MG or amifostine, changes in body and liver weight were recorded and histological liver sections were examined during a four-week follow-up period.
Results
As observed in the experimental group administered amifostine, rats that received MG prior to irradiation exhibited 100% survival and restoration of the body and liver weight to the control values. The morphological damage seen in the liver after irradiation of untreated rats was absent in both the MG- and amifostine-pretreated rats. Also, hepatocytes and granulated cells had prominent nuclei and did not exhibit major changes in volume. Dilation of the central vein was not observed.
Conclusions
Administration of MG before irradiation, similar to pretreatment with amifostine, provided complete survival of experimental rats and recovery of liver weight and preserved major histological parameters of the liver.
Keywords: alpha-Macroglobulins - pharmacology, Radiation-Protective Agents - pharmacology, Organ Size - drug effects, Liver - pathology, Body Weight - drug effects, Amifostine - pharmacology
Editorial
01 January 2026 : Editorial
Editorial: Increasing Awareness of Lung Cancer in Non-Smokers and Never-Smokers Challenges Current Approaches to Prevention and ScreeningDOI: 10.12659/MSM.952454
Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e952454
In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387






