21 January 2026: Review Articles
Role of Oxysterol-Binding Protein Family in Cholesterol Metabolism and Cancer Progression: A Review
Yu Wu ABCDEF 1, Xinhui Lv BC 1, Jiyuan Yang BC 1, Sicong Liu C 1, Yafang Chen A 1, Ziwen Yuan F 1, Xudong Wang AEG 2*
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.949032
Med Sci Monit 2026; 32:e949032
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The oxysterol-binding protein–related proteins (ORPs) represent an evolutionarily conserved family of lipid-binding and transport proteins that serve as critical regulators of cellular lipid homeostasis, membrane trafficking, and signaling networks in eukaryotes. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that ORPs exert profound influence on oncogenic processes through their ability to modulate tumor cell proliferation, survival, and metastatic potential via distinct molecular mechanisms. Our review provides an integrated analysis of ORP family members, highlighting their structurally conserved oxysterol-binding domains and functionally divergent roles in cancer biology: (1) oncogenic ORPs (ORP2-5) that drive tumor progression through lipid metabolic reprogramming; (2) tumor-suppressive ORP8 that constrains malignant transformation; (3) immunomodulatory ORP9 involved in pancreatic cancer microenvironment regulation; and (4) ORP6/7 and ORP10/11 that govern cell motility and metabolic pathways respectively, with emerging but incompletely understood roles in neoplasia. Importantly, we discuss the translational relevance of ORP targeting, exemplified by the development of specific pharmacological inhibitors (Orpinolide and Ornithogalum saundersiae steroidal saponin-1) that disrupt oxysterol-binding protein/ORP4-mediated lipid transfer in cancer cells. By synthesizing current knowledge across solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, this work establishes a conceptual framework for understanding ORP-mediated oncogenesis and explores their potential as therapeutic targets in precision oncology approaches.
Keywords: Therapy Animals, Cancer Survivors, Cholesterol
Introduction
The family of oxysterol-binding protein–related proteins (ORPs) represents a class of highly conserved lipid transport and signaling molecules, which are essential for various cellular processes such as lipid metabolism, lipid transport, and signal transduction [1–3]. Among these, the most extensively studied are human ORPs and yeast oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP) homologues (Osh) [1]. Human ORPs are systematically classified into 6 distinct classes (denoted by Roman numerals): Class I includes OSBP and ORP4, which enhance the invasiveness and metastasis of tumor cells [4–7]; Class II includes ORP1 and ORP2; Class III includes ORP3, which regulates cell polarity, adhesion, and migration [8], and ORP6 and ORP7, which also regulate cell adhesion and migration [9,10]; Class IV contains ORP5, which increases cell invasion and metastasis [11], and ORP8, which regulates apoptosis [12,13]; Class V includes ORP9, which maintains the functional integrity of the early secretory pathway [14]; and Class VI includes ORP10, which regulates lipoprotein B-100 secretion [15], and ORP11, which is associated with lipogenesis [16]. Osh4p (also known as Kes1p), the simplest and most extensively characterized member of the yeast Osh family, serves as a representative model for structural and functional studies [17]. Unlike other Osh proteins, Osh4p contains only the OSBP-related domain (ORD) and lacks the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain [18]. Im et al [19] reported that Osh4p can form complexes with 5 different sterols, including cholesterol and ergosterol. Its structural core features a β-barrel composed of 19 antiparallel β-strands, which forms a hydrophobic pocket to accommodate sterols [19]. This pocket is capped by a lid-like structure that remains closed upon sterol binding [19]. Antonny et al further discovered that the lid of Osh4p forms a membrane-bound α-helix, known as the ArfGAP1 lipid-packing sensor motif [20]. The opening of the lid reveals basic amino acid residues adjacent to the ligand-binding cavity, facilitating interactions with negatively charged lipid head groups on the membrane [17,21]. This mechanism facilitates the extraction of sterols from the lipid bilayer.
ORPs are a class of lipid-transferring proteins that play crucial roles in the intracellular distribution of sterols and phosphatidylserine [22]. These lipids are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and are primarily distributed to the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and plasma membrane (PM) [23–26]. Sterols help maintain membrane rigidity and structural integrity [23,25], while phosphatidylserine – an anionic phospholipid – recruits signaling proteins to the inner leaflet of the PM through electrostatic interactions [25,26]. This asymmetric distribution of sterols and phosphatidylserine relies on the coupling of ORPs to the metabolism of phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI4P), one of the most abundant phosphatidylinositols in eukaryotes [22]. PI4P is generated by the phosphorylation of phosphatidylinositol at the 4-position of the inositol ring [27]. PI4P regulates cell growth, proliferation, lipid biosynthesis, and transport, and exacerbates these processes through oncogenic signaling pathways [28]. Studies show that ORPs facilitate the extraction of sterols or phosphatidylserine from the ER and exchange them with PI4P in the TGN and PM, where PI4P is catalytically generated by PI-4 kinase [22]. Subsequently, ORPs translocate PI4P back to the ER membrane, where it is hydrolyzed by the phosphatase Sac1 [22]. The continuous synthesis and hydrolysis of PI4P drive this exchange cycle, leading to the accumulation of sterols and phosphatidylserine in the TGN and/or PM, thereby creating lipid distribution asymmetry [29,30]. In addition to cholesterol transport, ORPs are implicated in regulating cell proliferation, survival, and migration [31]. ORPs play key roles in signaling by interacting with a variety of proteins. For example, ORP2 has been shown to modulate cell adhesion through its downregulation-mediated activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) [32], while ORP5 promotes cellular proliferation by activating the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling pathway [33]. These functions highlight the multifaceted roles of ORPs in both cell physiology and pathology.
In mammals, cholesterol is the predominant sterol, accounting for about 20% of total cellular lipids [22]. Its metabolites, including oxysterols and steroid hormones, serve multiple functions in different physiological processes [34]. The liver, the primary organ for cholesterol synthesis, delivers endogenously synthesized and exogenously ingested cholesterol into the bloodstream in the form of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) for systemic cellular use [35]. Intracellular cholesterol homeostasis is maintained primarily through the uptake of LDL cholesterol via the LDL receptor (LDLR)-mediated endocytic pathway [36]. The LDL/LDLR complex is internalized and delivered to late endosomes/lysosomes, where LDL-derived cholesteryl esters are hydrolyzed to free cholesterol by acid lipases. Subsequently, cholesterol is transported to other membrane structures, including the ER, via Niemann-Pick type C1/2 proteins and ORPs [37]. Dysregulation of cholesterol homeostasis has been closely linked to various cancers [38,39]. Aberrations in cholesterol metabolism in tumor cells are primarily characterized by upregulation of cholesterol synthesis, increased uptake and accumulation of cholesterol metabolites, which in turn promote tumorigenesis and cancer progression [40–42]. On one hand, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR), the rate-limiting enzyme for cholesterol synthesis, is overexpressed in several tumors, including gastric, ovarian, glioma, and prostate cancers [43–46]. Its inhibition has been explored as a therapeutic strategy for castration-resistant prostate cancer and hematological malignancies [47]. On the other hand, LDLR, which mediates cholesterol uptake, is frequently overexpressed in tumor cells [48,49], and LDL has been shown to promote tumor growth and invasion by regulating NF-κB signaling [50]. Sterol regulatory element-binding protein 2 (SREBP2) is a key regulator of cholesterol synthesis and uptake [51]. When cellular cholesterol levels are low, SREBP2 is activated, upregulating the expression of HMGCR and LDLR to enhance cholesterol synthesis and uptake [52]. Conversely, when cholesterol is in excess, the SREBP2 pathway is inhibited, and excess cholesterol is esterified by acyl–coenzyme A: cholesterol acyltransferase 1 and stored in lipid droplets [53]. Several ORPs have been shown to play important roles in cholesterol metabolism regulation [32,54–56]. For instance, in human epithelial cell carcinoma, ORP2 promotes LDL-derived cholesterol transport and activates FAK [32]; ORP8 downregulates SREBP2 to inhibit cholesterol synthesis and uptake [54]; ORP5 induces SREBP2 expression to enhance cholesterol metabolism [55]; and in the absence of ORP9 and GRAM domain-containing proteins (GRAMD1s), SREBP2 is even more active, further promoting cholesterol synthesis and uptake [56]. These findings suggest that ORPs influence tumor development by modulating cholesterol metabolism. Despite the considerable research on ORP2, ORP3, ORP4, ORP5, ORP8, and ORP9, their associations with cancer have not been extensively discussed. In this review, we aim to summarize the structural and functional characteristics of these ORPs, their contributions to tumor development, and their potential therapeutic value.
Major Structural Features of ORPs
Human ORPs share a conserved C-terminal ORD, which facilitates the transport of cholesterol from the ER to the Golgi apparatus [18]. In addition to the ORD, most ORPs possess upstream structural domains that enable them to target specific subcellular membrane organelles [57]. These include an N-terminal PH that recognizes PI4P and small G proteins (Arf1-GTP) on the Golgi complex [58,59]. ORPs containing an N-terminal PH domain are typically classified as long isoform proteins, while those lacking this domain are referred to as short isoform proteins [60]. Furthermore, certain ORPs feature an FFAT motif (2 phenylalanines [FF] within an acidic tract) located between the ORD and PH domains. This motif is recognized by the ER membrane proteins vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein A or B (VAPA or VAPB) through their major sperm protein domains (Table 1) [58,61,62]. This interaction targets ORPs to the ER, enabling their participation in cholesterol transport and signaling processes.
Functional Features of ORPs
ORP2 INHIBITS CELL ADHESION:
Takahashi et al demonstrated that the rapid degradation of ORP2 facilitates the transport of cholesterol from late endosomes to recycling endosomes, where it promotes the activation of FAK/integrin signaling [32]. This process is mediated by cholesterol enhancing the binding of FAK to lipid bilayers containing phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI[4,5]P2) [32]. Activated FAK, in turn, increases the activity of endosomal phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase type I gamma, leading to the elevated production of PI(4,5)P2 [70]. Deletion of ORP2 amplifies FAK activity and PI(4,5)P2 generation on endosomal membranes, thereby strengthening cell adhesion [71]. Furthermore, ORP2 knockdown redirects PI(4,5)P2 to late endosomes containing Niemann-Pick type C1 protein, influencing renal tubular dynamics [32,72]. The interplay between ORP2 deletion and FAK activation efficiently channels cholesterol to the plasma membrane, stimulating cell adhesion and highlighting the critical role of ORP2 in regulating cholesterol trafficking and cellular adhesion processes [32].
ORP3 INDUCES R-RAS ACTIVATION AND PROMOTES CELL MIGRATION AND INVASION:
Studies have revealed that the phosphorylation status of ORP3 plays a critical role in determining its subcellular localization and protein-protein interactions [73]. Hyperphosphorylated ORP3 specifically interacts with VAPA, and the PH domain of ORP3 facilitates the targeting of the ORP3-VAPA complex to the PM [73]. ORP3 exhibits dual targeting capabilities, localizing to both the ER and the PM, where it induces the activation of the small GTPase R-Ras [73]. This activation triggers downstream signaling pathways, including Akt phosphorylation and β1 integrin activation [8]. The co-expression of ORP3 and VAPA at ER-PM contact sites enhances R-Ras activation, a process that relies on the interaction of ORP3 with both VAPA and the PM [73]. Furthermore, the interaction between ORP3 and R-Ras has been shown to regulate cell adhesion and drive the migration and invasion of tumor cells [8], underscoring the multifaceted role of ORP3 in cellular signaling and cancer progression.
ORP5 AND ORP8:
ORP5 and ORP8, members of the class IV ORPs, are characterized by the presence of PH domains but lack the FFAT motif [74]. These proteins are directly anchored to the ER through a C-terminal transmembrane segment [74]. Functionally, ORP5 and ORP8 facilitate the enrichment of phosphatidylserine at the ER by exchanging it for PI4P, which is subsequently dephosphorylated by the ER-localized phosphatase Sac1 [75]. The recruitment of ORP5/8 to the PM is mediated by interactions between their PH and phosphoinositide-binding domains with PI4P and PI(4,5)P2 (Figure 1) [76]. Additionally, PI(4,5)P2 can undergo translocation during this process. By regulating the levels of phosphatidylserine and phosphoinositides at the PM, ORP5/8 play a critical role in modulating cellular processes such as proliferation and migration, potentially through the activation of key signaling kinases, including KRas and protein kinase B (AKT) [76].
DELETION OF ORP9 AND GRAMD1S LEADS TO DYSREGULATION OF CHOLESTEROL HOMEOSTASIS:
Oxysterol-binding protein–related protein 9 long isoform (ORP9L), containing a PH domain, is distributed between the ER and the Golgi apparatus in a VAP-dependent manner, and its forced overexpression disrupts the organization of the ER and ER-Golgi intermediate compartments [77]. The FFAT and sterol-binding domains of ORP9L facilitate its retention in the ER, while the PH domain promotes its association with the TGN [14]. Naito et al [56] demonstrated that ORP9 regulates Golgi cholesterol levels by modulating OSBP activity through the extraction of PI4P from the TGN. When cholesterol levels in the TGN membrane surpass a specific threshold, GRAMD1s (also known as Asters) transport excess cholesterol to the ER, thereby preventing cholesterol accumulation in the Golgi [78]. When ORP9 and GRAMD1s are simultaneously depleted, OSBP is overactivated, cholesterol transport to the ER is less efficient, and SREBP2 is more active under these conditions, which promotes cholesterol synthesis and uptake [56]. This dysregulation triggers aberrant cholesterol synthesis and accumulation in the Golgi and post-Golgi membranes. These findings underscore the critical role of ORP9 in maintaining cholesterol homeostasis.
ORPs and Cancer
ORP4 PROMOTES TUMOR CELL GROWTH AND PROLIFERATION:
ORP4 exhibits selective and limited expression in normal tissues, primarily localized to specific regions of the brain, retina, and testes [4,5]. However, it is notably overexpressed in ovarian cancer cell lines and patient-derived T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells, where it drives tumor cell proliferation [79,80]. ORP4, which is not present in healthy T cells but is highly expressed in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells, plays a critical role in supporting a signaling complex composed of CD3ɛ, Gαq/11, and phospholipase Cβ3 (PLC-β3) [81]. Specifically, ORP4L extracts PI(4,5)P2 from the PM and delivers it to PLC-β3 for hydrolysis, facilitating downstream signaling [81]. Charman et al [5] demonstrated that knockdown of ORP4 in HEK293 (human embryonic kidney cells) or HeLa (cervical cancer cells) induces growth arrest, while depletion of ORP4 in untransformed intestinal epithelial cells triggers cell death. Bensen et al [80] further revealed that under conditions mimicking the ovarian cancer microenvironment, where exogenous cholesterol supply is limited, targeting ORP4 with the small molecule compound Ornithogalum saundersiae steroidal saponin-1 (OSW-1) significantly enhances its anti-proliferative activity. These findings underscore the role of ORP4 in promoting tumor cell growth and proliferation. Moreover, the anticancer effects of OSW-1 have been validated in a leukemia model [79,82] and in ovarian cancer 3-dimensional spheroids [80], where it demonstrates superior efficacy compared with conventional ovarian cancer treatments, such as cisplatin and paclitaxel. Collectively, these studies highlight ORP4 as a promising therapeutic target for precision cancer therapy.
ORP8 INHIBITS TUMOR CELL GROWTH AND PROLIFERATION AND PROMOTES APOPTOSIS:
Studies have demonstrated that ORP8 expression inhibits cell proliferation and tumor growth while promoting apoptosis [83,84]. Yan et al found that ORP8 reduces cholesterol efflux by suppressing the expression of ATP-binding cassette transporter A1, underscoring its essential role in the progression of atherosclerotic lesions [85]. Zhou et al also found that ORP8 suppresses the target genes of Sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (SREBP1) and SREBP2, functioning as a negative modulator of intracellular cholesterol balance and consequently restraining cell growth and proliferation [54]. Zhong et al reported that ORP8 is significantly under-expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines, and its overexpression induces apoptosis [12]. In HepG2 cells (a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line), ORP8 overexpression triggers the ER stress response, leading to the upregulation of Fas ligand. This facilitates the transport of Fas ligand, expressed in T lymphocytes, to the cell membrane via P53-mediated trafficking, where it binds to Fas on the cell surface, ultimately inducing apoptosis [12]. Additionally, Guo et al [83] found that ORP8 expression is markedly reduced in gastric cancer tissues and cell lines. Elevated expression of ORP8 markedly curtails the proliferation of gastric cancer cells and restrains tumor growth in vivo. ORP8 overexpression affects cellular function through a dual mechanism: on the one hand, it regulates cellular activity by inhibiting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (manifested by the downregulation of Wnt3a and β-catenin expression); on the other hand, ORP8 overexpression induces ER stress, which is specifically reflected by the upregulation of the expression of ER stress markers, including C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) and glucose-regulated protein 78, and the increased levels of protein kinase R-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) phosphorylation [83]. Notably, they found that inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress reversed the downregulation of Wnt3a/β-catenin expression caused by ORP8 overexpression [83]. In summary, ORP8 exerts its function as a tumor suppressor by inducing apoptosis and inhibiting key signaling pathways.
ORP2 INHIBITS MIGRATION AND INVASION OF COLORECTAL CANCER CELLS THROUGH INHIBITION OF COLLAGEN I INHIBITION:
ORP2 facilitates the exchange of PI4P for cholesterol between adjacent membranes [86], enhancing cholesterol influx and synthesis while reducing efflux, thereby modulating the tumor microenvironment. The extracellular matrix of tumors, a critical component of the tumor microenvironment, consists of structural elements such as collagen and glycoproteins [87]. Notably, collagen type I is highly expressed in infiltrative colorectal cancer (CRC) [88]. ORP2 deficiency has been shown to promote collagen I-induced CRC cell growth, adhesion patch formation, migration, and invasion [89]. This suggests that collagen I could serve as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target within the tumor microenvironment for CRC treatment. Lin et al further demonstrated that ORP2 is associated with a favorable prognosis in metastatic CRC and significantly suppresses collagen I-induced focal adhesion, migration, and invasion [89]. Mechanistically, ORP2 reduces adhesion plaques by inhibiting the autophosphorylation of FAK, which interacts with the SRC family of kinases, thereby diminishing the formation of invasive pseudopods [89]. FAK, a scaffolding protein, mediates interactions between integrins and the actin cytoskeleton, regulating cell adhesion and cell-environment communication [90]. It is highly expressed in metastatic CRC and is influenced by lipid signaling [91,92]. Additionally, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), an ADP-ribosyltransferase essential for the transfer function of ORP2, plays a role in this process [89,93]. ORP2 inhibits CRC growth and distant metastasis, and these effects can be further enhanced by PARP1 inhibitors, such as AG14361 [89]. Collectively, these findings indicate that targeting ORP2 and FAK could represent a promising combination approach for CRC therapy. However, further studies are needed to validate these potential therapeutic approaches.
DUAL ROLE OF ORP3 IN TUMOR CELL MIGRATION AND INVASION: PROMOTION AND INHIBITION:
ORP3 is aberrantly upregulated in CRC and hepatocellular carcinoma and promotes tumor cell migration and invasion [94,95]. ORP3 expression is regulated by methylation, which is notably upregulated in CRC and correlates with poor prognosis in this malignancy [96]. Hyperphosphorylated ORP3 enhances the formation of ORP3-VAPA complexes by increasing the affinity of its FFAT motif for VAPA [73]. This interaction, in turn, activates R-Ras, a critical factor in multiple cancers, thereby promoting cell adhesion, migration, and invasion [73,97,98]. In CRC, high ORP3 expression is associated with poor tumor differentiation, advanced TNM stage, and reduced survival, while it also drives tumor proliferation, invasion, and metastasis [99,100]. Zhang et al reported that KRAS mutations are prevalent in CRC samples with high ORP3 expression, but the specific roles of these mutations in the context of ORP3 overexpression warrant further investigation [99].
Hu et al discovered that in gastric cancer cells, ORP3 activates the R-Ras/Akt signaling pathway through R-Ras phosphorylation, thereby promoting tumor growth [94]. The high expression of ORP3 was linked to promoter hypomethylation and increased DNA copy number, while mutations in ORP3 were rare in gastric cancer [94]. These findings indicate that ORP3 drives malignancy in gastric cancer primarily through DNA copy number amplification and promoter hypomethylation-induced overexpression. Su et al reported that in liver hepatocellular carcinoma, ORP3 expression was significantly elevated in patients with advanced-stage disease and correlated with TP53 mutations, highlighting its potential role in liver hepatocellular carcinoma progression [95]. Similarly, Tian et al observed that ORP3 was markedly overexpressed in hepatocellular carcinoma and associated with overall survival and disease-specific survival [101]. Knockdown of ORP3 induced G2/M–phase cell cycle arrest, promoting apoptosis and suppressing cell migration and proliferation [101]. These results suggest that ORP3 may serve as both a prognostic marker and a regulatory factor in hepatocellular carcinoma. However, further data and experimental studies are required to fully elucidate the role of ORP3 in liver cancer progression.
However, in bladder cancer, ORP3 exhibits a tumor-suppressive effect rather than promoting malignancy [102]. ORP3 exhibits high expression levels in normal bladder and ureteral epithelium but is markedly reduced in bladder cancer tissues from both humans and mice [102]. Experimental studies showed that ORP3 knockdown increased the migration and invasion ability of Rat bladder transitional cell carcinoma line 4 (bladder cancer cell known for its low migration and invasion potential), whereas overexpression of ORP3 instead impaired the migration and invasion of UMUC3 cells (a bladder cancer cell known for its high invasive potential) [102]. The regulation of actin dynamics is a key mechanism underlying cell migration, the formation of invasive pseudopods, and cell invasion [103]. Moreover, an intact actin cytoskeleton is vital for the proper localization of the spindle apparatus [104]. ORP3 affects cell migration and invasive pseudopod formation by regulating actin dynamics, and its downregulation leads to an increase in multipolar spindles that may trigger chromosome segregation defects [102]. Given that chromosomal abnormalities are positively associated with the invasive potential of bladder cancer, the downregulation of ORP3 promotes bladder cancer invasiveness and is associated with poor prognosis [102].
In summary, ORP3 plays a significant role in driving tumor progression in various solid cancers but exhibits a tumor-suppressive effect in bladder cancer. Targeting ORP3 may emerge as a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment. However, its specific mechanisms in different cancer types still require further investigation.
ORP5 PROMOTES TUMOR CELL GROWTH AND PROLIFERATION AS WELL AS TUMOR CELL MIGRATION AND INVASION:
Koga et al [11] were the first to explore the role of ORP5 in hamster and human pancreatic cancer cells. Their findings revealed that ORP5 overexpression significantly enhanced the invasion rate of these cancer cells, while its deletion reduced invasiveness, suggesting that ORP5 serves as a key factor in promoting tumor cell invasion. Clinical sample analysis further supported these results, demonstrating that high levels of ORP5 expression are correlated with poor prognosis in human pancreatic cancer [11]. Building on this, Ishikawa et al investigated the underlying mechanisms and discovered that ORP5 induces the expression of SREBP2, a crucial transcriptional regulator of cholesterol biosynthesis [55]. This indicates that ORP5 facilitates cholesterol synthesis and uptake, which are processes essential for tumor cell proliferation and invasion. Elevated ORP5 expression is associated with poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer, and SREBP2-induced downstream targets, such as histone deacetylase 5, may further contribute to disease progression [11]. In lung cancer, studies have also identified high levels of ORP5 expression in metastasis-positive cases, with ORP5 overexpression enhancing the invasiveness of lung cancer cells [105]. The regulation of membrane lipid homeostasis by ORP5 and other lipid transfer proteins has significant implications for mTORC1 [33], a central regulator of lipid metabolism, protein synthesis, and cell proliferation [106–108]. In cancer, mTORC1 hyperactivation intersects with the PI3K/AKT and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/MAPK ERK kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) signaling pathways, thereby driving oncogenic processes [109]. Thus, in some cancer cells, ORP5–mediated phosphatidylserine transport may facilitate mTORC1 activation, further promoting cancer cell proliferation [33]. These findings highlight ORP5 as a potential therapeutic target in cancer progression.
Wu et al found that in cervical cancer cells, ORP5 promoted migration and invasion in HeLa cells and C33A cells [110]. SREBP1 is a transmembrane protein present in the ER that activates ER stress by promoting the expression and phosphorylation of PERK [111]. In addition, overexpression of ORP5 reduced the protein level expression of key molecules in the unfolded protein response branch (activating transcription factor 6, activating transcription factor 4, binding immunoglobulin protein, and CHOP) and attenuated the fluorescence intensity of ER staining in live cells, suggesting that ER stress was alleviated [110]. Their findings suggest that ORP5 inhibits ER stress in cervical cancer cells by stimulating ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of SREBP1 to reduce its expression, thereby promoting migration and invasion of cervical cancer cells [110]. Additionally, Li et al discovered that ORP5 was significantly overexpressed in renal cell carcinoma, and its elevated expression would promote migration and invasion of renal cell carcinoma cells [112]. ORP5 promotes the ubiquitination and degradation of C-Cbl, the E3 ligase responsible for negatively regulating mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-Met), thereby suppressing the lysosomal degradation of c-Met [112]. This resulted in an abnormal elevation of c-Met and was able to activate mTORC1/AKT, a core signaling pathway of c-Met, thereby promoting tumor cell migration and invasion [112]. These results suggest that ORP5 may be a therapeutic target for the treatment of certain cancers together with mTORC1 inhibition.
ORP9 IS ASSOCIATED WITH TUMOR IMMUNITY:
Yan et al revealed that ORP9 is significantly associated with pancreatic adenocarcinoma prognosis and antigen-presenting cells [113]. They demonstrated that ORP9, a protein linked to ferroptosis, exhibits a positive correlation with various antigen-presenting cells. Moreover, elevated levels of ORP9 were linked to poorer overall survival and progression-free survival, particularly in advanced TNM stages [113]. These findings suggest that ORP9 may be processed by antigen-presenting cells, presented to T cells, recognized by B cells, and subsequently trigger an immune response. ORP9 induces ferroptosis in tumor cells, leading to their subsequent elimination. Zhou et al investigated the relationship between ORP family members and immune cell infiltration in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [114]. Their results demonstrated that ORP9 is positively correlated with the infiltration of CD8+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells [114]. These results indicate that ORP9 is not only associated with tumor metabolism and prognosis but also plays a key role in tumor immune regulation, which is of great clinical significance.
Moreover, ORP10, a hypoxia-inducible gene, is significantly upregulated in pancreatic cancer and correlates with unfavorable clinical outcomes [115]. This oncogenic protein directly interacts with cellular nucleic acid-binding protein, a key regulator implicated in tumor progression across multiple malignancies including CRC, melanoma, and gastric cancer [116–118]. Through this interaction, ORP10 modulates cellular nucleic acid-binding protein expression, thereby critically regulating the proliferative and metastatic potential of pancreatic cancer cells [115]. Furthermore, ORP10 mutations can drive breast cancer [119]. Despite these advances, the roles of ORP1, ORP6, ORP7, and ORP11 in cancer remain largely unexplored, with no studies to date elucidating their mechanisms of action in tumorigenesis. These findings indicate that targeting ORPs holds promise as a potential strategy for cancer therapy. However, additional research is needed to fully elucidate their mechanisms and therapeutic potential.
ORPs and Non-Cancer Diseases
OSBP MAY BE A POTENTIAL ANTIVIRAL TARGET:
OSBP has been recognized as a key broad-spectrum antiviral target that is crucial for the replication of multiple human RNA viruses, including enteroviruses, hepatitis C virus, dengue virus, and encephalomyocarditis viruses [120–125]. Its critical role in the formation of viral replication organelles underscores its importance in RNA virus replication, making it a highly attractive target for the treatment of a wide range of currently untreatable RNA viruses [126–128]. Recent studies have further highlighted the therapeutic potential of targeting OSBP [129]. Currently, several antiviral small molecules (OSW-1 [122], itraconazole [120], and T-00127-HEV2 [127]) have been demonstrated to target OSBP and exhibit significant inhibitory effects against enteroviruses and hepatitis C virus. These findings suggest that antiviral compounds targeting OSBP hold significant promise for the treatment of RNA viral infections, such as those caused by enteroviruses and hepatitis C virus. However, further research is needed to elucidate their precise mechanisms of action and to evaluate their potential for clinical application.
ORP2 IS ASSOCIATED WITH OBESITY-RELATED DISEASES:
ORP2 can bind to β-catenin to form a complex that restricts β-catenin to the cytoplasm, thereby preventing its translocation to the nucleus and subsequent regulation of downstream gene transcription [130]. As a key component of cell adhesion and a core effector in the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, β-catenin plays a critical role in cellular processes [131,132]. In the absence of ORP2, β-catenin undergoes increased ubiquitination, leading to its degradation and reduced cytoplasmic levels [130]. This disruption promotes the differentiation of preadipocytes into mature adipocytes, ultimately contributing to obesity-related characteristics and metabolic disorders [130]. Studies have demonstrated that ORP2−/− Bama minipigs exhibit significant obesity and hypercholesterolemic phenotypes, while adult OSBPL2b−/− zebrafish display abnormal lipid metabolism-related features [133]. However, the precise mechanistic role of ORP2 in the development of obesity-related diseases remains incompletely understood.
In addition to ORP2, other oxysterol-binding protein–related proteins, such as ORP8 and ORP11, have been implicated in obesity-related diseases. ORP8 has been identified as particularly significant in the pathogenesis of type II diabetes mellitus [134], while polymorphisms in the ORP11 gene have been linked to various cardiovascular risk factors in Canadian patients with obesity metabolic syndrome [16]. These findings underscore the broader involvement of ORP family members in metabolic and obesity-related disorders.
DEAFNESS CAUSED BY ORP2 DEFICIENCY IS ASSOCIATED WITH DYSREGULATION OF CHOLESTEROL HOMEOSTASIS:
Numerous studies have demonstrated that ORP2 deficiency in pigs leads to progressive hearing loss, characterized by cochlear hair cell degeneration and abnormal stereocilia morphology, alongside the development of hypercholesterolemia [133]. In auditory cells and zebrafish models lacking ORP2, elevated cholesterol biosynthesis has been observed, driven by the generation of reactive oxygen species due to the inhibition of AMPK activity [135]. Du et al further revealed that a long-term high-fat diet induced mitochondrial damage and apoptosis in the inner ear of hyperlipidemic mouse/rat models [136]. These findings indicate a potential link between ORP2 deficiency-induced lipid metabolism dysregulation and hearing impairment, although additional research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms involved.
In conclusion, these studies suggest that ORPs play an important role in cancer as well as in the development and progression of diseases by regulating lipid metabolism, cellular signaling pathways, and organelle function (Table 2).
Future Directions
Emerging evidence highlights ORPs and their associated signaling pathways as promising therapeutic targets in oncology, with their molecular mechanisms and pharmacological modulation becoming an active area of investigation [140]. Recent studies demonstrate that ORPs regulate tumor progression through multiple mechanisms, including cholesterol homeostasis maintenance [141] and modulation of key signaling pathways, such as mTORC1 [33].
Notably, Santos et al found that both the antifungal agent itraconazole and the novel synthetic compound PRR851 effectively suppress extracellular vesicle–dependent metastatic dissemination and cell motility by specifically disrupting the Rab7-ORP3-VAP-A tripartite complex [138]. Genetic ablation of ORP3-VAP-A similarly attenuates malignant progression in melanoma, cervical carcinoma, and CRC models [138]. Additional findings underscore the therapeutic potential of ORPs modulation: 1) The steroidal agent OSW-1 exerts antitumor effects in ovarian cancer by dual targeting of ORP4/OSBP and subsequent inhibition of cholesterol-driven mTORC1 activation [80]; 2) itraconazole demonstrates antiviral activity through OSBP/ORP4L inhibition [127]; and 3) rapamycin improves DFNA67-type hereditary hearing loss by reducing pathogenic ORP2 mutant accumulation [142]. While these discoveries position ORPs as versatile targets for multiple disease modalities, clinical translation requires further mechanistic validation. Future research directions should prioritize the following: 1) developing isoform-specific inhibitors with improved pharmacologic properties; 2) exploring therapeutic applications in neoplastic and metabolic disorders; and 3) advancing personalized treatment strategies through ORP pathway modulation.
Conclusions
The ORP family represents a crucial class of lipid regulatory proteins that orchestrate cholesterol distribution and lipid metabolism, playing pivotal roles in oncogenesis [143]. Current research demonstrates their dichotomous functions in cancer biology: ORP2 [89], ORP3 [102], ORP4 [80], and ORP5 [110] drive tumor progression, whereas ORP8 exhibits tumor-suppressive activity [144], and ORP9 modulates immune microenvironment dynamics in pancreatic cancer [113]. Additionally, ORP6/7 [9] and ORP10/11 [145] participate in cell migration and metabolic reprogramming, respectively. Notably, pharmacological targeting of ORPs using specific inhibitors, such as Orpinolide [146] (OSBP inhibitor) and OSW-1 [137] (dual OSBP/ORP4L inhibitor) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy. This comprehensive review delineates the multifaceted roles of ORP family members across solid and hematologic malignancies, establishing a molecular framework for developing innovative anticancer interventions targeting lipid metabolic pathways.
References
1. Raychaudhuri S, Prinz WA, The diverse functions of oxysterol-binding proteins: Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2010; 26; 157-77
2. Pietrangelo A, Ridgway ND, Bridging the molecular and biological functions of the oxysterol-binding protein family: Cell Mol Life Sci, 2018; 75(17); 3079-98
3. Lehto M, Olkkonen VM, The OSBP-related proteins: A novel protein family involved in vesicle transport, cellular lipid metabolism, and cell signalling: Biochim Biophys Acta, 2003; 1631(1); 1-11
4. Wang C, JeBailey L, Ridgway ND, Oxysterol-binding-protein (OSBP)-related protein 4 binds 25-hydroxycholesterol and interacts with vimentin intermediate filaments: Biochem J, 2002; 361(Pt 3); 461-72
5. Udagawa O, Ito C, Ogonuki N, Oligo-astheno-teratozoospermia in mice lacking ORP4, a sterol-binding protein in the OSBP-related protein family: Genes Cells, 2014; 19(1); 13-27
6. Charman M, Colbourne TR, Pietrangelo A, Oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP)-related protein 4 (ORP4) is essential for cell proliferation and survival: J Biol Chem, 2014; 289(22); 15705-17
7. Burgett AW, Poulsen TB, Wangkanont K, Natural products reveal cancer cell dependence on oxysterol-binding proteins: Nat Chem Biol, 2011; 7(9); 639-47
8. Lehto M, Mäyränpää MI, Pellinen T, The R-Ras interaction partner ORP3 regulates cell adhesion: J Cell Sci, 2008; 121(Pt 5); 695-705
9. Loilome W, Wechagama P, Namwat N, Expression of oxysterol binding protein isoforms in opisthorchiasis-associated cholangiocarcinoma: A potential molecular marker for tumor metastasis: Parasitol Int, 2012; 61(1); 136-39
10. Lehto M, Tienari J, Lehtonen S, Subfamily III of mammalian oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP) homologues: The expression and intracellular localization of ORP3, ORP6, and ORP7: Cell Tissue Res, 2004; 315(1); 39-57
11. Koga Y, Ishikawa S, Nakamura T, Oxysterol binding protein–related protein-5 is related to invasion and poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer: Cancer Sci, 2008; 99(12); 2387-94
12. Zhong W, Qin S, Zhu B, Oxysterol-binding protein–related protein 8 (ORP8) increases sensitivity of hepatocellular carcinoma cells to Fas-mediated apoptosis: J Biol Chem, 2015; 290(14); 8876-87
13. Jordan SD, Krüger M, Willmes DM, Obesity-induced overexpression of miRNA-143 inhibits insulin-stimulated AKT activation and impairs glucose metabolism: Nat Cell Biol, 2011; 13(4); 434-46
14. Ngo M, Ridgway ND, Oxysterol binding protein–related protein 9 (ORP9) is a cholesterol transfer protein that regulates Golgi structure and function: Mol Biol Cell, 2009; 20(5); 1388-99
15. Nissilä E, Ohsaki Y, Weber-Boyvat M, ORP10, a cholesterol binding protein associated with microtubules, regulates apolipoprotein B-100 secretion: Biochim Biophys Acta, 2012; 1821(12); 1472-84
16. Bouchard L, Faucher G, Tchernof A, Association of OSBPL11 gene polymorphisms with cardiovascular disease risk factors in obesity: Obesity (Silver Spring), 2009; 17(7); 1466-72
17. Schulz TA, Choi MG, Raychaudhuri S, Lipid-regulated sterol transfer between closely apposed membranes by oxysterol-binding protein homologues: J Cell Biol, 2009; 187(6); 889-903
18. Olkkonen VM, OSBP-related proteins: Liganding by glycerophospholipids opens new insight into their function: Molecules, 2013; 18(11); 13666-79
19. Im YJ, Raychaudhuri S, Prinz WA, Hurley JH, Structural mechanism for sterol sensing and transport by OSBP-related proteins: Nature, 2005; 437(7055); 154-58
20. Drin G, Casella JF, Gautier R, A general amphipathic alpha-helical motif for sensing membrane curvature: Nat Struct Mol Biol, 2007; 14(2); 138-46
21. de Saint-Jean M, Delfosse V, Douguet D, Osh4p exchanges sterols for phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate between lipid bilayers: J Cell Biol, 2011; 195(6); 965-78
22. Fuggetta N, Rigolli N, Magdeleine M, Reconstitution of ORP-mediated lipid exchange coupled to PI4P metabolism: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2024; 121(10); e2315493121
23. Mesmin B, Maxfield FR, Intracellular sterol dynamics: Biochim Biophys Acta, 2009; 1791(7); 636-45
24. Levental I, Levental KR, Heberle FA, Lipid rafts: Controversies resolved, mysteries remain: Trends Cell Biol, 2020; 30(5); 341-53
25. Leventis PA, Grinstein S, The distribution and function of phosphatidylserine in cellular membranes: Annu Rev Biophys, 2010; 39; 407-27
26. Kay JG, Fairn GD, Distribution, dynamics and functional roles of phosphatidylserine within the cell: Cell Commun Signal, 2019; 17(1); 126
27. Bura A, Čabrijan S, Đurić I, A plethora of functions condensed into tiny phospholipids: The story of PI4P and PI(4,5)P(2): Cells, 2023; 12(10); 1411
28. Waugh MG, The Great Escape: How phosphatidylinositol 4-kinases and PI4P promote vesicle exit from the Golgi (and drive cancer): Biochem J, 2019; 476(16); 2321-46
29. Drin G, Creating and sensing asymmetric lipid distributions throughout the cell: Emerg Top Life Sci, 2023; 7(1); 7-19
30. Kentala H, Weber-Boyvat M, Olkkonen VM, OSBP-related protein family: Mediators of lipid transport and signaling at membrane contact sites: Int Rev Cell Mol Biol, 2016; 321; 299-340
31. Olkkonen VM, Li S, Oxysterol-binding proteins: Sterol and phosphoinositide sensors coordinating transport, signaling and metabolism: Prog Lipid Res, 2013; 52(4); 529-38
32. Takahashi K, Kanerva K, Vanharanta L, ORP2 couples LDL-cholesterol transport to FAK activation by endosomal cholesterol/PI(4,5)P(2) exchange: EMBO J, 2021; 40(14); e106871
33. Du X, Zadoorian A, Lukmantara IE, Qi Y, Oxysterol-binding protein–related protein 5 (ORP5) promotes cell proliferation by activation of mTORC1 signaling: J Biol Chem, 2018; 293(10); 3806-18
34. Nakatsu F, Kawasaki A, Functions of oxysterol-binding proteins at membrane contact sites and their control by phosphoinositide metabolism: Front Cell Dev Biol, 2021; 9; 664788
35. Meng Y, Wang Q, Lyu Z, Cholesterol metabolism and tumor: Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban, 2021; 50(1); 23-31
36. Vance JE, Cellular itinerary of LDL cholesterol: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2022; 119(6); e2122584119
37. Chang TY, Chang CC, Ohgami N, Yamauchi Y, Cholesterol sensing, trafficking, and esterification: Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol, 2006; 22; 129-57
38. Liu X, Lv M, Zhang W, Zhan Q, Dysregulation of cholesterol metabolism in cancer progression: Oncogene, 2023; 42(45); 3289-302
39. Jiang W, Jin WL, Xu AM, Cholesterol metabolism in tumor microenvironment: Cancer hallmarks and therapeutic opportunities: Int J Biol Sci, 2024; 20(6); 2044-71
40. Zheng S, Lin J, Pang Z, Aberrant cholesterol metabolism and Wnt/β-catenin signaling coalesce via Frizzled5 in supporting cancer growth: Adv Sci (Weinh), 2022; 9(28); e2200750
41. Tang W, Zhou J, Yang W, Aberrant cholesterol metabolic signaling impairs antitumor immunosurveillance through natural killer T cell dysfunction in obese liver: Cell Mol Immunol, 2022; 19(7); 834-47
42. Che L, Chi W, Qiao Y, Cholesterol biosynthesis supports the growth of hepatocarcinoma lesions depleted of fatty acid synthase in mice and humans: Gut, 2020; 69(1); 177-86
43. Chushi L, Wei W, Kangkang X, HMGCR is up-regulated in gastric cancer and promotes the growth and migration of the cancer cells: Gene, 2016; 587(1); 42-47
44. Qiu Z, Yuan W, Chen T, HMGCR positively regulated the growth and migration of glioblastoma cells: Gene, 2016; 576(1 Pt 1); 22-27
45. Xia L, Ding S, Wang X, Advances in ovarian cancer treatment using a combination of statins with other drugs: Front Pharmacol, 2022; 13; 1048484
46. Ashida S, Kawada C, Inoue K, Stromal regulation of prostate cancer cell growth by mevalonate pathway enzymes HMGCS1 and HMGCR: Oncol Lett, 2017; 14(6); 6533-42
47. Kong Y, Cheng L, Mao F, Inhibition of cholesterol biosynthesis overcomes enzalutamide resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): J Biol Chem, 2018; 293(37); 14328-41
48. Revilla G, Cedó L, Tondo M, LDL, HDL and endocrine-related cancer: From pathogenic mechanisms to therapies: Semin Cancer Biol, 2021; 73; 134-57
49. Deng CF, Zhu N, Zhao TJ, Involvement of LDL and ox-LDL in cancer development and its therapeutical potential: Front Oncol, 2022; 12; 803473
50. Hirsch HA, Iliopoulos D, Joshi A, A transcriptional signature and common gene networks link cancer with lipid metabolism and diverse human diseases: Cancer Cell, 2010; 17(4); 348-61
51. Mok EHK, Leung CON, Zhou L, Caspase-3-induced activation of SREBP2 drives drug resistance via promotion of cholesterol biosynthesis in hepatocellular carcinoma: Cancer Res, 2022; 82(17); 3102-15
52. Zhang J, Liu B, Xu C, Cholesterol homeostasis confers glioma malignancy triggered by hnRNPA2B1-dependent regulation of SREBP2 and LDLR: Neuro Oncol, 2024; 26(4); 684-700
53. Lange Y, Steck TL, How active cholesterol coordinates cell cholesterol homeostasis: Test of a hypothesis: Prog Lipid Res, 2024; 96; 101304
54. Zhou T, Li S, Zhong W, OSBP-related protein 8 (ORP8) regulates plasma and liver tissue lipid levels and interacts with the nucleoporin Nup62: PLoS One, 2011; 6(6); e21078
55. Ishikawa S, Nagai Y, Masuda T, The role of oxysterol binding protein–related protein 5 in pancreatic cancer: Cancer Sci, 2010; 101(4); 898-905
56. Naito T, Yang H, Koh DHZ, Regulation of cellular cholesterol distribution via non-vesicular lipid transport at ER-Golgi contact sites: Nat Commun, 2023; 14(1); 5867
57. Olkkonen VM, Ikonen E, Getting to grips with the oxysterol-binding protein family – a forty year perspective: Contact (Thousand Oaks), 2024; 7; 25152564241273598
58. Levine TP, Munro S, The pleckstrin homology domain of oxysterol-binding protein recognises a determinant specific to Golgi membranes: Curr Biol, 1998; 8(13); 729-39
59. Levine TP, Munro S, Targeting of Golgi-specific pleckstrin homology domains involves both PtdIns 4-kinase-dependent and -independent components: Curr Biol, 2002; 12(9); 695-704
60. Jaworski CJ, Moreira E, Li A, A family of 12 human genes containing oxysterol-binding domains: Genomics, 2001; 78(3); 185-96
61. Weber-Boyvat M, Kentala H, Peränen J, Olkkonen VM, Ligand-dependent localization and function of ORP-VAP complexes at membrane contact sites: Cell Mol Life Sci, 2015; 72(10); 1967-87
62. Jansen M, Ohsaki Y, Rega LR, Role of ORPs in sterol transport from plasma membrane to ER and lipid droplets in mammalian cells: Traffic, 2011; 12(2); 218-31
63. Zhao K, Foster J, Ridgway ND, Oxysterol-binding protein–related protein 1 variants have opposing cholesterol transport activities from the endolysosomes: Mol Biol Cell, 2020; 31(8); 793-802
64. Wang X, Peng K, Zhao Y, The macrophage sterol transport protein ORP2 promotes cholesterol efflux and prevents foam cell formation and atherosclerosis: J Biol Chem, 2025; 301(6); 110228
65. Tong J, Tan L, Im YJ, Structure of human ORP3 ORD reveals conservation of a key function and ligand specificity in OSBP-related proteins: PLoS One, 2021; 16(4); e0248781
66. Guyard V, Monteiro-Cardoso VF, Omrane M, ORP5 and ORP8 orchestrate lipid droplet biogenesis and maintenance at ER-mitochondria contact sites: J Cell Biol, 2022; 221(9); 1121107
67. Mochizuki S, Miki H, Zhou R, Oxysterol-binding protein–related protein (ORP) 6 localizes to the ER and ER-plasma membrane contact sites and is involved in the turnover of PI4P in cerebellar granule neurons: Exp Cell Res, 2018; 370(2); 601-12
68. He R, Liu F, Wang H, ORP9 and ORP10 form a heterocomplex to transfer phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate at ER-TGN contact sites: Cell Mol Life Sci, 2023; 80(3); 77
69. Cabukusta B, Borst Pauwels S, Akkermans J, The ORP9-ORP11 dimer promotes sphingomyelin synthesis: Elife, 2024; 12; RP91345
70. Nader GP, Ezratty EJ, Gundersen GG, FAK, talin and PIPKIγ regulate endocytosed integrin activation to polarize focal adhesion assembly: Nat Cell Biol, 2016; 18(5); 491-503
71. Olkkonen VM, Ikonen E, Cholesterol transport in the late endocytic pathway: Roles of ORP family proteins: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol, 2022; 216; 106040
72. Sakai-Kato K, Un K, Nanjo K, Elucidating the molecular mechanism for the intracellular trafficking and fate of block copolymer micelles and their components: Biomaterials, 2014; 35(5); 1347-58
73. Weber-Boyvat M, Kentala H, Lilja J, OSBP-related protein 3 (ORP3) coupling with VAMP-associated protein A regulates R-Ras activity: Exp Cell Res, 2015; 331(2); 278-91
74. Du X, Kumar J, Ferguson C, A role for oxysterol-binding protein–related protein 5 in endosomal cholesterol trafficking: J Cell Biol, 2011; 192(1); 121-35
75. Sohn M, Korzeniowski M, Zewe JP, PI(4,5)P(2) controls plasma membrane PI4P and PS levels via ORP5/8 recruitment to ER-PM contact sites: J Cell Biol, 2018; 217(5); 1797-813
76. Santos NC, Girik V, Nunes-Hasler P, ORP5 and ORP8: Sterol sensors and phospholipid transfer proteins at membrane contact sites?: Biomolecules, 2020; 10(6); 928
77. Wyles JP, Ridgway ND, VAMP-associated protein-A regulates partitioning of oxysterol-binding protein–related protein-9 between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus: Exp Cell Res, 2004; 297(2); 533-47
78. Trinh MN, Brown MS, Seemann J, Interplay between Asters/GRAMD1s and phosphatidylserine in intermembrane transport of LDL cholesterol: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2022; 119(2); e2120411119
79. Zhong W, Yi Q, Xu B, ORP4L is essential for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell survival: Nat Commun, 2016; 7; 12702
80. Bensen RC, Gunay G, Finneran MC, Small molecule targeting of Oxysterol-Binding Protein (OSBP)-related protein 4 and OSBP inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation in monolayer and spheroid cell models: ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci, 2021; 4(2); 744-56
81. Arora A, Taskinen JH, Olkkonen VM, Coordination of inter-organelle communication and lipid fluxes by OSBP-related proteins: Prog Lipid Res, 2022; 86; 101146
82. Zhong W, Xu M, Li C, ORP4L extracts and presents PIP(2) from plasma membrane for PLCβ3 catalysis: Targeting it eradicates leukemia stem cells: Cell Rep, 2019; 26(8); 2166-77e9
83. Guo X, Zhang L, Fan Y, Oxysterol-binding protein–related protein 8 inhibits gastric cancer growth through induction of ER stress, inhibition of Wnt signaling, and activation of apoptosis: Oncol Res, 2017; 25(5); 799-808
84. Li J, Cui J, Li Z, ORP8 induces apoptosis by releasing cytochrome C from mitochondria in non small cell lung cancer: Oncol Rep, 2020; 43(5); 1516-24
85. Yan D, Mäyränpää MI, Wong J, OSBP-related protein 8 (ORP8) suppresses ABCA1 expression and cholesterol efflux from macrophages: J Biol Chem, 2008; 283(1); 332-40
86. Wang H, Ma Q, Qi Y, ORP2 delivers cholesterol to the plasma membrane in exchange for phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-Bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P(2)): Mol Cell, 2019; 73(3); 458-73e7
87. Najafi M, Farhood B, Mortezaee K, Extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness and degradation as cancer drivers: J Cell Biochem, 2019; 120(3); 2782-90
88. Kirkland SC, Type I collagen inhibits differentiation and promotes a stem cell-like phenotype in human colorectal carcinoma cells: Br J Cancer, 2009; 101(2); 320-26
89. Lin K, Zhao Y, Tang Y, Collagen I-induced VCAN/ERK signaling and PARP1/ZEB1-mediated metastasis facilitate OSBPL2 defect to promote colorectal cancer progression: Cell Death Dis, 2024; 15(1); 85
90. Devaud C, Tilkin-Mariamé AF, Vignolle-Vidoni A, FAK alternative splice mRNA variants expression pattern in colorectal cancer: Int J Cancer, 2019; 145(2); 494-502
91. Yu G, Xu M, Zhou L, High expression of phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase predicts a poor prognosis in human colorectal cancer: Front Pharmacol, 2022; 13; 989999
92. Zhang J, Hochwald SN, The role of FAK in tumor metabolism and therapy: Pharmacol Ther, 2014; 142(2); 154-63
93. Huang D, Kraus WL, The expanding universe of PARP1-mediated molecular and therapeutic mechanisms: Mol Cell, 2022; 82(12); 2315-34
94. Hu Q, Masuda T, Koike K, Oxysterol binding protein-like 3 (OSBPL3) is a novel driver gene that promotes tumor growth in part through R-Ras/Akt signaling in gastric cancer: Sci Rep, 2021; 11(1); 19178
95. Su Y, Xue C, Gu X, Integrated bioinformatics analysis reveals the function and prognostic value of OSBPL3 in hepatocellular carcinoma: Heliyon, 2023; 9(6); e17223
96. Wang C, He Y, He Y, Prognostic and biological function value of OSBPL3 in colorectal cancer analyzed by multi-omic data analysis: BMC Gastroenterol, 2023; 23(1); 270
97. Li H, Prever L, Hsu MY, Phosphoinositide conversion inactivates R-RAS and drives metastases in breast cancer: Adv Sci (Weinh), 2022; 9(9); e2103249
98. Liu WN, Yan M, Chan AM, A thirty-year quest for a role of R-Ras in cancer: From an oncogene to a multitasking GTPase: Cancer Lett, 2017; 403; 59-65
99. Zhang M, Meng L, Zhang Z, The relationships of OSBPL3 expression with KI-67 expression and KRAS mutations in CRC: Implications for diagnosis and prognosis: BMC Med Genomics, 2022; 15(1); 259
100. Zhang Y, Luo J, Liu Z, Identification of hub genes in colorectal cancer based on weighted gene co-expression network analysis and clinical data from The Cancer Genome Atlas: Biosci Rep, 2021; 41(7); BSR20211280
101. Tian K, Ying Y, Huang J, The expression, immune infiltration, prognosis, and experimental validation of OSBPL family genes in liver cancer: BMC Cancer, 2023; 23(1); 244
102. Wang X, Liu J, Azoitei A, Loss of ORP3 induces aneuploidy and promotes bladder cancer cell invasion through deregulated microtubule and actin dynamics: Cell Mol Life Sci, 2023; 80(10); 299
103. Dominguez R, Holmes KC, Actin structure and function: Annu Rev Biophys, 2011; 40; 169-86
104. Pan ZN, Liu JC, Ju JQ, LRRK2 regulates actin assembly for spindle migration and mitochondrial function in mouse oocyte meiosis: J Mol Cell Biol, 2022; 14(1); mjab079
105. Nagano K, Imai S, Zhao X, Identification and evaluation of metastasis-related proteins, oxysterol binding protein-like 5 and calumenin, in lung tumors: Int J Oncol, 2015; 47(1); 195-203
106. Han J, Wang Y, mTORC1 signaling in hepatic lipid metabolism: Protein Cell, 2018; 9(2); 145-151
107. Villa E, Sahu U, O’Hara BP, mTORC1 stimulates cell growth through SAM synthesis and m(6)A mRNA-dependent control of protein synthesis: Mol Cell, 2021; 81(10); 2076-93e9
108. Qi S, Sun X, Choi HK, FAK promotes early osteoprogenitor cell proliferation by enhancing mTORC1 signaling: J Bone Miner Res, 2020; 35(9); 1798-811
109. Sun SY, mTOR-targeted cancer therapy: Great target but disappointing clinical outcomes, why?: Front Med, 2021; 15(2); 221-31
110. Wu Y, Min L, Zhang P, ORP5 promotes migration and invasion of cervical cancer cells by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress: Cell Stress Chaperones, 2023; 28(4); 395-407
111. Hu Q, Mao Y, Liu M, The active nuclear form of SREBP1 amplifies ER stress and autophagy via regulation of PERK: FEBS J, 2020; 287(11); 2348-66
112. Song L, Zhang L, Zhou Y, ORP5 promotes tumor metastasis via stabilizing c-Met in renal cell carcinoma: Cell Death Discov, 2022; 8(1); 219
113. Yan T, Wang L, Discovering ferroptosis-associated tumor antigens and ferroptosis subtypes in pancreatic adenocarcinoma to facilitate mRNA vaccine development: Heliyon, 2024; 10(5); e27194
114. Chou CW, Hsieh YH, Ku SC, Potential prognostic biomarkers of OSBPL family genes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Biomedicines, 2021; 9(11); 1601
115. Huang Y, Zhang R, Fan S, OSBPL10-CNBP axis mediates hypoxia-induced pancreatic cancer development: Biofactors, 2025; 51(1); e2124
116. Liu H, Fang Y, Hou B, CircPACRGL promoted cell proliferation, migration and invasion as well as inhibited cell apoptosis in colorectal cancer via regulation of the miR-330–3p/CNBP axis: Mol Cell Biochem, 2023; 478(7); 1633-44
117. Yang F, Hu A, Li D, Correction: Circ-HuR suppresses HuR expression and gastric cancer progression by inhibiting CNBP transactivation: Mol Cancer, 2023; 22(1); 155
118. Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang C, circTADA2A inhibited SLC38A1 expression and suppresses melanoma progression through the prevention of CNBP trans-activation: PLoS One, 2024; 19(4); e0301356
119. Pongor L, Kormos M, Hatzis C, A genome-wide approach to link genotype to clinical outcome by utilizing next generation sequencing and gene chip data of 6,697 breast cancer patients: Genome Med, 2015; 7; 104
120. Strating JR, van der Linden L, Albulescu L, Itraconazole inhibits enterovirus replication by targeting the oxysterol-binding protein: Cell Rep, 2015; 10(4); 600-15
121. Albulescu L, Bigay J, Biswas B, Uncovering oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP) as a target of the anti-enteroviral compound TTP-8307: Antiviral Res, 2017; 140; 37-44
122. Albulescu L, Strating JR, Thibaut HJ, Broad-range inhibition of enterovirus replication by OSW-1, a natural compound targeting OSBP: Antiviral Res, 2015; 117; 110-14
123. Meutiawati F, Bezemer B, Strating J, Posaconazole inhibits dengue virus replication by targeting oxysterol-binding protein: Antiviral Res, 2018; 157; 68-79
124. Wang H, Perry JW, Lauring AS, Oxysterol-binding protein is a phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase effector required for HCV replication membrane integrity and cholesterol trafficking: Gastroenterology, 2014; 146(5); 1373-85e1–11
125. Dorobantu CM, Albulescu L, Lyoo H, Mutations in encephalomyocarditis virus 3A protein uncouple the dependency of genome replication on host factors phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase IIIα and oxysterol-binding protein: mSphere, 2016; 1(3); e00068-16
126. Roberts BL, Severance ZC, Bensen RC, Transient compound treatment induces a multigenerational reduction of Oxysterol-Binding Protein (OSBP) levels and prophylactic antiviral activity: ACS Chem Biol, 2019; 14(2); 276-87
127. Roberts BL, Severance ZC, Bensen RC, Differing activities of oxysterol-binding protein (OSBP) targeting anti-viral compounds: Antiviral Res, 2019; 170; 104548
128. Severance ZC, Nuñez JI, Le-McClain AT, Structure-activity relationships of ligand binding to Oxysterol-Binding Protein (OSBP) and OSBP-related protein 4: J Med Chem, 2023; 66(6); 3866-75
129. Jézéquel G, Grimanelli Z, Guimard C, Minimalist natural ORPphilin macarangin B delineates OSBP biological function: J Med Chem, 2025; 68(1); 196-211
130. Wang T, Zhang T, Tang Y, Oxysterol-binding protein-like 2 contributes to the developmental progression of preadipocytes by binding to β-catenin: Cell Death Discov, 2021; 7(1); 109
131. Russell JO, Monga SP, Wnt/β-catenin signaling in liver development, homeostasis, and pathobiology: Annu Rev Pathol, 2018; 13; 351-78
132. Liu J, Xiao Q, Xiao J, Wnt/β-catenin signalling: Function, biological mechanisms, and therapeutic opportunities: Signal Transduct Target Ther, 2022; 7(1); 3
133. Yao J, Zeng H, Zhang M, OSBPL2-disrupted pigs recapitulate dual features of human hearing loss and hypercholesterolaemia: J Genet Genomics, 2019; 46(8); 379-87
134. Li B, Fan J, Chen N, A novel regulator of type II diabetes: MicroRNA-143: Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2018; 29(6); 380-88
135. Wang H, Lin C, Yao J, Deletion of OSBPL2 in auditory cells increases cholesterol biosynthesis and drives reactive oxygen species production by inhibiting AMPK activity: Cell Death Dis, 2019; 10(9); 627
136. Du Z, Yang Y, Hu Y, A long-term high-fat diet increases oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and apoptosis in the inner ear of D-galactose-induced aging rats: Hear Res, 2012; 287(1–2); 15-24
137. Shen K, Jin X, OSW-1 inhibits tumor cell proliferation and migration via uncoupling protein 2 in hepatocellular carcinoma: Oncol Lett, 2025; 30(1); 361
138. Santos MF, Rappa G, Karbanová J, Itraconazole inhibits nuclear delivery of extracellular vesicle cargo by disrupting the entry of late endosomes into the nucleoplasmic reticulum: J Extracell Vesicles, 2021; 10(10); e12132
139. Adams A, Vogl W, ORP9 knockdown delays the maturation of junction-related endocytic structures in the testis and leads to impaired sperm release: Biol Reprod, 2020; 103(6); 1314-23
140. Olkkonen VM, The emerging roles of OSBP-related proteins in cancer: Impacts through phosphoinositide metabolism and protein-protein interactions: Biochem Pharmacol, 2022; 196; 114455
141. Radulovic M, Wenzel EM, Gilani S, Cholesterol transfer via endoplasmic reticulum contacts mediates lysosome damage repair: EMBO J, 2022; 41(24); e112677
142. Koh YI, Oh KS, Kim JA, OSBPL2 mutations impair autophagy and lead to hearing loss, potentially remedied by rapamycin: Autophagy, 2022; 18(11); 2593-614
143. Wang J, Wang M, Zeng X, Targeting membrane contact sites to mediate lipid dynamics: innovative cancer therapies: Cell Commun Signal, 2025; 23(1); 89
144. Zhang L, Pan Q, Wu Y, ORP8 inhibits renal cell carcinoma progression by accelerating Stathmin1 degradation and microtubule polymerization: Exp Cell Res, 2023; 427(1); 113601
145. Perttilä J, Merikanto K, Naukkarinen J, OSBPL10, a novel candidate gene for high triglyceride trait in dyslipidemic Finnish subjects, regulates cellular lipid metabolism: J Mol Med (Berl), 2009; 87(8); 825-35
146. Cigler M, Imrichova H, Frommelt F, Orpinolide disrupts a leukemic dependency on cholesterol transport by inhibiting OSBP: Nat Chem Biol, 2025; 21(2); 193-202
Tables
Table 1. Classification of oxysterol-binding proteins (ORPs), their subcellular localization, and their transport of lipids.
Table 2. Oxysterol-binding protein–related proteins (ORPs), their roles in cancer and other diseases, and associated therapeutic agents.
Table 1. Classification of oxysterol-binding proteins (ORPs), their subcellular localization, and their transport of lipids.
Table 2. Oxysterol-binding protein–related proteins (ORPs), their roles in cancer and other diseases, and associated therapeutic agents. In Press
Clinical Research
Institutional and Regional Variations in Access to Clinical Trials and Next-Generation Sequencing in Turkis...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951027
Clinical Research
Low-Intensity Blood Flow-Restricted Multi-Joint Exercise Improves Muscle Function in Patients With Patellof...Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950516
Review article
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and MRI in the Evaluation of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A ReviewMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.951283
Clinical Research
Sensory Processing, Dissociation, and Affective Symptoms in Misophonia: A Cross-Sectional Study of 35 AdultsMed Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.950938
Most Viewed Current Articles
17 Jan 2024 : Review article 10,187,196
Vaccination Guidelines for Pregnant Women: Addressing COVID-19 and the Omicron VariantDOI :10.12659/MSM.942799
Med Sci Monit 2024; 30:e942799
13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research 3,708,487
Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788
Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788
14 Dec 2022 : Clinical Research 2,341,643
Prevalence and Variability of Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E in Patients with Elevated Tryptase LevelsDOI :10.12659/MSM.937990
Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e937990
16 May 2023 : Clinical Research 706,524
Electrophysiological Testing for an Auditory Processing Disorder and Reading Performance in 54 School Stude...DOI :10.12659/MSM.940387
Med Sci Monit 2023; 29:e940387







![Oxysterol-binding protein–related protein (ORP) 5/8-mediated phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI4P) exchange over endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-plasma membrane (PM) contacts is displayed. ORP5 and ORP8 facilitate the enrichment of PS at the ER by exchanging it for PI4P, which is subsequently dephosphorylated by the ER-localized phosphatase Sac1 [75]. The recruitment of ORP5/8 to the PM is mediated by interactions between their pleckstrin homology (PH) and phosphoinositide-binding domains with PI4P and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PI[4,5]P2). This figure has been modified from a previous publication by Santo. The software used to create this diagram was WPS [76].](https://jours.isi-science.com/imageXml.php?i=medscimonit-32-e949032-g001.jpg&idArt=949032&w=1000)