Logo Medical Science Monitor

Call: +1.631.470.9640
Mon - Fri 10:00 am - 02:00 pm EST

Contact Us

Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor Logo Medical Science Monitor

17 February 2021: Clinical Research  

Oral Health-Related Risk Factors Among Students in Southeast Serbia

Marija D. Bojović1ABDEF, Ljiljana G. Kesić1ADF*, Aleksandar N. Mitić2AE, Biljana Kocić3DE, Radmila R. Obradović1DEF, Aleksandra Ignjatović4CD, Nina Burić5EF, Marija Jovanović6BEF, Milica S. Petrović1ADEF

DOI: 10.12659/MSM.929375

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e929375

0 Comments

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An association between insufficient or irregular oral hygiene with the occurrence of dental caries, gingival/periodontal diseases, and consequently general diseases has been established. The null hypothesis that there is no difference in the oral health status among students in a preclinical medical program and those who went through a clinical medical program was tested. The main objective of the study was to analyze oral health risk factors (oral hygiene practices, attitudes, and behavior) as well as their impact on oral health by using convenience sampling.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We investigated risk factors for oral health conditions by examining oral hygiene practices, attitudes, and behaviors among the students in the medical program of the University of Niš, collecting data using questionnaires. The study included 396 students of medicine, dentistry, pharmacy, and vocational studies. Participants filled out the anonymous questionnaire.

RESULTS: In both groups, parents were mostly employed, with the representation of employed fathers significantly higher in student group 1 (P<0.05), which is also the only statistically significant difference between the groups. In terms of oral hygiene practices, students were most often trained by parents (68.69%). A very high percentage of students brushed their teeth every day (97.22%), and 54.55% did this twice a day. Of the total number of students, 78.28% thought that it was necessary to use interdental brushes/floss/toothpick. The duration of teeth cleaning was 3 minutes in 39.39%, whereas 55.30% thought that it should be longer than 3 minutes. The most common brushing movements were combined movements and were used by 60.35% of all students. Of all students, 253 (63.89%) never smoked, 182 (49.96%) regularly went to the dentist, and 141 (35.61%) visited the dentist 6 months ago. The majority of students, 265 (66.92%), obtained the greatest amount of information about oral and tooth care from their dentist, which was the case in both age groups.

CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights oral health risk factors among students at the University of Niš. It is essential to determine their oral health knowledge, as it is of great significance both to patients and to students. Also, these students will be the major providers of health services and will be responsible for public oral health promotion. It could help in reformation of the oral health education program. The results of this research indicate that it is necessary to educate preclinical students to solve oral health issues.

Keywords: Oral Health, Oral Hygiene, Students, Dental Caries, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Risk Factors, Serbia, Surveys and Questionnaires, Toothbrushing, young adult

Background

The World Dental Federation defined oral health as the ability to smile, swallow, smell, speak, chew, touch, taste, and show a lot of emotions through facial expressions with self-confidence and without discomfort, pain, and disease of the head and neck [1,2]. Knowledge about oral health and oral hygiene practices, attitudes, and behavior among medical students can be acquired through the epidemiological literature, which stresses the importance of oral health and shows the association of insufficient or irregular oral hygiene with the occurrence of gingival/periodontal disease, caries, and consequently systemic disease occurrence [3,4].

From a practical and professional point of view, medical and dental students are obliged to maintain a good oral health status, as they will serve as first-line public oral health promoters in the future [2].

Periodontal disease is highly prevalent and can affect up to 90% of the worldwide population, with direct impact of microbial dental biofilm as the primary etiologic factor responsible for initiation and progression of periodontal disease [5,6]. The main periopathogens are Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Prevotella intermedia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythensis. Periodontal health is critically dependent upon the behavior of the patient, both in terms of maintenance of good oral hygiene and in seeking treatment when diseases exist [7]. Dental caries affect approximately 36% of the worldwide population and are still one of the major causes of tooth loss and pain in industrialized countries, affecting the daily performance and emotional stability of individuals [8–10]. Throughout the years, knowledge has accumulated that links periodontal disease with many nonoral and systemic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, infection of the respiratory tract, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and neurological disorders [2,11–16].

There is obvious epidemiological need to describe and investigate oral health determinants of risk factors among students of the medical programs because they are future clinicians who will have to promote public oral health as an integral part of overall health service.

The null hypothesis that there is no difference in the oral health status among the students in the preclinical medical program and those who went through the clinical medical program was tested. The main objective of the study was to analyze oral health risk factors (oral hygiene practices, attitudes, and behavior) as well as their impact on oral health by using convenience sampling.

Material and Methods

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS:

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 16.0. Continuous variables are given as means±standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables are given as absolute numbers (N) and in percentages (%). Chi-square tests were used to assess categorical variables for group differences. Statistical significance was defined as P<0.05.

The sample size calculation based on the size of the entire student population of the University of Niš, (27 570), with the accepted values of the α error probability 0.05 and power of study 0.8, showed that 379 subjects was sufficient.

Results

Of 396 students, 93 were medical, 106 were pharmacy, 175 were dental, and 22 were vocational students. There were 142 male and 254 female students (significantly higher, P<0.001); with mean age±SD 21.70±1.70. The youngest students were 18 years old and the oldest 28.

Further investigation included the formation of 2 groups based on the year of study: group 1, in the third year of study, had 186 (46.97%) participants; group 2, in the fourth year of study, had 210 (53.03%) participants. The students of the first group went through the preclinical medical program and students of the second group went through the clinical program. Sociodemographic variables are presented in Table 1.

In both groups, parents were mostly employed, with the representation of employed fathers significantly higher in group 1 (P<0.05), which is also the only statistically significant difference between the student groups.

Oral hygiene practices and behaviors are presented in Table 2. In terms of oral hygiene practices, students were most often trained by parents (68.69%). As expected, a very high percentage of subjects brushed their teeth every day (97.22%) and 54.55% of subjects did this twice a day. The highest percentage of all examinees (45.45%) sometimes used interdental brushes/floss/toothpicks. There is a significant difference in frequencies of using interdental brushes/floss/toothpicks (P=0.021). Everyday use is significantly more frequent in group 2 (P=0.023); rare use is more frequent in group 1 (P=0.033).

The duration of the teeth brushing was 3 minutes for 39.39% of the examinees, whereas 55.30% think that the duration should be longer than 3 minutes. The most common brushing movements were combined movements, used by 60.35% of all subjects. Of 396 students, 35.61% changed the toothbrush every 3 months.

Although all the examinees most frequently brushed their teeth twice a day, a statistically significant difference was found in the distribution of the answer to this question (P=0.022) based on the data from the contingency tables 4×2. This was because students in group 2 more frequently brushed their teeth (3 times a day) than those in group 1 (P=0.008).

Of all students, 253 (63.89%) never smoked, 85 smoked every day, and 11 only periodically (Table 3).

The last part of the questionnaire concerned behaviors among students related to dental check-ups (Table 4). Of all the subjects, 182 (49.96%) regularly went to the dentist, and 141 (35.61%) visited the dentist 6 months ago. The distribution of the answer to this question significantly varies between the groups (P<0.001), which is a consequence of the significantly higher regularity of visits to the dentist in group 2 (P<0.001). Although a routine examination was the most common reason for visiting a dentist, it was more common in group 1 (51.05%) compared with group 2 (41.90%), and based on the 5×2 contingency chart, there is a statistically significant difference in the number of reasons for visiting the dentist (P=0.037).

The majority of students, 265 (66.92%), obtained the greatest amount of information about oral and tooth care from their dentist, which was the case in both age groups. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of answers to this question. This means that students from group 2 were more likely to receive the most information from their dentist than those in group 1 (71.90% vs 61.29%, P=0.049), and they were less reliant on other sources except in personal contact with friends.

Discussion

The students of medical programs are expected to have good oral health knowledge, behavior, and attitudes, especially those who went through the clinical medical program. The students in the preclinical medical program did not receive any oral health education and training. However, students from group 2 learned to improve their oral hygiene skills throughout the study curriculum.

It is very important for all students to have good oral health knowledge because they will be public oral health promoters in the future. They are expected to possess accurate oral health knowledge and behavior in their school years [2].

Tooth brushing frequency, interdental cleaning, and regular check-ups are important determinants of periodontal health. Education level is by far the most significant determinant of good oral behavior [20].

Epidemiologic studies of oral hygiene issues among students in different countries are numerous and similar results were found in previous investigations [21–33]. Numerous studies have been conducted in different populations around the world to evaluate oral hygiene habits. Interviews about oral hygiene habits were conducted and analyzed in Europe [34,35], North America [36,37], Africa [38], and Asia [39–41]. Our results were similar to those found in these studies [26–29].

In 2015, Muthu et al [33] investigated 282 dental students. Of the total, 38% never visited a dentist and brushed their teeth once a day; 56% visited a dentist because of pain; 49% did not look at the color of their teeth; 20% had gingival bleeding when brushing their teeth. In our study, the distribution of answers regarding gingival inflammation was significantly different between groups (P<0.001). Rare gingival inflammation was significantly more frequent in group 2 (P=0.008). The answer “depends” was significantly more frequent in group 1 (P=0.004). The fact that 244 (61.62%) of all students never had gingival inflammation and 78 (19.70%) rarely had gingival inflammation could indicate solid oral hygiene.

Brushing teeth twice a day is recommended in industrial countries [24], but in some other countries it is far from being achieved [42]. Rimondini et al [24] demonstrated that 81.6% of Italian students used 1 toothbrush for less than 3 months, but Kirtioglu and Yavuz [25] found that only 49% of Turkish students used 1 toothbrush for less than 3 months. The results of the current study are in the accordance with above-mentioned study [25].

In 2010 Kumar et al [30] investigated 403 dental and medical students at a university in India. In the current study, students had good knowledge about smoking (21.46% smoke every day, and periodically only 2.78%). On self-assessment, both medical and dental students showed more or less the same frequency of gingival bleeding, carious teeth, tooth pain, or dental hypersensitivity. Although these problems were noted, 76.4% of dental students visited dentists, compared with 46.8% of medical students [30]. These results are in accordance with the results of Usman et al [31] as well as our results, that the dental students showed better knowledge of attitudes and habits related to oral hygiene in comparison with students of medicine and other programs.

Peltzer and Pengpid [43] examined 3344 students in 5 countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Myanmar). In their study the authors found a considerable proportion of self-reported poor dental status and poor oral hygiene among university students.

Borrell and Papapanou [44] and Baelum [45] collected periodontal data to assess the effect of risk factors, and suggested that the most prominent are age, sex, smoking status, educational and socioeconomic status, and diabetes.

Similar results to ours were found in the study by Polychronopoulou et al [32], with the conclusion that students in the final year of medical/dental programs have better skills, habits, and attitudes about oral hygiene than younger students, although in the group of medical students it was not observed.

Conclusions

This study supplied a new understanding of oral health risk factors among students in the University of Niš medical programs. Because they are the professionals of the future, it is essential to determine their oral health knowledge and behaviors, which are of great importance both to patients and to students. Oral health education and promotion through dental visits, electronic and print media, and public health outreach programs are required to improve oral hygiene practices among young adults as well as the general population. Regular dental visits for prophylaxis and professional reinforcement in oral hygiene behaviors are the key to prevent oral diseases.

The results of this research indicate that students in the clinical medical program have better knowledge about oral hygiene issues compared with students in the preclinical medical program. It is necessary to educate preclinical students to raise awareness of the importance of oral health.

Public health dentists should be trained to coordinate oral health needs assessments and to implement and evaluate community-based oral health improvement strategies among some population groups. The knowledge of oral hygiene among dental students in comparison with other study program students should be further investigated.

References

1. Glick M, Williams DM, Kleinman DV, A new definition for oral health developed by the FDI World Dental Federation opens the door to a universal definition of oral health: Br Dent J, 2016; 221(12); 792-93

2. Yao K, Yao Y, Shen X, Assessment of the oral health behavior, knowledge and status among dental and medical undergraduate students: A cross-sectional study: BMC Oral Health, 2019; 19(1); 26

3. Petersen PE: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2009; 37(1); 1-8

4. Locker D, Quiñonez C, To what extent do oral disorders compromise the quality of life?: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2011; 39(1); 3-11

5. Petrović MS, Kannosh IY, Milašin JM, Clinical, microbiological and cytomorphometric evaluation of low-level laser therapy as an adjunct to periodontal therapy in patients with chronic periodontitis: Int J Dent Hyg, 2018; 16(2); 120-27

6. Kinane DF, Stathopoulou PG, Papapanou PN, Periodontal diseases: Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017; 3; 17038

7. Newton JT, Effective communication with patients to improve motivation: A clinical guide to periodontology, 2013; 33-40, London, British Dental Association

8. Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, A systematic review and metaregression: J Dent Res, 2015; 94(5); 650-58

9. Sheiham A, Oral health, general health and quality of life: Bull World Health Organ, 2005; 83(9); 644

10. Frazão P, Epidemiology of dental caries: When structure and context matter: Braz Oral Res, 2012; 26(Special Issue 1); 108-14

11. Nazir MA, Prevalence of periodontal disease, its association with systemic diseases and prevention: Int J Health Sci, 2017; 11(2); 72-80

12. Winning L, Linden GJ, Periodontitis and systemic disease: Association or causality?: Curr Oral Health Rep, 2017; 4(1); 1-7

13. Chan S, Pasternak GM, West MJ, The place of periodontal examination and referral in general medicine: Periodontol 2000, 2017; 74(1); 194-99

14. Le Bars P, Matamoros S, Montassier E, Between health, oral disease, and cancers of the aerodigestive tract: Can J Microbiol, 2017; 63(6); 475-92

15. Bui FQ, Almeida-da-Silva CLC, Huynh B, Association between periodontal pathogens and systemic disease: Biomed J, 2019; 42(1); 27-35

16. Kim J, Amar S, Periodontal disease and systemic conditions: A bidirectional relationship: Odontology, 2006; 94; 10-21

17. World Health Organization: Oral health surveys Basic methods, 1997, Geneva, World Health Organization

18. World Health Organization: Oral health surveys: basic methods, 2013, World Health Organization http://www.who.int/oral_health/publications/9789241548649/en/

19. Liu H, Maida CA, Spolsky VW, Calibration of self-reported oral health to clinically determined standards: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2010; 38(6); 527-39

20. Gómez MV, Toledo A, Carvajal P, A multicenter study of oral health behavior among adult subjects from three South American cities: Braz Oral Res, 2018; 32; 22

21. Ahmad I, Qadri MM, Niazi M, A survey of oral hygiene practices amongst dental students: Pak Orthod J, 2017; 9(1); 50-55

22. Setia S, Pannu P, Gambhir RS, Correlation of oral hygiene practices, smoking and oral health conditions with self perceived halitosis amongst undergraduate dental students: J Nat Sci Biol Med, 2014; 5(1); 67-72

23. Bashiru BO, Anthony IN, Oral self-care practices among university students in Port Harcourt, Rivers State: Niger Med J, 2014; 55(6); 486-89

24. Rimondini L, Zolfanelli B, Bernardi F, Self-preventive oral behavior in an Italian university student population: J Clin Periodontol, 2001; 28(3); 207-11

25. Kirtiloğlu T, Yavuz US, An assessment of oral self-care in the student population of a Turkish university: Public Health, 2006; 120(10); 953-57

26. Shah AH, ElHaddad SA, Oral hygiene behavior, smoking, and perceived oral health problems among university students: J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 2015; 5(4); 327-33

27. Al-Batayneh OB, Owais AI, Khader YS, Oral health knowledge and practices among diverse university students with access to free dental care: A cross-sectional study: Open J Stomatol, 2014; 4(3); 135-42

28. Vangipuram S, Rekha R, Radha G, Assessment of oral health attitudes and behavior among undergraduate dental students using Hiroshima University Dental Behavioral Inventory HU-DBI: J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent, 2015; 13; 52-57

29. Kawamura M, Iwamoto Y, Wright FA, A comparison of self-reported dental health attitudes and behavior between selected Japanese and Australian students: J Dent Educ, 1997; 61(4); 354-60

30. Kumar S, Motwani K, Dak N, Dental health behaviour in relation to caries status among medical and dental undergraduate students of Udaipur district, India: Int J Dent Hyg, 2010; 8(2); 86-94

31. Usman S, Bhat SS, Sargod SS, Oral health knowledge and behavior of clinical medical, dental and paramedical students in Mangalore: J Oral Health Community Dent, 2007; 1(3); 46-48

32. Polychronopoulou A, Kawamura M, Athanasouli T, Oral self-care behavior among dental school students in Greece: J Oral Sci, 2002; 44(2); 73-78

33. Muthu J, Priyadarshini G, Muthanandam S, Evaluation of oral health attitude and behavior among a group of dental students in Puducherry, India: A preliminary cross-sectional study: J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2015; 19(6); 683-86

34. Molarius A, Engström S, Flink H, Socioeconomic differences in self-rated oral health and dental care utilisation after the dental care reform in 2008 in Sweden: BMC Oral Health, 2014; 14(1); 134

35. Sakalauskienė Z, Vehkalahti MM, Murtomaa H, Factors related to gender differences in toothbrushing among Lithuanian middle-aged university employees: Medicina (Kaunas), 2011; 47(3); 180-86

36. Payne BJ, Locker D, Relationship between dental and general health behaviors in a Canadian population: J Public Health Dent, 1996; 56(4); 198-204

37. Ronis DL, Lang WP, Farghaly MM, Tooth brushing, flossing, and preventive dental visits by Detroit-area residents in relation to demographic and socioeconomic factors: J Public Health Dent, 1993; 53(3); 138-45

38. Olusile AO, Adeniyi AA, Orebanjo O, Self-rated oral health status, oral health service utilization, and oral hygiene practices among adult Nigerians: BMC Oral Health, 2014; 14(1); 140

39. Al-Shammari KF, Al-Ansari JM, Al-Khabbaz AK, Self-reported oral hygiene habits and oral health problems of Kuwaiti adults: Med Princ Pract, 2007; 16(1); 15-21

40. Harada S, Akhter R, Kurita K, Relationships between lifestyle and dental health behaviors in a rural population in Japan: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2005; 33(1); 17-24

41. Asgari F, Majidi A, Koohpayehzadeh J, Oral hygiene status in a general population of Iran, 2011. A key lifestyle marker in relation to common risk factors of non-communicable diseases: Int J Health Policy Manag, 2015; 4(6); 343-52

42. Behbehani JM, Shah NM, Oral health in Kuwait before the Gulf War: Med Princ Pract, 2002; 11(1); 36-43

43. Peltzer K, Pengpid S, Dental health status and oral health behavior among university students from five ASEAN countries: Nagoya J Med Sci, 2017; 79(2); 123-33

44. Borrell LN, Papapanou PN, Analytical epidemiology of periodontitis: J Clin Periodontol, 2005; 32(6); 132-58

45. Baelum V: The epidemiology of destructive periodontal disease. Causes, paradigms, problems, methods and empirical evidence, 1998, Aarhus, Royal Dental College, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Aarhus

SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19

19 January 2023 : Clinical Research  

Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Health in 729 Medical Students in Indonesia During ...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938892  

27 December 2022 : Clinical Research  

Effect of Physiotherapy to Correct Rounded Shoulder Posture in 30 Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic in ...

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e938926

10 December 2022 : Clinical Research  

Retrospective Study to Identify Risk Factors for Severe Disease and Mortality Using the Modified Early Warn...

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e938647

In Press

03 Feb 2023 : Clinical Research  

Treatment of Gingival Recession Defects with Pouch and Tunnel Technique Using Connective Tissue Graft and L...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938865  

02 Feb 2023 : Clinical Research  

Online Questionnaire-Based Study to Evaluate the Attitudes and Use of Rubber Dental Dams by Saudi Dental Pr...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938672  

02 Feb 2023 : Database Analysis  

Prognostic-Related Biomarkers in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Correlating with Immune Infiltrates Based...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.938785  

01 Feb 2023 : Clinical Research  

Comparison of 3 Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay Methods to Evaluate Serum Concentrations of Infliximab and Antibo...

Med Sci Monit In Press; DOI: 10.12659/MSM.939084  

Most Viewed Current Articles

13 Nov 2021 : Clinical Research  

Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients Attending the Oncology ...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.932788

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932788

30 Dec 2021 : Clinical Research  

Retrospective Study of Outcomes and Hospitalization Rates of Patients in Italy with a Confirmed Diagnosis o...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.935379

Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e935379

08 Mar 2022 : Review article  

A Review of the Potential Roles of Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Pharmacological Approaches for the Man...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.936292

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e936292

01 Jan 2022 : Editorial  

Editorial: Current Status of Oral Antiviral Drug Treatments for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Non-Hospitalized Pa...

DOI :10.12659/MSM.935952

Med Sci Monit 2022; 28:e935952

Your Privacy

We use cookies to ensure the functionality of our website, to personalize content and advertising, to provide social media features, and to analyze our traffic. If you allow us to do so, we also inform our social media, advertising and analysis partners about your use of our website, You can decise for yourself which categories you you want to deny or allow. Please note that based on your settings not all functionalities of the site are available. View our privacy policy.

Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750
Medical Science Monitor eISSN: 1643-3750